Evaluation Criteria for RFQP02162500015.docx

U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Federal Correctional Institution- Elkton Lisbon, OH 44432

Evaluation Criteria For Solicitation RFQP02162500015 FCI Elkton EMG Refill Transformers

A. Proposal’s technical requirements will be evaluated on an acceptable / unacceptable basis:

· Pre-Construction: It will be the responsibility of the awarded contractor to assess the current conditions of the transformer and perform lock out/tag-out measures to ensure the project area and the unit itself is in an inoperable state and eliminates the risk of harm to those performing work. This will include but is not limited to the disconnecting and de-energizing of each transformer as the contractor works on them. Lock-out and tag-out procedures will be in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards.

· Installation of New Oil: Each of the above referenced transformers will be receiving additional oil, added to that content that is currently residing within the unit. The contractor will ensure both the existing oil (R-Temp) with the added quantity (Compatible R-Temp) bring the volume of the oil within the chamber to the proper, complete fill level which will be displayed on the oil level display instrument. The quantity of conforming oil, utilized in the refill process will not exceed 300-gallons.

· Inspection and Acceptance: A report will be generated and provided to the Contracting Officer's Representative detailing quantities of oil used, times, dates, and verification work was completed by the onsite superintendent or alternative contractor, onsite, supervisory personnel. This document will have an official letterhead and contain all relevant information pertaining to the completed work as deemed by and ordered by the Contracting Officer. All reports shall be delivered in Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word or Microsoft Excel format.

It is the offeror’s responsibility to clearly demonstrate their submission meets the Technical Requirements/Statement of Work. The offeror shall clearly address each area of the Statement of Work.

B. Proposals will be evaluated using the following criteria:

· Technical Acceptable/ Unacceptable

· Cost Lowest Overall Price

· Past Performance will be evaluated as it relates to Responsibility.

C. Evaluation Process

· Technical - The technical proposal will be evaluated by the Source Selection Evaluation Team in accordance with FAR 15.101-2. The offeror’s response will be evaluated on an acceptable / unacceptable basis. The proposals will be evaluated for acceptability but will not be ranked using non-cost/price factors.

· Past Performance - Past performance will be evaluated by the Contracting Officer only as it relates to Responsibility. It will be rated acceptable/unacceptable based on the offeror’s performance of services like this requirement but will not be ranked using non-cost/price factors. An offeror without past performance is considered Neutral and will receive an acceptable rating.

· Price - For evaluation purposes, price is defined as the offeror’s proposed price. Additionally, price is defined as the process of establishing a reasonable amount or amounts to be paid for supplies or services. The Contracting Officer will evaluate price independently. Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors. The prices proposed will be evaluated in the base period and option periods in total. The award will be based on the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) proposal.

image1.png