Exhibit - R - Sample Request for Past Performance and Questionaire (1).pdf

PDF 141 KB Posted

Attached to
X1DB--Lease: Replacement Lease for Sebring CBOC
Solicitation number
36C24821R0040
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
EXHIBIT - W - DOL Wage Determination Highland County.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT -U- Sebring Functional Diagram.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT -V- Space Design PFD_SEBRING CBOC - PACT CBOC FOR HIGHLANDS COUNTY.pdf PDF
36C24821R0040 Global RLP R100 REVISED final.pdf PDF
36C24821R0040 0006.docx DOCX document
36C24821R0040 0005.docx DOCX document
36C24821R0040 0004.docx DOCX document
36C24821R0040 0003.docx DOCX document
36C24821R0040 0002.docx DOCX document
36C24821R0040 Global RLP R100 REVISED 07 20 21.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - G - GSA FORM 12000.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - A - Global Lease Template L100 10 2020 a.pdf PDF
Exhibit - Q - Master Format TICS Table (for TI Costs).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EXHIBIT - L - PSRDM Appx B 2020 04-21-2021.pdf PDF
36C24821R0040_3.docx DOCX document
EXHIBIT - S Security Unit Price List FSL II 4 25 17.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - T FAR 52.204-24 Representation Digital Rev 10 20.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - M - Infrastructure Standard for Telecommunications Spaces.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - J - PSRDM Appx A2 2020.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - I - PSRDM Appx A1 2020.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - O - VA OEHRM Site Infrastructure Requirements_v1_1.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - K - PSRDM Appx A3 2020.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - P - Cable Memo Signed.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - C - GSA FORM 3516 - Solicitation Provisions.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - F - GSA FORM 1217.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - H - PSRDM Revised 04-01-2021.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - E - GSA FORM 1364A.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - D - GSA FORM 3517B - General_Clauses (5-29-2020).pdf PDF
36C24821R0040 Global RLP R100 REVISED.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - B Security Requirements (Level II) 06.2018.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT - N - OIT Closet and Cabling Specs.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RLP 36C248-21-R-0040 EXHIBIT R - SAMPLE REQUEST FOR PAST PERFORMANCE AND QUESTIONNAIRE

Date:

From:

To:

Re: Past Performance Questionnaire

Our firm is competing for a requirement solicited by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), the evaluation of our firm's past performance will be included in the award evaluation decision to be made by the VA. Your frank and candid response to this questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process.

Please note that while the responses of this questionnaire may be released to our firm by the VA, FAR

15.306(e) (4) prohibits the release of the names of the persons providing the responses. Complete confidentiality will be maintained.

This survey should be completed by the individual most knowledgeable of our firm's day-to-day operations and the overall condition of the service rendered. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of our performance with the judgment of others in your organization.

Completed evaluations may be scanned and emailed to Sibyl.Graham@va.gov. Completed evaluations must be received no later than close of business on _________________.

If you have any questions regarding this please contact Javier Correa-Ochoa at 305-575-3510, 786-299-

2659 or via email at Sibyl.Graham@va.gov.

Thank you for your valuable input and assistance.

Signature

Contractor Representative Name:

Contractor Company Name:

Contractor Address:

Contract Number:

Date of Award:

Location and Description of Work:

mailto:Sibyl.Graham@va.gov mailto:javier.correaochoa@va.gov

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Contractor Rating:

Please place an “X” on the circle for the rating that best applies to the work performed and provide responses or additional comments accordingly.

Exceptional: Significantly exceeds lease requirements to benefit the owner. Performance in the area indicated was accomplished with few minor problems which were effectively corrected.

Very Good: Meets all lease requirements and exceeds some to benefit of the owner. Performance in the area indicated was accomplished with few minor problems which were effectively corrected.

Satisfactory: Meets all lease requirements. Performance in the area indicated was accomplished with some minor problems which appear to be adequately corrected.

Marginal: Does not meet some lease requirements. Performance in the area indicated reflects a serious problem which has been minimally corrected, if at all.

Unsatisfactory: Does not meet lease requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely or cost-effective manner. Performance in the area indicated contains serious problem(s) which have been ineffectively corrected.

2. Quality of Work

a) Did the contractor comply with all lease requirements? O YES O NO

b) Did the completed project meet your expectations? O YES O NO

c) Is there unexpected maintenance activity? O YES O NO

d) Has unexpected maintenance activity disrupted tenant's operations? O YES O NO

e) Have latent defects been found since project completion? O YES O NO

f) How would you rate the contractor's compliance with safety standards?

O Exceptional O Very Good O Satisfactory O Marginal O Unsatisfactory

g) To what extent have maintenance problems occurred (roof leaks, HVAC levels, pest infestations, etc.)?__________________________________________________________________________

h) Would you select this firm again? O YES O NO

i) Additional Comments

3. Response Timing

a) How would you rate the contractor's timeliness in correcting any deficiencies in regards to maintenance problems (roof leaks, HVAC levels, pest infestations, etc.)?

O Exceptional O Very Good O Satisfactory O Marginal O Unsatisfactory

b) How would you rate the contractor's timeliness in submitting required reports, schedules, and documentation?

O Exceptional O Very Good O Satisfactory O Marginal O Unsatisfactory

c) Additional Comments

4. Cost Control

a) Amount of Original Contract $______________________

b) Were deductions taken for unperformed or defective work?

O Frequently O Rarely O Never

c) How would you rate the contractor's efforts in controlling costs, especially in regards to modifications to the contract?

O Exceptional O Very Good O Satisfactory O Marginal O Unsatisfactory

d) Additional Comments

5. Business Management

a) How would you rate the contractor's on-site management of personnel and subcontractors?

O Exceptional O Very Good O Satisfactory O Marginal O Unsatisfactory

b) How would you rate the contractor's onsite quality control?

O Exceptional O Very Good O Satisfactory O Marginal O Unsatisfactory

c) How would you rate the contractor's management and coordination of subcontractors?

O Exceptional O Very Good O Satisfactory O Marginal O Unsatisfactory

6. Overall Rating of Contractor

a) What is your overall rating of the contractor 's performance?

O Exceptional O Very Good O Satisfactory O Marginal O Unsatisfactory

b) Additional Comments

Evaluated by:

Signature:_________________________________________ Date: ____________________

Name of Evaluator :__________________________________________

Title of Evaluator:___________________________________________

Telephone: ________________________________________________

E-mail: ____________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .