EVALUATION FACTORS.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Research Animal Colony Health Testing
- Solicitation number
- HT9425-25-R-E020
- Issued by
-
Defense Health Agency
About this file
The file is an Evaluation Factors document for a Research Animal Colony Health Testing solicitation issued by the Defense Health Agency. The solicitation will be awarded as a single Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract using a "best value trade-off" methodology. The non-cost evaluation factors, listed in descending order of importance, are: (1) Technical Approach, (2) Past Performance, and (3) Price, with price being the least important factor.
The evaluation process will use a competitive best value basis, allowing the government to potentially award to a vendor other than the lowest-priced or highest-rated proposal. Only proposals receiving an "Acceptable" or higher overall rating will be considered for award. The government will evaluate offers by adding the total price for all options to the base requirement price, and may determine an offer unacceptable if option prices are significantly unbalanced. The non-cost factors are significantly more important than cost, and any "Unacceptable" rating in the non-cost factors will result in an overall "Unacceptable" rating for the proposal.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Amendment HT942525RE0200001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| Answers_HT942525RE0200001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Ordering Instructions and GPC Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| Animal Testing QASP_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Animal Testing PWS_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| INSTRUCTIONS.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation - HT942525RE020.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION FACTORS
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(d) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).
(e) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
1. BASIS FOR THE AWARD
1.1. The Government will award a single Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.
“BEST VALUE TRADE OFF” EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
a. Basis for Award: Award of this task order will be made on a competitive best value basis, using “best value tradeoff” among cost/price and non-cost/price factors. A best value tradeoff process will be used, thus, the Government may elect to award to other than the lowest priced offeror, or other than the offeror with the highest rated non-cost/price proposal. Past Performance will be evaluated independently from the other non-cost/price evaluation factors using different standards. The non-cost/price evaluation factors numbered in descending order of importance, are as follows:
(1) Technical Approach,
(2) Past Performance
(3) Price
Government evaluators will not assume that the offeror possesses any capability or knowledge unless it is specified in the proposal. Price is the least important factor. As non-cost/price factors become more equivalent, then cost/price becomes a more important factor.
After each of the above non-cost/price factors is rated individually, an overall rating will be assigned collectively to these factors. If any of the above non-cost/price evaluation factors receives an individual rating of “Unacceptable”. The collective overall rating will also be “Unacceptable”/ Only proposals receiving an overall rating of “Acceptable” or higher will be considered for award.
The non-cost/price factors are significantly more important than cost/price.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .