Exhibit F Past Performance Survey.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
X1LZ--Detroit Parking Space Lease
Solicitation number
36C25024R0034
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Survey form for Solicitation 36C25024R0034 for a 650-space parking lease in Detroit, Michigan. The survey evaluates the lessor's performance on criteria such as management of the leased parking space, customer satisfaction, and timeliness. The survey requires the evaluator to rate the lessor's performance as Exceptional, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory across various elements. The evaluator is also asked to provide a narrative summary of the lessor's strengths, areas for improvement, any compliance difficulties, and whether they would have reservations about using this lessor again. The survey indicates that the lease could have been partially or completely terminated for default, convenience, or pending termination, and asks the evaluator to rate the overall lessor performance.

View the file

Other files

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Survey 36C25024R0034 NOTE: This Past Performance Survey Form is Exhibit of Request for Lease Proposal (RLP) 36C25024R0034 and must be received via e-mail kevin.adkins@va.gov and theodore.posuniak@va.gov from the reference(s) prior to the closing date and time stated in Section 4.01 of the RLP.

Rating
Abbreviation
Description

Exceptional

E Performance meets lease requirements and exceeds many to the lessee’s benefit. The lease performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the lessor were highly effective.

Satisfactory

S Performance meets lease requirements. The lease performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Lessor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal
M
Performance does not meet some lease requirements. The lease performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Lessor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Lessor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
U
Performance does not meet some lease requirements. The lease performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the Lessor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Lessor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Neutral
N
Not Applicable or No performance record identifiable.

For the following elements select a rating from the chart above and CIRCLE the appropriate LETTER:

Management of Leased Parking Space

Lessor provided experienced/qualified staff or personnel to meet lease requirements: E S M U N

Lessor maintained the grounds / parking in an attractive and professional manner and in good condition per the terms of the lease. E S M U N

Lessor provided services (janitorial, snow removal, utilities, repairs) per the terms of the lease. E S M U N

Customer Satisfaction

The quality of the parking areas provided were acceptable and per the terms of the lease. E S M U N

The Lessor was responsive to service requests. E S M U N

The lessor was responsive to communications pertaining to the lease administration. E S M U N

Lessor resolved issues to the lessee’s satisfaction and in accordance with the terms of the lease. E S M U N

Lessor / subcontractor provided all services in a courteous and professional manner. E S M U N

Timeliness

The leased space was delivered in a timely manner. E S M U N

Lessor / subcontractor provided all services in a prompt manner. E S M U N

Provide any explanation you may feel is required to clarify any of the above responses:

Narrative Summary

What were the Lessor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the lease/lease?

What were the Lessor’s greatest opportunity for improvement in the performance of the lease?

Were there any compliance difficulties experienced during performance of this lease/lease?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this Lessor in the future or having their subcontractors’ perform one of your critical requirements?

Are there any other issues not covered you feel important to note about performance of this Lessor/lease? ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Government leases only: Has/was this lease partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations NO _______

If yes, explain (e.g., inability to meet price, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)

Considering all the information provided above, by selecting one of the rating descriptions, please rate the Lessor’s performance overall . E S M U N.

Printed Name of Evaluator

Signature

Name of Company

Phone Number

Date

Lease/Lease Name

Period of Performance

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .