Exhibit B Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

Exhibit A – Past Performance Questionnaire

Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation No.

Nationwide Recapture Appraisal Services

1. Background. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Rural Development is currently in the process of soliciting for Nationwide Recapture Appraisal Services. The intent of this questionnaire is to obtain relevant and recent past performance of the Offeror (potential source), which will be included in the evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal for a single-award Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract.

2. Instructions. Please complete the questionnaire in full and using the performance ratings below.

Handwritten responses are acceptable. Please provide comments, in the “Additional Comment Form” of the questionnaire, for all questions in which a “Marginal” or “Unsatisfactory” rating is given.

Performance Rating Definitions

OFFEROR INFORMATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

Name of Company Evaluated (Offeror):

Contract Number:

Contract Period of Performance:

Contract Value:

Contract Type:

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE (To be completed by Reference)

Name of Company (Reference):

Point of Contact (person completing questionnaire, including title):

Address:

Telephone Number and Email Address:

Date Past Performance Questionnaire Completed:

Reference Signature:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (To be completed by Reference)

Description of Appraisal Services Provided, including type of properties appraised:

Appraisal Contract Days or Range (i.e. average days to complete):

Appraisal Deliverables Beyond Contracted Timeframe (i.e. percentage of late appraisals):

Number of completed appraisals during a single month:

Geographic location of appraisals completed:

Unsatisfactory

Technical Performance

1. The firm’s ability to understand the assignment and follow a logical approach.

2. The firm’s ability to complete the report accurately with proper back-up data.

3. The firm’s ability to create a report of good quality with no significant edits required.

4. The firm’s ability to manage multiple projects in diverse geographic locations.

Timeliness of Performance

5. The firm’s effective and efficient use of resources. (i.e. Was the contractor able to obtain in a timely manner the amount and type of personnel resources required to support the project, effectively train personnel to perform the work required for the project, and maintain the required workforce throughout the term of the contract?)

6. The firm’s timeliness of performance. (i.e. Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic schedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time, and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?)

Unsatisfactory

Quality Control / Customer Satisfaction

7. The firm provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to ensure satisfactory products/services.

8. Was the firm reasonable and cooperative in response to changes in technical direction, correcting errors, poor performance, criticism/rejection of contract deliverables and other quality issues?

9. The firm’s professionalism, courtesy, flexibility, cooperativeness, responsiveness, and openness to inquiries.

10. How would you rate the firm’s overall performance?

11. Given the choice, would you do business with this firm again?

Additional Comment Form

Please provide any additional comments regarding performance including any major discrepancies or performance issues, and the corrective actions taken if any. The reference may also attach any past performance database reports or other material deemed appropriate that may assist a better understanding of the Contractor’s past performance.

Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 12/31/2024