EXHIBIT B Past and Present Performance Qestionnaire.pdf
PDF 200 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Modernize 6N Inpatient Restrooms (Swing for 3N)
- Solicitation number
- 36C25626R0108
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for evaluating contractor performance on federal contracts.
The form is designed to be completed in two stages: first by the bidding contractor who provides general information about a reference project, then by the reference contact who evaluates the contractor's performance. The contractor must complete the General Information section, which includes contractor company name, point of contact details, reference project title, contract period, contract number, contract dollar value, description of work, and the contractor's role (prime contractor, subcontractor, or key personnel). The completed form is then sent to reference contacts who provide performance evaluations directly to Andrea Payton, Contract Specialist, at the Department of Veterans Affairs NCO 16 Contracting Office in Shreveport, Louisiana, with a deadline matching the proposal receipt date.
The reference contact evaluates the contractor on 21 performance criteria using a six-point scale (1=Unsatisfactory, 2=Marginal, 3=Satisfactory, 4=Very Good, 5=Exceptional, 6=Neutral/No Record), covering areas such as management quality, personnel qualifications, quality control, schedule adherence, problem resolution, cost proposal accuracy, and government cooperation. Additional yes/no questions address whether the contractor received cure or show cause notices, whether the reference would award future contracts, and CPARS rating status. Narrative explanations are required for any ratings of 1 or 2. This questionnaire applies to solicitation 36C25626R0108 for the "Modernize 6N Inpatient Restrooms (Swing for 3N)" project.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Modernize 6N Inpatient Restrooms (Swing for 3N)
Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 36C25626R0108 | Project No. 667-27-130
EXHIBIT B
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR
Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below.
INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT
The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact. Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contract Specialist via postal mail or email, directly to:
Department of Veterans Affairs NCO 16 Contracting Office ATTN: Andrea Payton, Contract Specialist REF: 36C25626R0108 1800 Buckner Street, Suite C200, RM 23 Shreveport, LA 71101 Email Address: andrea.payton@va.gov
Please return the completed form no later than the time set for receipt of proposals. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Payton via email. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
GENERAL INFORMATION [completed by Contractor]
Contractor Company Name
Street Address
Contractor Point of Contact Name City
Point of Contact Phone Number State
Reference Project Title Zip Code Contract Period of Performance (start to finish): Email
Contract Number Contract Dollar Value
Description of Work
Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box) ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub-contractor ☐ Key Personnel mailto:andrea.payton@va.gov
RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]
Company Name Street Address
POC Name City Phone Number State Fax Number Zip Code Email
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).
1 2 3 4 5 6
UNSATISFACTORY MARGINAL SATISFACTORY VERY GOOD EXCEPTIONAL NEUTRAL
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performanc e or the record is inconclusiv e.i
The Contractor … 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5. Followed approved quality control plan. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
9. Identified problems as they occurred. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
12. Developed realistic progress schedules. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
13. Met established project schedules. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
15. Was responsive to contract changes. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
16. Provided adequate project supervision. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
☐ YES ☐ NO
23 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.”
☐ YES ☐ NO
24 To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in
CPARS?
☐ YES ☐ NO
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .