ESBD_File_337587_Attachment A- Contractor_Vendor Evaluation Form.pdf

Contractor/Vendor Evaluation Project Contact Name Company Name:

Service Date: Contract No. Project Name

Contract Type: ☐ Job Order Contractor ☐ IDIQ ☐Subcontractor ☐Other (check all that apply)

Please rate the effectiveness of the Contractor’s performance on the project across the following dimensions:

Evaluation Criteria: 0 = N/A 1 = Low 5 = Moderate 10 = High

Performance Dimensions: Value Score

1) Scheduling/Productivity

• Project schedule quality and completeness

• Controlling of project schedule

• Manpower allocation for maintaining project schedule

• Material deliveries to support project schedule

• Ability to meet substantial completion date and project milestones

• Productivity of work force

0-10

2) Quality of Workmanship

• Compliance with project drawings and specifications

• Workmanship quality and accuracy

• Tools – quality and sufficient quantity

• Equipment – sufficient quantity and operating condition

• Quality of jobsite craft personnel

0-10

3) Subcontractor Management

• Management of subcontractor

• Project coordination of subcontractor

• Productivity of subcontractor

0-10

4) Communication and Partnering • Timely and open communication with University Contact

• Timely pre-construction site visits and meeting

0-10

5) Contract Administration

• Timely submission of complete and correct documentation required for NTP

• Change order processing

• Timely submission of RFIs, Shop Drawings, and Change Orders

• Subcontractor payments made promptly

• Timely submission of complete and correct payment applications

• Quality of paperwork

0-10

6) Safety

• Timely submission of site specific safety program

• Knowledge of OSHA standards

• Implementation of safety rules and regulations

• Promotion and creation of safety awareness

• Daily and overall housekeeping

• Safety record

• Response to safety concerns

• Awareness of public safety

0-10

1 | P a g e

PO #

Contractor/Vendor Evaluation

7) Budget Management

• Knowledge of Scope of Work

• Minimized change orders

• Offered valuable input to owners for managing project on budget

0-10

8) Supervisory Personnel Rating

• Overall performance of this contractor's on-site supervisory personnel and project management staff

• Demonstrated Quality Assurance/Quality Control processes

0-10

9) Contract Close-Out

• Timely completion of all punch-list items

• Timely resolution of all outstanding change orders

• Timely submission of all close-out documents (O&Ms, As-Builts, Warranties, etc.)

• Quality of close-out documentation

0-10

10) Overall Project Management • Delivered effective overall project management

0-10

Total 0-100

Based on these comments, would you recommend this Contractor for comparable work in the future?

☐ Yes ☐ No

Please provide any comments regarding the Contractor’s performance or the quality of its work.

Comments:

Evaluator’s Name: __ Telephone Number : ________________________________________

Stakeholder’s Group: ☐Fac Mgt ☐PDC ☐Fac Ops ☐Util Ops ☐Fac Grnd ☐Fac Cust ☐Other (check all that apply)

2 | P a g e