Evaluation critera.docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Re-measurement of tagged trees, tree ingrowth, and tag maintenance at Matlock and Molalla Experimental sites
Solicitation number
1240BG24Q0016
Issued by

About this file

This document outlines evaluation criteria for a federal contract solicitation to conduct remeasurement of tagged trees at two research sites in Oregon and Washington. The solicitation will evaluate offerors on their knowledge of tree and plant species in western Washington and Oregon from previous field work, specialized experience collecting forestry data, and past performance as demonstrated by quality of services, timeliness, and customer satisfaction on prior contracts. Price will also be considered as a criterion but will increase in importance based on the equality of technical scores or if a price is significantly high. The contract opportunity is to remeasure tree diameters and heights at the Molalla, Oregon and Matlock, Washington research sites over a 20-year period to examine productivity responses of planted Douglas-fir to woody debris manipulation and vegetation control treatments. The field work will involve 3,747 total trees across the two sites owned by Port Blakely Tree Farms and Green Diamond Resource Company respectively. The solicitation was issued by the US Department of Agriculture Forest Service.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Statement of Work M M remeasure.docx DOCX document
Appendix A_attachments.docx DOCX document
Solicitation 1240BG24Q0016.docx DOCX document
FS-Schedule of Items Template_tree remeasurement.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CRITERIA 1, KNOWLEDGE OF GEOGRAPHIC AREA

Experience completing field work and having familiarity with common tree and plant species in western Washington and Oregon.

CRITERIA 2, SPECIALIZED TEAM EXPERIENCE:

Specialized experience and technical competence in collection data for the purpose of forestry research.

CRITERIA 3 PAST PERFORMANCE.

The Government will evaluate the following elements, which are of equal value of importance in relation to each other:

a) Quality of the services - End users satisfaction with work quality, reworks required due to poor work quality, decline in quality to meet production schedule, problems encountered with the project. Effective management (e.g., business relationships with others, relaying quality concerns, working with others to correct deficiencies and resolve problem areas); working relationship with the Contracting Officer and technical representatives on problem solving and recommending solutions, proposing new or improved processes/procedures, and showing initiative in overcoming obstacles; response to problems with the supervisor and/or operators.

b) Timeliness of performance – Compliance with delivery schedules, responsiveness to requests for changes in delivery schedule (e.g., added work).

c) Customer satisfaction - Satisfaction of end users with Contractor’s completed services.

CRITERIA 4. PRICE.

The degree of importance of the price will increase with the degree of equality of the other criteria., or, when the price is so significantly high as to diminish the value of the technical superiority to the Government.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .