Attachment 15 Draft PP Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 72 KB Posted

Attached to
96 CTG DRAFT FOPR Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA2486-20-F-DRAFT
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

About this file

From the source

Draft PP Questionaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to 96 CTG DRAFT FOPR, newest first.
File Type Posted
Draft_FOPR_Comment_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 9 Draft B-Table TMAS 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 Draft PWS TMAS 2 - 96 CTG.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 Draft 96 CTG LOE Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 Draft Eval Criteria.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 Draft Standard HRO PPQ.pdf PDF
Attachment 19 Draft TO.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 Draft Uniform Pricing Template —
Attachment 10 Draft CDRLs PDF
Attachment 2 Draft CLIN_Structure TMAS 2 96 CTG.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 17 Draft 96 CTG Self-Scoring Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1 Draft FOPR 96 CTG Cover Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 Draft NAICS Codes OASIS Pool Numbers.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 Draft 96 CTG DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 Draft OCI EGLIN-H0xx Organizational Conflict of Interest TMAS 2.pdf PDF
Attachment 12 Draft Financial Responsibility.pdf PDF
Attachment 18 Work Sample Cover Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment 14 Draft 96 CTG TMAS 2 Cross Reference Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4 Draft ITO.pdf PDF
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

FA2486-20-F-1001

Attachment 15

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):

CONTRACTOR NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

ORDER NUMBER (if applicable):

PROJECT TITLE:

TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE,

INCLUDING OPTIONS: MM/YYYY -

MM/YYYY or MM/YYYY - Present Period of Performance for THIS INDIVIDUAL rating form: (cannot exceed 12 months)

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):

NAME:

TITLE:

AGENCY or CUSTOMER:

PHONE:

E-MAIL:

SIGNATURE OF RATER: (Person who can verify the data - Government Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer Representative, Government Program Manager, Etc)

For each of the five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose one (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. Additional text is limited to no more than 200 words.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Rating Adjectival Rating Definition

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the

Attachment 15 contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

OPTIONAL - ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

2. SCHEDULE

Rating Adjectival Rating Definition

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

OPTIONAL - ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

Attachment 15

3. COST CONTROL

Rating Adjectival Rating Definition

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

OPTIONAL - ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

4. Management (or Business Relations)

Rating Adjectival Rating Definition

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Attachment 15

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

OPTIONAL - ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

5. Regulatory Compliance

Rating Adjectival Rating Definition

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

OPTIONAL - ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
2. SCHEDULE
3. COST CONTROL
4. Management (or Business Relations)
5. Regulatory Compliance
CONTRACTOR NAME:
C l i ck here to enter text:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
C l i ck here to enter text_2:
C l i ck here to enter text_3:
PROJECT TITLE:
C l i ck here to enter text_4:
C l i ck here to enter text_5:
C l i ck here to enter text_6:
NAME:
C l i ck here to enter text_7:
TITLE:
C l i ck here to enter text_8:
AGENCY or CUSTOMER:
Click here to enter text:
PHONE:
C l i ck here to enter text_9:
EMAIL:
C l i ck here to enter textSIGNATURE OF RATER Person who can ver i fy the data Government Contract i ng Off i cer Contract i ng Off i cer Representat i ve Government Program Manager Etc:
undefined:
undefined_2:
undefined_3:
undefined_4:
undefined_5:
undefined_6:
C l i ck here to enter text_10:
undefined_7:
undefined_8:
undefined_9:
undefined_10:
undefined_11:
undefined_12:
C l i ck here to enter text_11:
undefined_13:
undefined_14:
undefined_15:
undefined_16:
undefined_17:
undefined_18:
C l i ck here to enter text_12:
undefined_19:
undefined_20:
undefined_21:
undefined_22:
undefined_23:
undefined_24:
C l i ck here to enter text_13:
undefined_25:
undefined_26:
undefined_27:
undefined_28:
undefined_29:
undefined_30:
C l i ck here to enter text_14:

File details come from the government source that posted it.