Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 90 KB Posted
- Attached to
- B500 Staircase Carpet Replacement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA460025Q0094
About this file
This document is the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) provision 52.212-2 for Evaluation of Commercial Products and Commercial Services, dated November 2021. The provision outlines the government's evaluation methodology for awarding a contract, which focuses on two primary factors: price and technical capability. Vendors will be ranked by total evaluated price (TEP) and must demonstrate technical acceptability by meeting all criteria in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
The evaluation process will first identify the lowest-priced offer and assess its technical capability. If the lowest-priced offeror receives an "Acceptable" technical rating, they will be awarded the contract. If the lowest-priced offeror is deemed technically unacceptable, the government will evaluate the next lowest-priced offer until a technically acceptable vendor is found. The government intends to award the contract without discussions, reserving the right to conduct only minor clarifications. Price reasonableness will be determined using competitive quotation techniques as defined in FAR 13.106-2 and 13.106-3.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B500 Stairway Carpet Replacement Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Amendment FA460025Q00940001 SF 30.pdf | ||
| SOW B500 Staircase Carpet Replacement.pdf | ||
| Service Contract Act.pdf | ||
| Instructions to Offerors.pdf | ||
| Solicitation - FA460025Q0094.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. Nov 2021
Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
(1) Price: The quotations will be ranked according to their total evaluated price (TEP) as identified by contract line-item total pricing. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all CLINs for the required period of performance.
The offeror's price quotation will be evaluated using one or more of the procedures and techniques defined in FAR 13.106-2 and FAR 13.106-3 in order to determine price reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. Normally, price reasonableness is established through competitive quotations as described in FAR 13.106-3.
(2) Technical Capability: The Vendor shall submit their response in such a way that shows they can meet all of the criteria in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).
Quotes will be evaluated to be technically acceptable or not technically acceptable based on the evaluation factors listed above.
(a) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(b) Basis for Award. If the lowest total evaluated priced offeror receives an “Acceptable” technical capability rating, evaluation of that quote is complete, award will be made to that offeror, and the evaluation process will stop. If the lowest total evaluated priced offeror receives an “Unacceptable” technical capability rating, evaluation of that quote will stop. In that instance, the next lowest total evaluated priced offeror will be evaluated using the methodology above and the process will continue (in order by price) until a technically acceptable offeror is evaluated, or until all offerors are evaluated.
Clarifications conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for a quote revision. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions (while keeping with FAR Part 8).
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .