Evaluation Report.pdf
PDF 50 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12010-0-2023-BG
- Issued by
- Dane County, Madison City, Wisconsin
About this file
This is an Evaluation Panel Report for RFP-12010-0-2023-BG issued by the City of Madison, Wisconsin, for the development of Illustrated Design Guidelines to augment the Historic Preservation Ordinance. The project requires a qualified illustrator/consultant to develop a comprehensive document with visuals that graphically convey definitions and examples of appropriate building interventions meeting ordinance requirements. Five vendors submitted proposals: Afore Preservation Consulting, Commonwealth Preservation Group LLC, Image Advantage, Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson Inc, and NHPA Consultants. The evaluation panel conducted independent assessments based on pre-established criteria, with purchasing staff rating the cost section separately. Panel meetings were held on March 13, 2023 for proposal distribution, April 5, 2023 for discussion and scoring review, and May 9, 2023 for final vendor interviews and selection confirmation.
Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson Inc was selected as the top-scoring vendor following the evaluation process and subsequent Zoom interview confirmation. The local purchasing ordinance did not affect the bid outcome. Specific pricing terms, contract duration, renewal options, and funding sources are not detailed in this evaluation report document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Bid Summary.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Addendum 1.pdf | ||
| RFP 12010.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION PANEL REPORT
RFP-12010-0-2023-BG
Historic Preservation Ordinance Illustrated Design Guidelines
Tuesday, May 9th, 2023
Introduction
The City of Madison solicited proposals from qualified vendors. The following proposed:
1. Afore Preservation Consulting
2. Commonwealth Preservation Group LLC
3. Image Advantage
4. Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson Inc
5. NHPA Consultants
Please reference the RFP for additional information.
Summary of Evaluation Panel Activity
1. Panel members first conducted evaluations of proposals independently based on the pre-established criteria determined by the panel. Then, the panel met to discuss all qualitative and quantitative aspects of the proposals and overall ratings as a group. Purchasing staff rated the cost section of the proposals.
Please see the excel spreadsheet titled Bid Summary to review the scoring.
Based on the scoring, the panel selected the top scoring vendor. A zoom interview was conducted to confirm their selection.
2. Final Selection of the Panel: Johnson, Mirmiran & Thompson, Inc.
3. Local Preference
Was the outcome of this bid changed by the local purchasing ordinance? ___Yes _X_No
4. Evaluation Panel Meetings:
3/13/2023 Distribution of Proposals 4/5/2023 Discussion of proposals and review of technical and cost scores 5/9/2023 JMT Interview and confirmation of selection
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .