Amendment_A001.pdf

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

(d) changes any of the expressed terms, conditions or specifications of the contract.

All Technical Direction must be issued in writing, or shall be confirmed in writing by the COR within 3 working days after issuance. The Contractor shall proceed promptly with the performance of duly issued Technical Directions. However, if in the opinion of the Contractor, the direction issued but the COR is within one of the prescribed categories in (i) through (vi) above, the Contractor shall not proceed, but shall notify the Contracting Officer in writing, within 3 working days after receipt of any such direction. The Contracting Officer will determine if the Technical Direction is proper, or if a contract modification would be required to properly implement the direction. Failure of the parties to agree upon the nature of the direction or upon the contract action to be taken with respect thereto shall be subject to the clause included in Section I entitled “Disputes.”

G5. CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE (COR)

(a) The Contracting Officer is the only individual authorized to enter into or terminate this contract, modify any term or condition of this contract, waive any requirement of this contract, or accept nonconforming work delivered under this contract.

(b) The Contracting Officer shall designate a Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) by written notice to the Contractor. The COR’s responsibilities shall include technical monitoring of the Contractor’s performance and inspecting and accepting deliveries under the contract.

The COR shall be appointed in writing, at which time ALL of the responsibilities of the COR shall be detailed, and a copy of the appointment memorandum shall be furnished to the Contractor. Any changes to the COR delegation shall be made in writing, either by changes to the existing memorandum, or by issuance of a new appointment memorandum. Copies of any changes shall be provided to the Contractor.

(c) The COR is not authorized to perform, formally or informally, any of the following actions:

(1) Promise, award, agree to award, or execute any contract, contract modification, or notice of intent that changes or may change this contract;

(2) Waive or agree to any modification of the delivery schedule;

(3) Make any final decision on any contract matter subject to the Disputes Clause;

(4) Terminate, for any reason, the Contractor’s right to proceed, or issue any order causing the Contractor to stop work; or

(5) Obligate in any way, the payment of money by the Government.

(d) The Contractor shall comply with the written or oral direction of the Contracting Officer or authorized representative(s) acting within the scope and authority of the appointment memorandum. The Contractor need not proceed with direction that it considers to have been

Amendment A001 1/5/2018

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text by

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers out of scope

Volume I – Non-price Factors. (Parts I and II), which shall be provided in the form of 6 (six) physical copies and 1 (one) CD (or thumb drive). This volume shall consist of two parts and they should be bound together. No cost/price data shall be included in any part of Volume I.

Volume I shall consist of the following, not to exceed 50 pages total (combined) between Part I and Part II:

(a) Part I – Technical Approach

(b) Part II – Past Performance

NOTE: The Offeror shall indicate under Volume I of the proposal, the name(s) and title(s) of the person(s) who prepared the proposal and his/her relationship to the offering organization.

Part I – Technical Approach

Describe your overall approach to administer and perform the work detailed in Task Order 001 and Task Order 002.

Provide a narrative describing your overall understanding of the following concepts.

o Earned Value o Change Management o Primavera modules of EPPM Client, Web and Team Member and their relationship with each other o Design or construction project work flow

Provide a staffing plan that describes what your approach will be to staff the four different locations (Central Federal Lands (CFL) in Lakewood, CO; Western Federal Lands (WFL) in Vancouver, WA; Eastern Federal Lands (EFL) in Sterling, VA; and HQ in Washington, D.C.) as needed. All System Administrators and Schedulers will be onsite for the office holding that Task Order. Additional positions can work remotely, with the willingness and ability to travel to individual offices to perform specific services, as needed.

o Demonstrate how you will retain, recruit, and maintain staffing during the life of the contract.

o Describe how you will address employee performance conduct issues and poor/unsatisfactory performance.

Provide resumes of proposed staff and subcontractors and their technical qualifications to perform the work of the base contract. Resumes should demonstrate relevant experience, qualifications, education, formal training, and degrees that are focused on project management and project controls (if obtained).

Additionally, include details that show the employee has communication skills and experience working as a teammate.

Provide a narrative describing innovative solutions that were developed and proposed in previous situations to advance the efficiency of scheduling operations;

including system setup (Enterprise Project Structure (EPS), Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), and other settings), reporting, and processes and procedures.

Amendment A001 1/5/2018

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

SECTION M - Evaluation Factors for Award

M.1 BEST VALUE EVALUATION

(a) Award will be made to the offeror(s): whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements; who is determined responsible in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.1 by possessing the financial and other capabilities to fulfill the requirements of the contract; and whose proposal is evaluated by an integrated assessment of cost/price and non-price evaluation factors, to provide the best value to the Government.

(b) Evaluation of Proposals

(1) Initial Evaluation of Proposals. All offers received will be evaluated in accordance with the stated evaluation factors. The Government intends to make an award without discussions based solely upon initial proposals. Therefore, offerors should ensure that their initial proposal constitutes their best offer in terms of both price and the technical solution being proposed.

Notwithstanding, the Government reserves the right to hold discussions if determined to be in the Government’s best interest to do so.

(2) Discussions/Final Proposal Revisions. Except as described in (iii) below, if discussions are held, the Contracting Officer will establish a competitive range comprised of the most highly rated proposals. If the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly-rated proposals. Only those offerors in the competitive range will be offered an opportunity to participate further in the procurement.

(i) The Contracting Officer will engage in discussions with all offerors in the competitive range in accordance with FAR 15.306. At the conclusion of discussions, a final common cut-off date for submission of final proposal revisions will be established. Those offerors remaining in the competitive range will be invited to submit Final Proposal Revisions.

(ii) Final Evaluation of Offers. A final proposal evaluation will be performed after receipt of Final Proposal Revisions.

M.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

In determining which proposal provides the best value to the Government, the Government will conduct an integrated evaluation and assessment of offers. Proposals will be evaluated on three factors:

Amendment A001 1/5/2018

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers Typewritten Text

Jeremiah.Rogers

If

CENTRAL FEDERAL LANDS HIGHWAY DIVISION

12300 WEST DAKOTA AVENUE, SUITE 360

LAKEWOOD, COLORADO 80228

ATTENTION: JEREMIAH ROGERS

1:

Remove page 15 and replace with new page 15. If contractors receive technical direction that they feel is out of scope, they will report this to the CO.

Remove page 59 and replace with new page 59. System Administrator is not a labor classification in this IDIQ.

Remove page 66 and replace with new page 66. An error was deleted (there is no section (iii) in this section).

*FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THIS AMENDMENT IN BLOCK 19 OF THE SF 1442 BY THE DESIGNATED DATE AND HOUR SPECIFIED IN THE SOLICITATION MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR BID (REFER TO ITEM 11.)