ESBD_547777_1786137328222_Exhibit A Evaluation Matrix.pdf

PDF 424 KB Posted

Attached to
2027-1015 Central Kitchen Upgrades
Solicitation number
2027-1015
Issued by
Texas

About this file

This is an Evaluation Matrix for a Central Kitchen Upgrades project (CSP 2027-1015) in Texas that establishes the scoring criteria and point allocations for evaluating competitive bids. The evaluation framework assigns a maximum of 1,000 points across multiple weighted categories. Price represents the largest component at 600 points based on the base bid including contingency. The evaluation prioritizes offeror experience and capability through multiple assessment areas: K-12 reference forms and supplier reference letters (30 points combined), three current or past K-12 projects with consideration for similar scope and size (120 points), three non-K-12 projects (30 points), and historical MISD project performance over the past ten years (20 points). Additional experience factors include repeat business performance (20 points) and staff experience at both firm and industry levels (60 points combined).

Safety record and financial capability represent secondary evaluation areas. The safety evaluation allocates 70 points across frequency of safety inspections, OSHA Form 300 logs, safety program manuals and procedures, and drug/alcohol prevention policies. Financial capability evaluation totals 20 points based on surety letters and financial statements demonstrating appropriate resources for project scope. The matrix also incorporates performance metrics worth 20 points, including on-time project completion and projects completed within budget, as well as 10 points for assessing projects currently in progress. An additional 20 points are reserved for any other relevant factors specifically identified in the contract specifications.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Rank Maximum points 1000

Price 600 Base Bid (Includes Contingency)

Offeror's experience and reputation 190 Three (3) K-12 reference forms 15

Rating of 2 or better; plus similar scope and size (2.5 pts for scope; 2.5 pts for size per reference) (BA 57-77)

Three (3) Supplier Reference Letters (BA177) 15

Claims, judgments, arbitration proceedings or suits (BA78) 10

Three (3) current or past K-12 projects (BA 80-100) 120 Similar scope and size (20 pts for scope; 20 pts for size per reference)

Three (3) current or past Non K-12 projects (BA 102-122) 30 Similar scope and size (10 pts for scope; 10 pts for size per reference)

Quality of the offeror's goods or services 40 MISD Projects (Historical Report for past 10 years) 20

Repeat business (BA123) 20

Offeror's safety record 70 Frequency of safety inspections (BA124) 20

“OSHA Form 300 Log (BA178) 10

Safety program manual and/or procedures. (BA179) 20

Drug/alcohol prevention policy and/or procedures. (BA180) 20

Offeror's Proposed Personnel 60 Staff experience (firm) (BA120-139) 30

Staff experience (industry) (BA120-139) 30 Whether the offeror's financial capability is appropriate to the size and scope of the project

Surety Letter (BA181) 10

Financial Statement (BA182) 10

Any other relevant factors specifically listed in the CSP 20 On-time project completion

(BA 63; 64; 69; 70; 76,77; 85; 86; 92; 93; 99;100;107,108; 114; 115; 121,122) 5

Projects within budget

(BA 61,68,75,84,91,98,106,113,120) 5

Projects currently in progress. (BA141-164) 10

Exhibit A Evaluation Matrix

CSP 2027-1015 Central Kitchen Upgrades

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .