Report_NEPA.pdf

1 Project Setup

2 Funding

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print

ANDE > Pavement Preservation at Andersonville NP-SER PMS FY17 (67300)

NEPA (Edit)

NEPA Status: CE Approved Current NEPA Type: CE

CE (current NEPA type)

Internal Scoping Start: 03/15/2016 Internal Scoping End: 11/15/2016 CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification: All work will be on top of existing pavement.

CE Superintendent Signed Date: 11/17/2016

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety? No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers;

prime farmlands; wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988); national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2)(E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

No

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

Page 1 of 2PEPC - NEPA (Edit)

11/28/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=67300

Last Updated Date: 11/17/2016 Last Updated By: bridget_beers

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

Page 2 of 2PEPC - NEPA (Edit)

11/28/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=67300

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print Print Preview

ANDE > Pavement Preservation at Andersonville NP-SER PMS FY17

National Historic Preservation Act/CRM (Edit)

Form Prepared: 09/13/2016 Data Entered By: Bridget A. Beers

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect: Andersonville National Historic Site Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer A. Has the area been surveyed? Yes B. Have NRHP resources been identified? Yes C. Ground disturbance involved? Yes

D. Archeological resources present? Yes

E. Historic structures/resources present?

Yes

F. Cultural landscapes present? Yes

G. Ethnographic resources affected? No Notes:

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

Archeology/ARPA/NAGPRA/Sacred Sites Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No Started:

Completed:

Report Generated: No Where housed:

ARPA Permit Required: No Permit Number:

Question Answer Notes/Dates of contacts H. Are there any Native American sacred or culturally sensitive sites, locales (such as clan gathering or other cultural event), or landscapes present in the project area?

No

I. Is the location information associated with these sites (such as in caves, contain burials, or at the request of the Native American group(s) to be considered sensitive and/or restricted information?

No

J. Have the associated Native American groups been consulted as to the project potential impacts, if any, to sacred or sensitive sites, locales, or landscapes?

No

K. Is implementation of the project likely to disturb human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, as defined by NAGPRA?

No

L. Is an approved plan of action in place to address inadvertent discoveries of human remains, funerary objects, sacred sites, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

M. Will the project result in the intentional excavation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

Page 1 of 2PEPC - National Historic Preservation Act (Edit)

11/28/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=67300

The Proposed action will: (Check as many as apply)

Question Answer N. Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure. No O. Replace historic features/elements in kind No P. Add nonhistoric features/elements to a historic structure No Q. Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) No R. Add nonhistoric features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape

Yes

S. Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible No S2. Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible No T. Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources No U. Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic fabric, terrain, setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources

No

V. Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) No Other(please specify)

Supporting Documentation Data None Entered

Supporting Documentation File Upload No files.

Assesment of Effect Assesment of Effect: No Adverse Effect

No Adverse Effect

Documentation Method Streamlined Review

Streamlined Review Streamlined Review Activity: 3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking Areas.

Explanation:

SHPO/THPO

SHPO Required: No THPO Required: No SHPO/THPO Notes:

ACHP

ACHP Participating: No ACHP Participating Notes:

Additional Consulting Parties Additional Consulting Parties: No Additional Consulting Parties Notes:

Conditions/Stipulations Recommendations for Conditions or Stipulations:

Superintendent Approval Date: 11/17/2016

Last Updated Date: 11/17/2016 Last Updated By: bridget_beers

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

Page 2 of 2PEPC - National Historic Preservation Act (Edit)

11/28/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=67300

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print

CHAT > Pavement Preservation Project (68640)

NEPA (Edit)

NEPA Status: CE Approved Current NEPA Type: CE

CE (current NEPA type)

Internal Scoping Start: 11/28/2016 Internal Scoping End: 11/28/2016 CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification:

CE Superintendent Signed Date: 11/28/2016

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety? No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers;

prime farmlands; wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988); national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2)(E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

No

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

11/28/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=68640

Last Updated Date: 11/28/2016 Last Updated By: deanna_greco

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

11/28/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=68640

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print Print Preview

CHAT > Pavement Preservation Project

National Historic Preservation Act/CRM (Edit)

Form Prepared: 11/28/2016 Data Entered By: Deanna Greco

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect:

Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer A. Has the area been surveyed? Yes B. Have NRHP resources been identified? No C. Ground disturbance involved? No

D. Archeological resources present? No

E. Historic structures/resources present?

No

F. Cultural landscapes present? No

G. Ethnographic resources affected? No Notes:

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

Archeology/ARPA/NAGPRA/Sacred Sites

Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No Started:

Completed:

Report Generated: No Where housed:

ARPA Permit Required: No Permit Number:

Question Answer Notes/Dates of contacts H. Are there any Native American sacred or culturally sensitive sites, locales (such as clan gathering or other cultural event), or landscapes present in the project area?

No

I. Is the location information associated with these sites (such as in caves, contain burials, or at the request of the Native American group(s) to be considered sensitive and/or restricted information?

No

J. Have the associated Native American groups been consulted as to the project potential impacts, if any, to sacred or sensitive sites, locales, or landscapes?

No

K. Is implementation of the project likely to disturb human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, as defined by NAGPRA?

No

L. Is an approved plan of action in place to address inadvertent discoveries of human remains, funerary objects, sacred sites, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

M. Will the project result in the intentional excavation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

11/28/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=68640

N. Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure. No O. Replace historic features/elements in kind No P. Add nonhistoric features/elements to a historic structure No Q. Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) No R. Add nonhistoric features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape

No

S. Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible No S2. Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible No T. Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources No U. Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic fabric, terrain, setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources

No

V. Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) No Other(please specify)

Supporting Documentation Data None Entered

Supporting Documentation File Upload No files.

Assesment of Effect Assesment of Effect: Undetermined Assesment Notes:

Superintendent Approval Date: 11/28/2016

Last Updated Date: 11/28/2016 Last Updated By: deanna_greco

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

11/28/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=68640

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print

CHCH > Pavement Preservation for CHCH Roads and Parking Areas (66581)

NEPA (Edit)

NEPA Status: CE Approved Current NEPA Type: CE

CE (current NEPA type)

Internal Scoping Start: 11/09/2016 Internal Scoping End: 11/23/2016 CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification:

CE Superintendent Signed Date: 12/01/2016

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety? No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers;

prime farmlands; wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988); national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2)(E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

No

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

12/21/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=66581

Last Updated Date: 12/05/2016 Last Updated By: jim_szyjkowski

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

12/21/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=66581

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print Print Preview

CHCH > Pavement Preservation for CHCH Roads and Parking Areas

National Historic Preservation Act/CRM (Edit)

Form Prepared: 11/09/2016 Data Entered By: Jim Szyjkowski

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect:

Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer A. Has the area been surveyed? Yes B. Have NRHP resources been identified? Yes C. Ground disturbance involved? Yes

D. Archeological resources present? Yes

E. Historic structures/resources present?

Yes

F. Cultural landscapes present? Yes

G. Ethnographic resources affected? No Notes:

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

Archeology/ARPA/NAGPRA/Sacred Sites

Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No Started:

Completed:

Report Generated: No Where housed:

ARPA Permit Required: No Permit Number:

Question Answer Notes/Dates of contacts H. Are there any Native American sacred or culturally sensitive sites, locales (such as clan gathering or other cultural event), or landscapes present in the project area?

No

I. Is the location information associated with these sites (such as in caves, contain burials, or at the request of the Native American group(s) to be considered sensitive and/or restricted information?

No

J. Have the associated Native American groups been consulted as to the project potential impacts, if any, to sacred or sensitive sites, locales, or landscapes?

No

K. Is implementation of the project likely to disturb human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, as defined by NAGPRA?

No

L. Is an approved plan of action in place to address inadvertent discoveries of human remains, funerary objects, sacred sites, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

M. Will the project result in the intentional excavation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

12/21/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=66581

N. Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure. No O. Replace historic features/elements in kind No P. Add nonhistoric features/elements to a historic structure No Q. Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) No R. Add nonhistoric features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape

No

S. Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible No S2. Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible No T. Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources No U. Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic fabric, terrain, setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources

No

V. Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) No Other(please specify)

Supporting Documentation Data None Entered

Supporting Documentation File Upload No files.

Assesment of Effect Assesment of Effect: No Adverse Effect

No Adverse Effect

Documentation Method Streamlined Review

Streamlined Review Streamlined Review Activity: 3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking Areas.

Explanation:

SHPO/THPO

SHPO Required: No THPO Required: No SHPO/THPO Notes:

ACHP

ACHP Participating: No ACHP Participating Notes:

Additional Consulting Parties Additional Consulting Parties: No Additional Consulting Parties Notes:

Conditions/Stipulations Recommendations for Conditions or Stipulations:

Superintendent Approval Date: 12/01/2016

Last Updated Date: 12/05/2016 Last Updated By: jim_szyjkowski

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

12/21/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=66581

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print

HOBE > Cyclic Seal Coat for HOBE's Public Roads & Parking Lots (35663)

NEPA (Edit)

NEPA Status: CE Approved Current NEPA Type: CE

CE (current NEPA type)

Internal Scoping Start: Internal Scoping End:

CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification: Cyclic maintenance of existing roads at Horseshoe Bend National Military

Park. Will include the application of a chip sealant to the existing roads and parking lots to further extend their usage by visitors and park staff. A total mileage of 2.672 miles.

CE Superintendent Signed Date: 12/13/2016

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety? No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers;

prime farmlands; wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988); national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2)(E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

No

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

12/14/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=35663

Last Updated Date: 12/13/2016 Last Updated By: barbara_tagger

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

12/14/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=35663

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print Print Preview

HOBE > Cyclic Seal Coat for HOBE's Public Roads & Parking Lots

National Historic Preservation Act/CRM (Edit)

Form Prepared:

Data Entered By: Barbara Tagger

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect:

Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer A. Has the area been surveyed?

B. Have NRHP resources been identified?

C. Ground disturbance involved?

D. Archeological resources present?

E. Historic structures/resources present?

F. Cultural landscapes present?

G. Ethnographic resources affected?

Notes:

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

Archeology/ARPA/NAGPRA/Sacred Sites Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No Started:

Completed:

Report Generated: No Where housed:

ARPA Permit Required: No Permit Number:

Question Answer Notes/Dates of contacts H. Are there any Native American sacred or culturally sensitive sites, locales (such as clan gathering or other cultural event), or landscapes present in the project area?

I. Is the location information associated with these sites (such as in caves, contain burials, or at the request of the Native American group(s) to be considered sensitive and/or restricted information?

J. Have the associated Native American groups been consulted as to the project potential impacts, if any, to sacred or sensitive sites, locales, or landscapes?

K. Is implementation of the project likely to disturb human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, as defined by NAGPRA?

L. Is an approved plan of action in place to address inadvertent discoveries of human remains, funerary objects, sacred sites, or objects of cultural patrimony?

M. Will the project result in the intentional excavation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony?

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

12/14/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=35663

N. Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure.

O. Replace historic features/elements in kind P. Add nonhistoric features/elements to a historic structure Q. Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) R. Add nonhistoric features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape S. Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible S2. Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible T. Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources U. Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic fabric, terrain, setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources V. Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) Other(please specify)

Supporting Documentation Data None Entered

Supporting Documentation File Upload No files.

Assesment of Effect Assesment of Effect: Undetermined Assesment Notes:

Superintendent Approval Date: 12/13/2016

Last Updated Date: 12/13/2016 Last Updated By: barbara_tagger

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

12/14/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=35663

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print

JICA > Pavement Preservation at Five Areas of Jimmy Carter National Historic Site (67543)

NEPA (Edit)

NEPA Status: CE Approved Current NEPA Type: CE

CE (current NEPA type)

Internal Scoping Start: 09/23/2016 Internal Scoping End: 11/18/2016 CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification: The project consists of pavement preservation, involving adding a sealer coat on existing pavement and minor pavement repairs.

CE Superintendent Signed Date: 12/21/2016

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety? No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers;

prime farmlands; wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988); national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2)(E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

No

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

12/21/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=67543

Last Updated Date: 12/21/2016 Last Updated By: barbara_judy

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

12/21/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=67543

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print Print Preview

JICA > Pavement Preservation at Five Areas of Jimmy Carter National Historic Site

National Historic Preservation Act/CRM (Edit)

Form Prepared: 09/26/2016 Data Entered By: Kevin A. Bartley

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect: The area of potential effect includes the Plains High School, Depot, and Boyhood Farm units of Jimmy Carter National Historic Site.

Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer A. Has the area been surveyed? Yes B. Have NRHP resources been identified? Yes C. Ground disturbance involved? Yes

D. Archeological resources present? Yes Notes: Multiple geophysical surveys using ground penetrating radar, auger testing, and shovel test pits were conducted at the Boyhood Farm and Plains High School (Cornelison and Meyer 1999; Lawson 1999; Prentice 2013; 2014). Cornelison, John E., Jr., and Regina M. Meyer 1999 A Systematic Archeological Survey of the Boyhood Farm, Jimmy Carter National Historic Site, SEAC Accession Number 1303. National Park Service, Southeast Archeological Center, Tallahassee. Lawson, Charles F. 1999 Trip Report on Shovel Testing and Ground Penetrating Radar Surveys at the Plains High School, Jimmy Carter National Historic Site, Plains, GA, Sept 13-15, 2009. SEAC Acc. 2263. National Park Service, Southeast Archeological Center, Tallahassee.

Prentice, Guy 2013 Trip Report on Site Condition Assessments, Jimmy Carter National Historic Site, GA, September 12, 2007, SEAC Acc. 2146, and August 28, 2013, SEAC Acc. 2568. National Park Service, Southeast Archeological Center, Tallahassee. 2014 Trip Report on Geophysical Survey Project at Jimmy Carter National Historic Site, GA, June 9-12, 2014, SEAC Acc. 2670. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee.

E. Historic structures/resources present?

No

F. Cultural landscapes present? Yes Notes:

Baseline data exists for the identified cultural landscapes associated with the Plains High School, Depot, and Boyhood Farm sites on the NPS CLI database.

G. Ethnographic resources affected? No Notes:

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

Archeology/ARPA/NAGPRA/Sacred Sites

Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No Started:

Completed:

Report Generated: No Where housed:

ARPA Permit Required: No Permit Number:

Question Answer Notes/Dates of contacts H. Are there any Native American sacred or culturally sensitive sites, locales (such as clan gathering or other cultural event), or landscapes present in the project area?

No

I. Is the location information associated with these sites (such as in caves, contain burials, or at the request of the Native American group(s) to be considered sensitive and/or restricted information?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

Page 1 of 3PEPC - National Historic Preservation Act (Edit)

12/21/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=67543

J. Have the associated Native American groups been consulted as to the project potential impacts, if any, to sacred or sensitive sites, locales, or landscapes?

No

K. Is implementation of the project likely to disturb human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, as defined by NAGPRA?

No

L. Is an approved plan of action in place to address inadvertent discoveries of human remains, funerary objects, sacred sites, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

M. Will the project result in the intentional excavation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

The Proposed action will: (Check as many as apply)

Question Answer N. Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure. No O. Replace historic features/elements in kind No P. Add nonhistoric features/elements to a historic structure No Q. Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) No R. Add nonhistoric features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape

Yes

S. Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible No S2. Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible No T. Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources Yes U. Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic fabric, terrain, setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources

No

V. Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) No Other(please specify)

Supporting Documentation Data None Entered

Supporting Documentation File Upload No files.

Assesment of Effect Assesment of Effect: No Adverse Effect

No Adverse Effect

Documentation Method Streamlined Review

Streamlined Review Streamlined Review Activity: 3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking Areas.

Explanation:

SHPO/THPO

SHPO Required: No THPO Required: No SHPO/THPO Notes:

ACHP

ACHP Participating: No ACHP Participating Notes:

Additional Consulting Parties

Page 2 of 3PEPC - National Historic Preservation Act (Edit)

Additional Consulting Parties: No Additional Consulting Parties Notes:

Conditions/Stipulations Recommendations for Conditions or Stipulations:

Superintendent Approval Date: 12/21/2016

Last Updated Date: 12/21/2016 Last Updated By: barbara_judy

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

Page 3 of 3PEPC - National Historic Preservation Act (Edit)

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print

KEMO > Pavement Preservation at KEMO (67318)

NEPA (Edit)

NEPA Status: CE Approved Current NEPA Type: CE

CE (current NEPA type)

Internal Scoping Start: 09/13/2016 Internal Scoping End:

CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification: This is cyclic maintenance on existing paved roadways.

CE Superintendent Signed Date: 12/22/2016

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety? No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers;

prime farmlands; wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988); national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2)(E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

No

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

12/22/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=67318

Last Updated Date: 12/22/2016 Last Updated By: nancy_walther

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

12/22/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=67318

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print Print Preview

KEMO > Pavement Preservation at KEMO

National Historic Preservation Act/CRM (Edit)

Form Prepared: 09/13/2016 Data Entered By: Anthony Winegar

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect: Kennesaw Mountain Drive, Cheatham Hill drive, visitor center parking, service vehicle parking, Kennesaw Mountain parking, Illinois monument parking, Cheatham Hill road parking, Burnt Hickory road parking, Old hwy 41 parking

Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer A. Has the area been surveyed? Yes B. Have NRHP resources been identified? Yes C. Ground disturbance involved? No

D. Archeological resources present? No Notes: These are all current, paved roadways that have been previously surveyed for archeological artifacts. This is a surface paving project only with no ground disturbance.

E. Historic structures/resources present?

Yes

Notes: None of the properties or resources are within the footprint of the project.

F. Cultural landscapes present? Yes

G. Ethnographic resources affected? No Notes:

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

Archeology/ARPA/NAGPRA/Sacred Sites Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No Started:

Completed:

Report Generated: No Where housed:

ARPA Permit Required: No Permit Number:

Question Answer Notes/Dates of contacts H. Are there any Native American sacred or culturally sensitive sites, locales (such as clan gathering or other cultural event), or landscapes present in the project area?

No

I. Is the location information associated with these sites (such as in caves, contain burials, or at the request of the Native American group(s) to be considered sensitive and/or restricted information?

No

J. Have the associated Native American groups been consulted as to the project potential impacts, if any, to sacred or sensitive sites, locales, or landscapes?

No

K. Is implementation of the project likely to disturb human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony, as defined by NAGPRA?

No

L. Is an approved plan of action in place to address inadvertent discoveries of human remains, funerary

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

12/22/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nhpa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=67318 objects, sacred sites, or objects of cultural patrimony?

M. Will the project result in the intentional excavation of human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony?

No

The Proposed action will: (Check as many as apply)

Question Answer N. Destroy, remove, or alter features/elements from a historic structure. No O. Replace historic features/elements in kind No P. Add nonhistoric features/elements to a historic structure No Q. Alter or remove features/elements of a historic setting or environment (inc. terrain) No R. Add nonhistoric features/elements (inc. visual, audible, or atmospheric) to a historic setting or cultural landscape

No

S. Disturb, destroy, or make archeological resources inaccessible No S2. Disturb, destroy, or make ethnographic resources inaccessible No T. Potentially affect presently unidentified cultural resources No U. Begin or contribute to deterioration of historic fabric, terrain, setting, landscape elements, or archeological or ethnographic resources

No

V. Involve a real property transaction (exchange, sale, or lease of land or structures) No Other(please specify)

Supporting Documentation Data None Entered

Supporting Documentation File Upload No files.

Assesment of Effect Assesment of Effect: No Adverse Effect

No Adverse Effect

Documentation Method Streamlined Review

Streamlined Review Streamlined Review Activity: 3. Repair/Resurfacing/Removal of Existing, Roads, Trails and Parking Areas.

Explanation:

SHPO/THPO

SHPO Required: No THPO Required: No SHPO/THPO Notes:

ACHP

ACHP Participating: No ACHP Participating Notes:

Additional Consulting Parties Additional Consulting Parties: No Additional Consulting Parties Notes:

Conditions/Stipulations Recommendations for Conditions or Stipulations:

Superintendent Approval Date: 12/22/2016

Last Updated Date: 12/22/2016 Last Updated By: nancy_walther

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print

MALU > Repave Bus A/B and Visitor Center Parking Lots (56355)

NEPA (Edit)

NEPA Status: CE Approved Current NEPA Type: CE

CE (current NEPA type)

Internal Scoping Start: 05/06/2016 Internal Scoping End: 05/06/2016 CE Citation: C.9 Repair, resurfacing, striping, installation of traffic control devices, repair/replacement of guardrails, etc., on existing roads.

CE Justification: C.9 refers to sealing and repaving existing surfaces CE Superintendent Signed Date: 05/20/2016

Extraordinary Circumstances

If implemented, would the proposal... Answer Notes

A. Have significant impacts on public health or safety? No

B. Have significant impacts on such natural resources and unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources; park, recreation, or refuge lands;

wilderness areas; wild or scenic rivers; national natural landmarks; sole or principal drinking water aquifers;

prime farmlands; wetlands (Executive Order 11990);

floodplains (Executive Order 11988); national monuments; migratory birds; and other ecologically significant or critical areas?

No

C. Have highly controversial environmental effects or involve unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of available resources (NEPA section 102(2)(E))?

No

D. Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks?

No

E. Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects?

No

F. Have a direct relationship to other actions with individually insignificant, but cumulatively significant, environmental effects?

No

G. Have significant impacts on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, as determined by either the bureau or office?

No

H. Have significant impacts on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have significant impacts on designated Critical Habitat for these species?

No

I. Violate a federal, state, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment?

No

J. Have a disproportionately high and adverse effect on low income or minority populations (EO 12898)?

No

K. Limit access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites on federal lands by Indian religious practitioners or adversely affect the physical integrity of such sacred sites (EO 130007)?

No

L. Contribute to the introduction, continued existence, or spread of noxious weeds or non-native invasive species known to occur in the area or actions that may promote the introduction, growth, or expansion of the range of such species (Federal Noxious Weed Control Act and Executive Order 13112)?

No

Home | Parks | Project / Search | Reports | Tools | Admin | Logout

11/28/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=56355

Last Updated Date: 05/20/2016 Last Updated By: leah_berry

PEPC Guide - Inside NPS - NPS.gov - Disclaimer - Accessibility - Privacy Policy

11/28/2016https://pepc.nps.gov/nepa.cfm?mode=view&projectId=56355

3 Internal Scoping / IDT Tasks

4 Natural/Cultural Compliance

5 Internal Documents / Comments

6 Public Communication

7 Public Documents & Comment Analysis

8 Close Project

Print Forms

Project Home

Compliance Summary

ESF

NEPA

Mitigations

NHPA / CRM

NHPA / CRM

Specialist Reviews Other Compliance / Consultations Print Forms

Print Print Preview

MALU > Repave Bus A/B and Visitor Center Parking Lots

National Historic Preservation Act/CRM (Edit)

Form Prepared: 05/06/2016 Data Entered By: Leah Berry

Area of Potential Effect Area of Potential Effect: The viewshed along John Wesley Dobbs, repaving will not change the view along John

Wesley Dobbs. It no longer has existing historic buildings or scenery.

Area of Potential Effect Document:

Question Answer A. Has the area been surveyed? Yes Survey Sources

Historic Landscape Report B. Have NRHP resources been identified? No C. Ground disturbance involved? No

D. Archeological resources present? No

E. Historic structures/resources present?

No

F. Cultural landscapes present? No

G. Ethnographic resources affected? No Notes:

(Subtype, have interested parties been contacted?)

Archeology/ARPA/NAGPRA/Sacred Sites Surveyor(s):

ARCH Survey Required: No Started:

Completed…