4_-_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award_(Section_M).docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Dual Axis Autocollimator Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA2263-19-Q-A004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Wright Patterson Air Force Base

About this file

Evaluation Factors

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Dual Axis Autocollimator, newest first.
File Type Posted
3__-__Instruction_to_Offerors_(Section_L).docx DOCX document
Solicitation_nfp__FA226319QA004.pdf PDF
1_-_PD_Rev_1_19M-268A-OP_w_Atch.pdf PDF
2_-_DD_1423_DID.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ADDENDUM

FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation--Commercial Items The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. Technical;

2. Price.

Award will be based on technical acceptability (acceptable or unacceptable) as defined in Table 1 and then lowest total evaluated price. Technical acceptability is more important than price.

Factor 1: Technical The Government's technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals using an Acceptable/Unacceptable Technical Rating. Technical acceptability will be determined solely on the content and merit of the information submitted in response to this request for quotation. Any subfactor evaluated as "Unacceptable" will render the entire proposal unawardable. Technical Tradeoffs will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding acceptability. All offeror's shall provide with their proposal: descriptive literature, brochures, and a technical proposal response. Offerors must submit sufficient technical literature, documentation, etc., in order for the Government to make an adequate technical assessment of the proposed unit. The technical proposal response MUST include a written response to EACH paragraph of the purchase description, and provide sufficient supporting technical literature. Solely restating the paragraphs of the purchase description or limiting the response to a simple statement of compliance is not acceptable. Where the technical literature demonstrates that the proposed unit meets the requirement of a specific purchase description paragraph, you may reference that page and paragraph of the technical literature in your technical response in lieu of restating it.

Table 1 Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating
Description
Acceptable
Proposal meets the requirements of the purchase description.
Unacceptable
Proposal does not meet the requirements of the purchase description.

Factor 2: Price The total evaluated price will be calculated as follows:

(1) On the basic year, the evaluated price will be the unit price proposed multiplied by the specified unit quantity (e.g. 2 EACH).

(2) The sum of all CLINs will represent the total evaluated price.

Attachment 4

File details come from the government source that posted it.