Exhibit 5 - Past and Present Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 189 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SUPPORT SERVICES Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- H92239-20-R-0005
- Issued by
- United States Special Operations Command
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| v1Attachment 1-Govt Responses to Industry Questions.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment 0001 H9223920R0005.pdf | ||
| Exhibit 4 - DD254-signed.pdf | ||
| Released Solicitation H92239-20-R-0005.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
H92239-20-R-0005
NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL
NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
(to be completed prior to mailing or faxing to the respondent)
A. Contractor's Name:
B. Contract number:
C. Contractor's Role in the contract identified above: Prime: Yes
No
Subcontractor to Prime? If Yes, who?
D. Cage Code:
E. Contract type:
F. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No G. Period of performance:
H. Initial contract cost: $ I. Current/final contract cost: $ J. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
K. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
(to be completed prior to mailing or faxing to the respondent)
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other
Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
(to be completed by the respondent)
A. Evaluator's name:
B. Evaluator's title/role:
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:
D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
(to be completed by the respondent)
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.
Program Management E V S M U N/A
Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements and regulations
Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support
Effectiveness in scheduling and maintaining instructor ratios
Technical Performance E V S M U N/A
Perform to standards of instruction for medical courses and the Program of Instruction
Produced highly effective students with a variety of skills
Perform to standards of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements
Perform to standards of implementing current standard practices and specifications
Employee Retention/Attraction E V S M U N/A
Ability to hire/apply a highly qualified workforce
Ability to retain a highly qualified workforce
Maintain qualifications, certifications and clearances on all Contractor personnel
1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated a M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes No
Default Convenience Pending Terminations
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs? Yes or No
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance in a separate document.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
RETURN YOUR COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO, HQ UNITED STATES ARMY SPECIAL OPERATIONS
COMMAND, DCSC, BLDG E2929 DESERT STORM DRIVE, FORT BRAGG, NC 28310, ATTN: BRIAN GILMORE, EMAIL: brian.gilmore1@socom.miland CC gail.williams@socom.mil mailto:jennifer.payne@socom.mil
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .