EP2954-22 Automotive Maintenance Evaluation Criteria.pdf

FLEET SOLUTIONS GROUP

UNICOR, FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES

Range and Training Group, Glenville, WV

CONTRACT AWARD

EVALUATION CRITERIA AND RATING SCALE

Evaluation Criteria

Each Statement of Work submitted will be reviewed and assigned a score using the Rating/Scoring Scale. The assigned score will be based on how well the evaluation criteria outlined below was fulfilled:

Criterion 1 – New Business Development Opportunities (35% rating factor)

Demonstrate that current New Business Development staff includes those with contacts and resources in the field. The critical role of this contract is to seek out new opportunities for

UNICOR.

Ensure that New Business Development team is familiar with potential customers/commands and processes of the field.

Criterion 2 – Onsite Work Crews and Supporting Staff (30% rating factor)

Include documentation that existing staff includes critical field support staff including mechanics, technical advisors, mechanical engineers, diesel mechanic, and more.

These staff should understand capabilities, assist with research and development, and have trade certifications

(i.e. ASME, ASTM, etc.).

These staff must be available to travel CONUS and OCONUS, in compliance with the current government regulations and protocols.

These staff should have numerous years of experience with Tactical Wheeled Vehicles and civilian vehicles.

Criterion 3– Past Performance (5% rating factor)

List references (1-3) for on-going projects, or projects not more than 3 years ago, that demonstrate performance relevant to this contract evaluation.

Provide an example of a prior project. This packet must include the project’s location, project title, and specific requirements.

Provide a packet that shows a potential new business venture or opportunity for UNICOR.

Acknowledge that auction for government goods will be a requirement and show the ability to manage excess government property.

Criterion 4 – Consultation Fee (10% rating factor)

Include percent cost that will be applied to total project as a consultant fee.

And/or a general finder’s fee for any work that may net 100% UNICOR manufacturing.

Criterion 5 – Logistics Support (20% rating factor)

This includes the ability to create and effectively execute logistic support plans, including vehicle shipment, management, etc.

This onsite work team would ideally operate CONUS and OCONUS, coordinating logistic support.

Please include any contingency plans your organization would put in place to continue operations in situations such as: natural disasters, pandemic, and/or equipment breakdown/malfunction.

Rating/Scoring Scale

The following adjectives will be assigned: Outstanding, Good, Adequate, Fair, and Poor. The scoring of each criterion will be based on the degree (detail and accuracy) that each criterion was met. The below will be used as a guideline:

Rating/Score Descriptive Statement

Outstanding = 5 Applicant fully addresses all aspects of the criterion, convincingly demonstrates that it will meet the performance requirements, and demonstrates no weaknesses

Good = 4 Applicant fully addresses all aspects of the criterion, convincingly demonstrates a likelihood of meeting the requirements, and demonstrates only a few minor weaknesses.

Adequate = 3 Applicant addresses all aspects of the criterion and demonstrates the ability to meet the performance requirements. The Application may contain significant weaknesses and/or a number of minor weaknesses.

Poor = 2 Applicant does not address all aspects of the criterion nor is evidence presented indicating the likelihood of successfully meeting the requirements. Significant weaknesses are demonstrated and clearly outweigh any strengths presented.

Unacceptable = 1 Applicant does not address all aspects of the criterion and the information presented indicates a strong likelihood of failure to meet the Government's requirements.

Scoring Matrix

Vendor A Vendor B Vendor C

Score # x criteria rating % factor Score/%Value Score/%Value Score/%Value

Criterion 1 worth 35%

Example 5 x 35% = 175 5 = (175) 4 = (140) 4 = (140)

Criterion 2 worth 30%

Example 5 x 30% = 150 3 = (90) 5 = (150) 4 = (120)

Criterion 3 worth 5%

Example 5 x 5% = 25 5 = (25) 3 = (15) 3 = (15)

Criterion 4 worth 10%

Example 5 x 10% = 50 4 = (40) 5 = (50) 5 = (50)

Criterion 5 worth 20%

Example 5 x 20% = 100 3 = (60) 4 = (80) 3 = (60)

Total Value Scored 390 435 385