Exhibit A SoW and Specs_All.pdf

1 | P a g e RFQ - Lower Smith River Property Boundary Surveys - Exhibit A

Exhibit A: Scope of Work & Survey Specifications

Scope of Work

Project Details:

Two phases of property boundary survey

Phase 1 survey is approximately 7 miles of boundary o 15 total corners to reestablish

Phase 2 survey is approximately 4 miles of boundary o 4 corners to establish o 12 corners to reestablish

For all boundary lines included in Phases 1 and 2 above, Contractor is expected to:

Resurvey, post, and blaze lines on Exhibit B (maps) per contract specifications utilizing

CTCLUSI signs (furnished; Figures 1 and 2).

Rehabilitate or establish each corner indicated on Exhibit B (maps) per contract specifications.

File Record of Survey for all posted lines in County in which the work takes place.

2 | P a g e

Survey Specifications

These surveys will conform to the requirements of the 2009 Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management Manual of Surveying Instructions. The overall goal of marking the boundary is to provide a visual representation delineating CTCLUSI property from neighboring landowners. Selected provisions and exceptions to the 2009 manual are included below.

Tribal Boundary Signs

a) Install a Tribal Property Boundary sign (Figure 1) on a post facing outward toward the neighboring landowner. Post will be firmly installed 1.5 ft into the ground, and the sign will be mounted at 3.5 feet within one foot of the property boundary.

b) When posting, a sign shall be set 40 to 60 feet from the starting corner and then at intervals not to exceed 100 feet. In addition, line marking posts should be placed at all road crossings. A post will be placed alongside each property corner of Tribal/Federal interest land, unless a similar guard post is already in place.

Line Marking Posts

a) Signs shall be attached to 4-inch or greater diameter trees on the trust lands and shall face the adjoining land. The Tribal Boundary line marking sign (Figure 2) shall be nailed to the base of the tree at ground level, not exceeding 200 feet in distance, and shall be inscribed with the initials of the surveyor in responsible charge. Details inscribed also include the date the tag was placed, the bearing and distance (nearest 0.5 feet) from the tag to the boundary line, and the bearing and distance (nearest 5 feet) from the Tribal Boundary tag to the nearest monumented Public Land Survey System corner.

b) Signs will be attached to the tree with 2 aluminum nails per sign, protruding at least 1 inch from the tree to allow for the growth of the tree.

Boundary Line Marking with Tree Blazes and Flagging

a) See Diagrams below. Generally, all trees greater than 4 ins. in diameter and within 3 ft.

of the boundary will be blazed unless they are behind other closer trees. Blazes on trees will be painted.

b) Flagging shall be placed on each property corner, on all blazed trees that the boundary line intersects, and at the top of each line marking post. Flagging will also be placed at intervals on the boundary not exceeding 50ft.

3 | P a g e

Figure 1 Tribal Property Boundary sign, 6" x 12".

4 | P a g e

Figure 2 Tribal Boundary TRS/ line marking sign, 8" x 6".

WOTFA CTCLUSI

Chain of Survey

This document lists all the surveys found by research of BLM and Douglas County on-line records which may be needed to delineate certain federal interest lands in Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W. Additional surveys may be available through other types of research.

Official Records

In 1877, William Thiel, Deputy Surveyor, surveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W., and subdivided a portion of T. 20 S., R. 9 W.

In 1883, William P. Wright, Deputy Surveyor, surveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W.

In 1891, William Thiel, Deputy Surveyor, surveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W., and subdivided a portion of T. 20 S., R. 9 W.

In 1892, Nathaniel Martin, Deputy Surveyor, surveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W., and subdivided a portion of T. 20 S., R. 10 W.

In 1899, Harvey L. Chandler, Deputy Surveyor, surveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W.

In 1921-22, Fred Mensch, Cadastral Engineer, resurveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W., and subdivided a portion of T. 20 S., R. 9 W.

In 1951-52, Thomas A. Tillman, Cadastral Surveyor, resurveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W., and resurveyed a portion of the section lines of T. 20 S., R. 10 W.

In 1953-54, Thomas A. Tillman and Joseph S. Gawron, Cadastral Surveyors, resurveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W., and resurveyed a portion of the section lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W.

In 1982, Harvey E. Wofford, Cadastral Surveyor, resurveyed a portion of the section lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W.

In 2006-09, Edith M. Forkner, Cadastral Surveyor, rehabilitated and remonumented certain corner points on the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W., and on the section lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W.

Surveys Filed with Douglas County

In 1965-66, person(s) unknown resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 10 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 11. See "BLM Administrative Surveys". (CS 65/107-12)

In 1968, Douglas County Surveyor's Office rehabilitated the 1/4 cor. of sec. 1 only, on the east boundary of T. 20 S., R. 10 W. (CS 53/66-79)

RFQ - Lower Smith River Property Boundary Surveys - Exhibit A: Attachment A 1 | Page

In 1968, Douglas County Surveyor's Office rehabilitated the cor. of secs. 6 and 7 only, on the west boundary of T. 20 S., R. 9 W. (CS 53/66-68)

In 1974, Douglas County Surveyor's Office rehabilitated the 1/4 cor. of secs. 17 and 20, T. 20 S., R. 9 W.

(CS 56/49-3)

In 1977, Douglas County Surveyor's Office rehabilitated the cor. of secs. 1, 2, 11, and 12, T. 20 S., R. 10 W. (CS 59/31-20)

In 1977, Douglas County Surveyor's Office rehabilitated the 1/4 cor. of secs. 7 and 8, T. 20 S., R. 9 W.

(CS 59/34-12)

In 1979, Ronald E. Stuntzner, PLS No. 1342, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 10 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 26. (M 81-42)

In 1982, Les Roberts, PLS No. 1039, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 30. (M 90-28)

In 1982, Les Roberts, PLS No. 1039, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 21. (M 90-31)

In 1982, Les Roberts, PLS No. 1039, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 20. (M 90-33)

In 1983, Les Roberts, PLS No. 1039, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 15. (M 93-63)

In 1983, Stephen Loy Swinehart, PLS No. 2013, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W. (M 94-77)

In 1983, Les Roberts, PLS No. 1039, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 28. (M 95-23)

In 1983, Les Roberts, PLS No. 1039, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 19. (M 95-24)

In 1983, Stephen Loy Swinehart, PLS No. 2013, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 16. (M 95-53)

In 1984, Les Roberts, PLS No. 1039, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W.

(CS 58/237-2)

In 1990, Harvey Wilcox, PLS No. 2244, rehabilitated the cor. of secs. 23, 24, 25, and 26, T. 20 S., R. 10 W.

(CS 63/104-22)

In 2019, Tony Hostetter, PLS No. 1975, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 16. (CS 65/103-13)

In 2021, Jerry Lee Estabrook, PLS No. 2703, resurveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W. (M 179-43)

RFQ - Lower Smith River Property Boundary Surveys - Exhibit A: Attachment A 2 | Page

In 2021, Jerry Lee Estabrook, PLS No. 2703, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 10 W., and surveyed certain private lots in secs. 11 and 14. (M 180-12)

In 2021, Jerry Lee Estabrook, PLS No. 2703, resurveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W., a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 7. (M 180-35)

In 2024, Stephan R. Stys, PLS No. 86454, resurveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W., a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 10 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 24. (M 184-18)

BLM Administrative Surveys Available at Coos Bay District Office

Note: Administrative Surveys are not a Federal authority survey nor are they a state authority survey.

They are a “no authority” survey. These surveys were conducted in support of timber harvests many decades ago. As time has passed, some local surveyors (non-BLM Professional Land Surveyors) have utilized or rejected monuments established in these administrative surveys. These PLS’s utilize these monuments at their own risk.

In date unknown, Herman Walitalo calculated, and may have surveyed, a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and subdivision-of-survey lines in sec. 20.

In date unknown, Herman Walitalo calculated, and may have surveyed, a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and subdivision-of-survey lines in sec. 30.

In 1965, Bill Mullohan (BLM) and Mike Klein (USFS) resurveyed a portion of the boundary between Tps. 20 S., Rs. 9 and 10 W., a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 9 W., and surveyed certain private lots in sec. 7.

In 1964-66, BLM and International Paper Company resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 10 W., and surveyed certain private lots in secs. 11 and 27.

In 1972, Forrest J. Hales, PLS No. 453, resurveyed a portion of the subdivisional lines of T. 20 S., R. 10 W.

RFQ - Lower Smith River Property Boundary Surveys - Exhibit A: Attachment A 3 | Page

1953-54 Tillman & Gawron BLM

1974 DCSO

1982 Wofford BLM 1982 Roberts PLS (M 90-28)

1982 Roberts PLS (M 90-31) 1982 Roberts PLS (M 90-33) 1983 Roberts PLS (M 95-23) 1983 Roberts PLS (M 95-24)

1983 Swinehart PLS 1984 Roberts PLS 2006-09 Forkner BLM 2019 Hostetter PLS

2024 Stys

2026 BLM

planned

T. 20 S, R. 9 W.

secs. 19 and 20

RFQ - Lower Smith River Property Boundary Surveys - Exhibit A: Attachment A 4 | Page

1951-52 Tillman BLM 1965-66 admin BLM and IPC

1977 DCSO

2021 Estabrook PLS 2024 Stys PLS 2026 BLM planned

T. 20 S, R. 10 W.

secs. 12 and 13

RFQ - Lower Smith River Property Boundary Surveys - Exhibit A: Attachment A 5 | Page

1921-22 Mensch GLO 1951-52 Tillman BLM 1965 admin BLM and USFS

1968 DCSO

1977 DCSO

2006-09 Forkner BLM 2021 Estabrook PLS (M 180-12) 2021 Estabrook PLS (M 180-35)

T. 20 S, R. 10 W.

sec. 1

RFQ - Lower Smith River Property Boundary Surveys - Exhibit A: Attachment A 6 | Page

1968 DCSO

1977 DCSO

1983 Swinehart PLS (M 94-77) 1983 Swinehart PLS (M 95-53) 2006-09 Forkner BLM

1921-22 Mensch GLO 1951-52 Tillman BLM 1953-54 Tillman and

Gawron BLM 1965 admin BLM and USFS

2019 Hostetter PLS 2021 Estabrook PLS (M 179-43) 2021 Estabrook PLS (M 180-35)

T. 20 S, R. 9 W.

secs. 7 and 8

RFQ - Lower Smith River Property Boundary Surveys - Exhibit A: Attachment A 7 | Page