Exhibit F - Bidder Reference Scoring.pdf

Exhibit G

Bidder References – Past Performance Ques�onnaire

Contractor:

Part 1: Background

A. Reference – Respondent Informa�on

• Organiza�on:

• Address:

• Name:

• Title:

• Telephone number:

• Email Address:

B. Contract Iden�fica�on

• Contract/Solicita�on award date:

• Contract number:

• Contract/Solicita�on type:

• Contract/Solicita�on value:

• Contract/Solicita�on term:

• Scope of Work/Descrip�on of Services

Part 2: Evalua�on

Excep�onal- Contractor's performance significantly exceeded most or all contract requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which correc�ve ac�on taken by the Contractor was highly effec�ve.

Sa�sfactory- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which correc�ve ac�on taken by the Contractor was effec�ve.

Marginal- Performance meets most contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a problem for which the Contractor has not yet iden�fied correc�ve ac�on or the Contractor's proposed ac�on appears to be effec�ve or has not been fully implemented.

Unsa�sfactory- Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a �mely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's correc�ve ac�on appears or was ineffec�ve.

A. Quality of work/compliance with specifica�on requirements

Unsa�sfactory Marginal Sa�sfactory Excep�onal

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

B. Adherence to delivery schedule/�meliness of product deliverables

C. Ini�a�ve in Solving Contract problems / Ability to solve contract performance issues without extensive guidance from government personnel

D. Responsiveness to Technical Direc�on / Contract Changes

E. Responsiveness / Capability to respond to urgent / short term requirements

F. Accuracy of Reports / Documenta�on

G. Submission of accurate and complete invoices

H. Effec�veness / Reliability / Responsiveness of Contractor Key Personnel

I. Has the Contractor ever been issued a cure no�ce, a show cause no�ce, suspension of progress payments, or other leters direc�ng the correc�on of a performance problem? (please circle answer)

YES NO

If yes, please explain:

J. Based on the Contractor's overall performance, would you select this firm again?

YES NO

If no, please explain:

K. General Comments - Please provide any addi�onal relevant performance informa�on

Respondent Signature: ______________________ Date: ___________________

Part 3: Return Informa�on

Please return the completed ques�onnaire directly to:

Pennie.clark@wsp.wa.gov

Procurement Specialist Washington State Patrol Phone: 360-704-5456 mailto:Pennie.clark@wsp.wa.gov