Evaluation_Criteria_White_Sage_Dozer_Rental__.pdf
PDF 199 KB Posted
- Attached to
- WHITESAGE ESR DOZER RENTAL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140L6426Q0010
About this file
This document is an addendum to FAR 52.212-1 and 52.212-2 that provides instructions to offerors and evaluation criteria for a commercial items acquisition under FAR Parts 12 and 13. The acquisition involves equipment rental services, specifically dozers, to be delivered to two job sites with return transport to a rental yard. A Firm Fixed Price Contract will be awarded to the offeror whose quote conforms to solicitation requirements and represents the best value to the Government. The acquisition is unrestricted, and offerors must be deemed responsible prospective contractors in accordance with FAR 9.1.
Offerors must submit three required components: (1) Past Performance documentation consisting of three past rental requests for similar equipment within the past three years, including discussion of any problems or challenges and a point of contact; (2) Technical Approach demonstrating full understanding of requirements and ability to provide satisfactory service; and (3) Price quotation including per-dozer pricing, delivery transport to both job sites, return transport to rental yard, and fuel costs. Questions must be submitted in writing via email to Pamela Davis at pamela_davis@ios.doi.gov by 3:00 PM PDT on May 22, 2026. All quotes must be submitted electronically to the same email address by 3:00 PM PDT on May 29, 2026. Contract award will be based on comparative best-value determination, where non-cost evaluation factors (Past Performance and Technical Approach) are approximately equal to price. Past Performance will receive ratings of High Confidence, Some Confidence, Low Confidence, or Unknown Confidence; Technical Approach will receive High, Some, or Low Confidence ratings; and Price will be evaluated for reasonableness without scoring.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140L6426Q0010_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Amendment_Questions_for140L6426Q0010_0001.pdf | ||
| DozerRental_WhiteSage_Price_Schedule.pdf | ||
| C_P_Under_SAT_Services_Revisions_5_13_26_52_222-90.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L6426Q0010.pdf | ||
| White_Sage_Dozer_Rental_Specifications.pdf | ||
| Combined_Synopsis_and_Solicitation_White_Sage_Dozer_Rental_.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 – Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items
This acquisition will be solicited and awarded in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Parts 12 and 13.
A Firm Fixed Price Contract will be awarded to the Offeror whose quote conforms to the solicitation requirements and represents the best value to the Government, in accordance with the evaluation factors defined below. Offerors must be deemed a responsible prospective contractor in accordance with (IAW)
FAR 9.1.
This acquisition is being solicited as unrestricted.
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS: All quotes must include all data and information requested and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. Any offeror who submits an incomplete package may be considered nonresponsive. All quotes are expected to conform to the solicitation provisions and be prepared in accordance with this section.
Return the following items with your response:
a. Past Performance: Submit three past rental requests for similar equipment in the past three years. Discuss any problems or challenges with the equipment before and after delivery, include a point of contact.
b. Technical Approach: Demonstrate the full understanding of the requirement and the ability to satisfactorily provide.
c. Price: Quote should include price per dozer; delivery transport to job site 1 and job site 2 and return delivery transport to rental yard, and fuel costs.
QUESTIONS: All questions shall be submitted in writing via email to Pamela Davis at pamela_davis@ios.doi.gov by 3:00pm PDT on May 22, 2026.
QUOTES: All quotes shall be submitted electronically to Pamela Davis at pamela_davis@ios.doi.gov, by
3:00pm PDT on May 29, 2026.
Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 – Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services
BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This contract will be awarded in accordance with FAR 13 and consider the following factors: Past Performance, Technical Approach, and Price. The Government will make a comparative best-value determination, in which all non-cost evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price.
mailto:pamela_davis@ios.doi.gov mailto:pamela_davis@ios.doi.gov
a. Factor 1 – Past Performance: Past performance will be rated based on submitted references, and any other information deemed relevant by the Contracting Officer (e.g. prior work for the Department of the Interior, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System). Offeror’s who lack recent or relevant past performance will be assigned an Unknown Confidence rating.
Past Performance Rating Table
RATING DESCRIPTION
High Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has high confidence that the offeror will successfully provide excellent, well serviced, reliable equipment for the required task.
Some Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has some confidence that the offeror will provide mid-quality equipment to successfully complete the required task.
Low Confidence
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has low confidence that the offeror will be able to supply adequate equipment to satisfactorily complete the required task.
Neutral Confidence
No performance record is identifiable, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.
b. Factor 2 – Technical Approach: The Technical Approach Factor will receive a confidence rating, defined below and based on information submitted in the quoted offers.
Technical Approach Rating Table
RATING DESCRIPTION
High Confidence
The Government has high confidence in the Offeror’s ability to execute the contract successfully with little or no foreseeable problems in equipment delivery, functionality, and reliability to successfully complete task.
Some Confidence
The Government has some confidence in the Offeror’s ability to execute the contract successfully with some potential foreseeable problems in equipment delivery, functionality, and reliability to successfully complete task.
Low Confidence The Government has low confidence in the Offeror’s ability to execute the contract successfully.
c. Factor 3 - Total Price: Price will not be scored or rated but will be evaluated for reasonableness in
IAW FAR 13.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .