QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS_Additional_Clarification_for_previous_question_8.6.13.pdf
PDF 83 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CA PFH 112-1(3) South Fork Smith River Road - George E Tyron Bridge Replacement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH68-13-R-00010
About this file
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS_Additional Clarification for previous question_8.6.13
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS_8.6.13.pdf | ||
| QUESTIONS_AND_ANSWERS_8.1.13.pdf | ||
| CA_PFH_112-1(3)__Pre-proposal_Meeting_Notes_Sign_In_7.23.13.pdf | ||
| APPENDIX_A_Continued..pdf | ||
| APPENDIX_A.pdf | ||
| DTFH68-13-R-00010_RFP_South_Fork_Smith_River_Road_7.1.16.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
DTFH68-13-R-00010
SOUTH FORK SMITH RIVER
This question is being updated. Previous answer was only; yes.
1.Referring to bid item 55302-3300 (Pre-cast, pre-stressed concrete AASHTO girder), can the
Type I AASHTO girder be replaced with a Caltrans approved equal?
Answer: suggest bidders bid the girder shown and if they want to make substitutes that would be in the alternate technical concepts section. We would assume contractors would also consider lengthening the spans and propose a substitute girder in that section. We want contractors to price what we show on the drawings for the bid items and show any improvements elsewhere.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .