Animal Testing QASP_Final.docx

DOCX document 39 KB Posted

Attached to
Research Animal Colony Health Testing
Solicitation number
HT9425-25-R-E020
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for Research Animal Colony Health Testing, issued by the Defense Health Agency for solicitation HT9425-25-R-E020. The QASP outlines comprehensive animal health testing services to be performed by a contractor, including serology, PCR, microbiology, parasitology, necropsy, histopathology, and environmental sample testing for USAMRIID (U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases).

The plan specifies detailed performance standards for each testing service, with an Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) of 95% compliance. Key requirements include: identifying sample IDs, providing test results with reference ranges, submitting legible reports within specified timeframes (ranging from 48 hours to 21 days depending on the service), and maintaining high-quality documentation. The government will conduct surveillance through methods like direct observation, periodic inspection, and 100% inspection, with performance rated as Exceptional, Satisfactory, or Unsatisfactory. Contractor performance will be monitored monthly, with quarterly performance meetings, and documented in the Surveillance and Performance Monitoring Module.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Solicitation Amendment HT942525RE0200001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Answers_HT942525RE0200001.docx DOCX document
Ordering Instructions and GPC Information.docx DOCX document
Animal Testing PWS_Final.docx DOCX document
EVALUATION FACTORS.docx DOCX document
INSTRUCTIONS.docx DOCX document
Solicitation - HT942525RE020.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan Research Animal Colony Health Testing

1. Purpose.

This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) provides a systematic method to evaluate performance for the stated contract. This QASP explains the following:

· What will be monitored?

· How Monitoring will take place?

· Who will conduct the monitoring?

· How monitoring efforts and results will be documented?

This QASP does not detail how the contractor accomplishes the work. Rather, the QASP is created with the premise that the contractor is responsible for management and quality control actions to meet the terms of the contract. It is the Government’s responsibility to be objective, fair, and consistent in evaluating performance. In addition, the QASP should recognize that unforeseen and uncontrollable situations may occur.

This QASP is a “living document” and the Government may review and revise it on a regular basis. However, the Government shall coordinate changes with the contractor. Updates shall ensure that the QASP remains a valid, useful, and enforceable document. Copies of the original QASP and revisions shall be provided to the contractor and Government officials implementing surveillance activities.

2. Government Roles and Responsibilities

a. Contracting Officer (CO) – The CO shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CO shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under this contract. The CO is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the contractor’s performance.

b. Contract Specialist (CS) – The CS shall ensure performance of all necessary actions for effective contracting, ensure compliance with the contract terms, and shall safeguard the interests of the United States in the contractual relationship. The CS shall also assure that the contractor receives impartial, fair, and equitable treatment under the contract.

c. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) - The COR is responsible for technical administration of the contract and shall assure proper Government surveillance of the contractor’s performance. The COR shall keep a quality assurance file. At the conclusion of the contract or when requested by the CO, the COR shall provide documentation to the CO. The COR is not empowered to make any contractual commitments or to authorize any contractual changes on the Government’s behalf. The contractor shall refer any changes they deem may affect contract price, terms, or conditions to the CO for action.

d. Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR). A COTR is a Government employee who is authorized to monitor the contractor’s performance under the contract, serve as technical liaison between the contractor and the COR, and perform other duties specified in this document. COTRs have no authority to change any of the terms or conditions of the contract.

3. Contractor Representatives. The contractor’s identified employee shall serve as the contractor’s Program Manager and Task Manager for the contract.

4. Performance Standards. Performance standards define desired services. The Government performs surveillance to determine if the contractor exceeds, meets or does not meet these standards.

The below Performance Requirements Summary Matrix includes performance standards. The Government shall use these standards to determine contractor performance and shall compare contractor performance to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL). If the performance standards are not met in the performance requirement summary the government will document the contractor’s past performance, and may terminate the contract in accordance with FAR Clause 52.212-4 (m), Termination For Cause.

Task
Indicator
Standard
Acceptable Quality Level
Method of Surveillance
Incentive
Comprehensive Animal Health Testing Services – Section 5.2.1.1
Contractor shall perform Comprehensive Animal Health testing services on samples furnished on USAMRIID’s behalf to identify microorganisms associated with the research animals and to evaluate the status of research animals’ tissues, organs, and overall health.
(a) Contractor reports shall identify the provided sample ID and corresponding comprehensive animal health testing results.

(b) Contractor reports shall provide comprehensive animal health testing reference ranges for all values in conformance with industry standards.

(c) Contractor shall submit legible comprehensive animal health test reports within 48 hours to USAMRIID Requestor.

100% Compliant;

Zero (0) Deviation from standard 95% Compliance

Validated User/Customer Feedback
Positive Past Performance Rating
Serology Testing – Section 5.2.1.2
Contractor shall perform Serology testing services on USAMRIID furnished samples to identify microorganisms associated with the research animals and to evaluate the status of research animals’ tissues, organs, and overall health.

(a) Contractor reports shall identify the provided sample ID and corresponding results.

(b) Contractor reports shall provide reference ranges for all values in conformance with industry standards.

(c) Contractor shall submit legible reports within seven (7) days to Requestor.

100% Compliant;

Zero (0) Deviation from standard 95% Compliance

Validated User/Customer Feedback
Positive Past Performance Rating
PCR Services – Section 5.2.1.3.
Contractor shall perform PCR services on USAMRIID furnished samples to identify microorganisms associated with the research animals and to evaluate the status of research animals’ tissues, organs, and overall health.
(a) Contractor reports shall identify the provided sample ID and corresponding results.

(b) Contractor reports shall provide reference ranges for all values in conformance with industry standards.

(c) Contractor shall submit legible reports within seven (7) days to Requestor.

100% Compliant;

Zero (0) Deviation from standard 95% Compliance

Validated User/Customer Feedback
Positive Past Performance Rating
Microbiology Services – Section 5.2.1.4.
Contractor shall perform Microbiology services on USAMRIID furnished samples to identify microorganisms associated with the research animals and to evaluate the status of research animals’ tissues, organs, and overall health.
(a) Contractor reports shall identify the provided sample ID and corresponding results.

(b) Contractor reports shall provide reference ranges for all values in conformance with industry standards.

(c) Contractor shall submit legible reports within 12 days to Requestor.

100% Compliant;

Zero (0) Deviation from standard 95% Compliance

Validated User/Customer Feedback
Positive Past Performance Rating
Parasitology Services – Section 5.2.1.5
Contractor shall perform Parasitology services on USAMRIID furnished samples to identify microorganisms associated with the research animals and to evaluate the status of research animals’ tissues, organs, and overall health.
(a) Contractor reports shall identify the provided sample ID and corresponding results.

(b) Contractor reports shall provide reference ranges for all values in conformance with industry standards.

(c) Contractor shall submit legible reports within 12 days to Requestor.

100% Compliant;

Zero (0) Deviation from standard 95% Compliance

Validated User/Customer Feedback
Positive Past Performance Rating
Necropsy Services – Section 5.2.1.6
Contractor shall perform Necropsy services on USAMRIID furnished samples to identify microorganisms associated with the research animals and to evaluate the status of research animals’ tissues, organs, and overall health.
(a) Contractor reports shall identify the provided sample ID and corresponding results.

(b) Contractor reports shall provide reference ranges for all values in conformance with industry standards.

(c) Contractor shall submit legible reports within 12 days to Requestor.

100% Compliant;

Zero (0) Deviation from standard 95% Compliance

Validated User/Customer Feedback
Positive Past Performance Rating
Histopathology Testing – Section 5.2.1.7
Contractor shall perform Histopathology testing services on USAMRIID furnished samples to identify microorganisms associated with the research animals and to evaluate the status of research animals’ tissues, organs, and overall health.
(a) Contractor reports shall identify the provided sample ID and corresponding results.

(b) Contractor reports shall provide reference ranges for all values in conformance with industry standards.

(c) Contractor shall submit legible reports within 21 days to Requestor.

100% Compliant;

Zero (0) Deviation from standard 95% Compliance

Validated User/Customer Feedback
Positive Past Performance Rating
Environmental Sample Testing – Section 5.2.1.8
Contractor shall perform Microbiology services on USAMRIID furnished samples to identify microorganisms associated with the research animals and to evaluate the status of research animals’ tissues, organs, and overall health.
(a) Contractor reports shall identify the provided sample ID and corresponding results.

(b) Contractor reports shall provide reference ranges for all values in conformance with industry standards.

(c) Contractor shall submit legible reports within 12 days to Requestor.

100% Compliant;

Zero (0) Deviation from standard 95% Compliance

Validated User/Customer Feedback
Positive Past Performance Rating
Invoices – Section 5.2.2.1
The Contractor shall provide legible written, electronic is acceptable, invoices for services conducted to ensure timely payment.

(a) Contractor invoices shall identify the provided sample ID, cost per test per sample or any other rush fees, and total cost per invoice.

(b) Contractor invoices shall provide unique invoice numbers with Contractor payment POC contact information.

(c) Contractor shall submit legible invoices to the Government Purchase Card (credit card) holder within 10 days after the written test results have been sent to the Requestor.

100% Compliant;

Zero (0) Deviation from standard 95% Compliance

Validated Government Purchase Card (credit card) holder Feedback
Positive Past Performance Rating

5. Incentives. The Government shall use past performance as incentives. Incentives shall be based on exceeding, meeting, or not meeting performance standards.

6. Methods of Quality Assurance Surveillance.

Various methods exist to monitor performance. The COR shall use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP.

Regardless of the surveillance method, the COR shall always contact the contractor's Program Manager and/or Task Manager when a defect is identified and inform the manager of the specifics of the problem. The COR, with assistance from the CS, shall be responsible for monitoring the contractor’s performance in meeting a specific performance standard/AQL.

a. Direct Observation. Can be performed periodically or through 100% surveillance.

· Periodically

b. Periodic Inspection. Uses a comprehensive evaluation of selected outputs. Inspections may be scheduled [Daily, Weekly, Monthly, Quarterly, or Annually] or unscheduled, as required.

· As requested or required.

c. 100% Inspection. Evaluates all outputs. Most applicable to small quantity, but highly important services. May be used where there are written deliverables and stringent requirements such as tasks required by law, safety, or security.

· Provide reports and documentation as specified in the PWS and the Performance Requirements Summary Matrix above.

d. Progress or status meetings.

Surveillance results may be used as the basis for actions (to include payment deductions) against the Contractor. In such cases, the Inspection of Services clause in the Contract becomes the basis for the CO’s actions

7. Ratings. Metrics and methods are designed to determine if performance exceeds, meets, or does not meet a given standard and acceptable quality level. A rating scale shall be used to determine a positive, neutral, or negative outcome. The following ratings shall be used:

Exceptional
Performance significantly exceeds contract requirements to the Government’s benefit.
Satisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet contractual requirements

8. Documenting Performance.

a. Acceptable Performance. The Government shall document positive performance.

b. Unacceptable Performance. When unacceptable performance occurs, the COR shall inform the contractor. This will normally be in writing unless circumstances necessitate verbal communication. In any case the COR shall document the discussion and place it in the COR file.

When the COR determines formal written communication is required, the COR shall prepare a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR), and present it to the contractor's Program Manager and/or Task Manager.

The contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the CDR in writing. The CDR will specify if the contractor is required to prepare a corrective action plan to document how the contractor shall correct the unacceptable performance and avoid a recurrence. The CDR will also state how long after receipt the contractor has to present this corrective action plan to the COR. The Government shall review the contractor's corrective action plan to determine acceptability.

Any CDRs may become a part of the supporting documentation for contract payment deductions, fixed fee deductions, award fee nonpayment, or other actions deemed necessary by the CO.

9. Frequency of Measurement.

a. During contract performance, the COR shall take periodic measurements, as specified in the AQL column of the Performance Standards Summary Matrix, and shall analyze whether the negotiated frequency of measurement is appropriate for the work being performed.

b. Frequency of Performance Assessment Meetings.

The COR shall assess performance and provide a written assessment, and upload the assessment to Surveillance and Performance Monitoring Module on a monthly basis, no later than the 15th day of the following month.

The COR at a minimum will meet with the contractor on a quarterly basis and conduct a performance meeting.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .