Evaluation Criteria_CSM Supporting Guam_13.Aug.2025.pdf

Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the past Construction Site Security Monitoring Services

Proposals will be evaluated on price and other than price related factors listed below.

FACTORS

Factor 1 – FCL (Top Secret Facility Clearance Level)

Factor 2: Past Performance (Relevancy and Confidence)

Factor 3: Organization and Management Plan

Factor 4: Technical Approach for Delivery of Seed Task Order

Factor 5: Price

Factor 1 – FCL (Top Secret Facility Clearance Level) Requirement: POF will verify each Offeror’s eligibility on an acceptable or unacceptable basis. Each interested offeror will be asked to complete a one-page form with as a minimum their CAGE and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) codes, authorized individuals to speak on behalf of the firm and signature of those individuals to validate the offeror’s holding of required DoD Top Secret Facility Clearance Level.

If the Offeror is a joint-venture (JV), they will be asked to submit their joint-venture agreement with a CAGE and UEI code for the JV. The Government will validate the Offeror’s security qualification at Phase 1. Offerors who do not have the requisite FCL will not be evaluated any further and will not be considered for contract award.

Factor 2, Past Performance (Relevancy and Confidence): The Offeror shall submit at a minimum three example projects which best illustrate their expertise on projects of similar scope to tasks under this contract. The project example(s) shall describe in detail how Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) ICD 705 or Diplomatic Security Standards were implemented. For evaluation purposes, “similar” shall be defined as possessing all aspects listed below:

a. CSM Services value greater than $5 million; and

b. Projects that involve adherence to ODNI ICD 705 or Diplomatic Security Standards;

and

c. At least one (1) project for CSM Services were for a U.S. Federal Government

Construction Project and worked as the prime security monitoring contractor.

Factor 3, Organization and Management Plan: The Offeror will demonstrate an understanding of the Process Continuum as it relates to security management required for the planning, design, construction, and accreditation of secure facilities under the Intelligence Community Directive (ICD) 705. The offeror will describe the proposed Organization and Management Structure and explain how that structure supports the ability to provide a turnkey solution for construction security as required for this contract. Specifically, it will address how the Organization and Management plan will support:

a. Availability and sourcing of qualified key personnel for timely execution of task orders.

b. Ability to provide construction site temporary physical security in a timely and cost-effective manner.

c. Ability to adapt delivery of services to match planned lulls and surges in construction activity or evolving security posture.

d. Ability to adapt delivery of services to overcome unplanned lulls and surges in construction activity due to construction scheduling issues, security incidents, or changes in security policy.

The contractor will demonstrate that key contract management personnel possess the required training, qualification, and past experience to successfully manage tasks under this contract. The Government will evaluate the team members, their roles and responsibilities, their technical competencies, their resources, and how their resources will be utilized. The Offeror’s proposed training plan will be evaluated to ensure that the Offeror has fully trained and qualified personnel ready for deployment overseas for immediate assignment of CSM requirements to meet the technical demands.

Factor 4, Technical Approach for Delivery of Seed Task Order. The Offeror will describe its technical approach for the delivery of the seed task order. A qualifying proposal shall provide a detailed resource loaded plan that shows at a minimum:

a. Timeframe for establishment of Invited Contractor Status under the Status of Forces Agreement.

b. Timeframe for vetting of proposed personnel / passing of personnel clearances.

c. Timeframe for mobilization and establishment of temporary site security

d. Time phased deployment plan for construction security personnel to accommodate construction scheduling.

e. Process for coordination between CSM contractor and construction contractor.

Factor 5, Price: Offerors will be required to submit price proposals for the seed task order to demonstrate the offeror’s understanding of the requirements. The price proposal is intended to be used for the price competition and will be utilized for the price factor in the tradeoff process.

The list of labor categories will be provided by the Government for easy comparison of labor rates among the competitors.

BASIS FOR AWARD

The award will be made based on the best overall (i.e., best value) proposal that is determined to be the most beneficial to the Government, with appropriate consideration given to the five (5) evaluation factors: FCL (Top Secret Facility Clearance Level), Past Performance (Relevancy and Confidence), Organization and Management Plan, Technical Approach for Delivery of Seed Task Order and Price. To receive consideration for award, a rating of no less than “Acceptable” must be achieved for all non-price factors. Offerors are cautioned that the award may not necessarily be made to the lowest price offered.