Drainage Master Plan RFP.pdf

TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE

DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN UPDATE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

April 2025

Town of Breckenridge

Request for Proposals

Drainage Master Plan Update

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

SECTION I. TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. INVITATION

2. PROCUREMENT SCHEDULE

3. FORM OF RESPONSE

4. SELECTION PROCESS

5. INQUIRIES

6. ADDENDA

7. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS

8. DISCLOSURE OF PROPOSAL CONTENTS

9. ORIGINAL PROPOSAL

10. INVESTIGATION OF CONDITIONS

11. WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL

12. SINGLE PROPOSAL RESPONSE

13. CONFLICTS AND INCONSISTENCIES

14. CONTRACT AWARD

15. NEWS RELEASES

16. COST OF PROPOSAL PREPARATION

17. OMISSION OF DETAILS

SECTION II. SCOPE OF SERVICES

BACKGROUND

SUMMARY OF WORK REQUIRED

SECTION III. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL ATTACHMENTS

1. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

2. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF RFP PACKET, SAMPLE AGREEMENT AND

ADDENDA

EXHIBIT A – 1988 DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN

Section I. TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Invitation

Qualified individuals, firms or consortiums are invited to submit a sealed proposal to the Town of

Breckenridge (hereinafter referred to as “TOWN”) to perform design services for developing a Drainage

Master Plan (“PROJECT”) for the TOWN.

The purpose of this solicitation is to bind a competent, experienced consultant into a formal Agreement with the TOWN to perform the work described in this Request for Proposals and the attachments hereto.

Proposers are cautioned to read the entire Request for Proposal, noting all particular submittal requirements, including both substance and format. Failure to provide all requested information in the manner required might be cause for rejection of proposal at the sole discretion of the TOWN.

This invitation should not be construed as a commitment of any kind on the part of the TOWN, nor does it commit the TOWN to pay for any costs incurred in the submission of a proposal package, nor for any costs incurred prior to the execution of a formal Agreement.

2. Procurement Schedule

To be considered, proposals must be received by the TOWN at the following location before 10:00 a.m.

MST on Friday May 30 at:

websiteclerk@townofbreckenridge.com

Procedural and technical questions are to be submitted to Aaron Neff, 970-453-3174, aneff@townofbreckenridge.com.

Any proposal received after that time shall not be considered, but shall be returned unopened to the proposer. Telegraphic or fax submittals shall not be considered.

Prospective proposers are advised that the TOWN shall make a good faith effort to adhere to the following schedule for this procurement:

Deadline for questions May 16, 2025 5:00 p.m.

Proposals Due May 30, 2025 10:00 a.m.

mailto:websiteclerk@townofbreckenridge.com mailto:aneff@townofbreckenridge.com

Interviews June 2025

Contract Award July 2025

However, TOWN shall be under no obligation to comply with the schedule shown above, provided that all prospective proposers or other interested parties known to the TOWN shall be notified equally of changes made to this schedule by the TOWN within a reasonable time after such changes are made. In no event shall any proposer have any redress to the TOWN, be it financial or otherwise, in the event that the

TOWN alters this schedule in any way. Responsibility for submitting the proposal to the TOWN on or before the above stated time shall remain solely and strictly that of the proposer. The TOWN shall in no way be responsible for delays in the delivery of any proposal by U.S. mail or any other method of conveyance. The TOWN shall not be responsible for premature opening of proposals that are not marked properly as described above.

3. Form of Response

The proposal shall contain the following information and attachments:

Cover Letter: Identify the proposer’s name, mailing address, telephone number and contact person(s). The letter must be signed by the proposer, and should be limited to two (2) pages. Consortiums, joint ventures or teams submitting proposals, although permitted and encouraged, will not be considered to be responsive unless it is established that all contractual responsibility shall rest solely with one firm or one legal entity, which shall not be a subsidiary or affiliate with limited resources. Indicate the entity responsible for execution on behalf of the team.

Organizational Information: Provide a statement of the proposer’s corporate status and background, including but not necessarily limited to the following: Legal status; organizational structure; current list of owners, officers and principals; management philosophy; brief history; type(s) of business conducted;

business locations and facilities; customer base; and ability to obtain the required insurance.

References: List any similar projects with municipal stormwater management and drainage master planning and experience in Colorado mountain towns that have been performed by the proposer.

Provide the following information for each reference:

Client Name: ______________________________________

Address: ______________________________________

Contact Person: __________________________Telephone: (___) _____________

Project Dates: _______________________________

Project Description ____________________________________________

Original Project Budget: ______________________________

Final Project Cost: ______________________________

Explanation of variation from original budget to final project cost: ___________

Project Manager and Personnel: Describe the qualifications, experience, and availability of the proposer’s candidate for project manager. Proposers are advised that failure to provide the individual selected as project manager as indicated in the proposal may constitute cause for cancellation of contract award or termination of any Agreement between the TOWN and the proposer. Additionally, describe other key personnel who will contribute to the Project with appropriate expertise in municipal facility operations, design and construction. Such descriptions shall include, but not necessarily be limited to name and job title, years of experience, qualifications, expertise, and availability. Include resumes as available.

Project Approach: Describe the approach that the proposer would take in designing the project to meet the TOWN needs. Project approach should be concise. Design processes and elements should be detailed in this section of the proposal. Any other creative or innovative ideas should be detailed in this section.

Project Schedule: Provide an estimated schedule that includes constraints, critical issues, meeting dates, review periods and delivery of documents. The proposer is encouraged to review the site and attend the pre-proposal conference to determine the scope of the project.

Fee Schedule: Proposal shall include a fee schedule for each phase. Provide a complete line item budget for the work with explanations as necessary to complete the Project as specified in the RFP, its attachments and other documents referenced. Each proposer shall certify that its price proposal shall remain valid for a period of at least one hundred and twenty (120) days. In the event that a contract award by the TOWN is delayed beyond the 120-day period, such award shall be conditioned upon the proposer's acceptance.

Financial Information: The Town may request that the proposer provide a statement of the proposer’s financial condition relative to the performance of this Project, specifically addressing ability to finance and maintain cash flow during the Project. This may include an audited financial statement prepared by a certified public accountant, consisting of balance sheet, income statement, applicable notes and disclosures, and statement of changes in financial position, of the proposer’s firm covering the past three

(3) fiscal years (or since commencement of operations, if less than three years), and an audited financial statement of any sub-consultant(s) proposed to perform twenty percent (20%) or more of the Project work, covering the past two (2) fiscal years. The most recent year’s financial statements must include either an Auditor's Report Letter or an Accountant's Review Letter.

In the event the proposer intends to borrow any funds to finance any portion of the work pertaining to this

Project, a letter of intent from the bank or other lending agency must be attached, indicating the minimum amount which will be loaned and the applicable percentage rate of interest to be charged. The letter of intent may contain the qualification that the loan will only be consummated upon award of a contract by the TOWN.

Financial information submitted to establish the financial capability, price proposal, overhead rates, and other aspects of the proposer’s fiscal condition shall be handled as confidential data and utilized on a

"need-to-know" basis for proposal evaluation. The TOWN shall make all reasonable efforts to avoid disclosure to parties unrelated to the proposal evaluation process.

Statement of Insurance: The proposer must provide the minimum insurance coverage levels specified below and give evidence of same with copies of certificate(s) of insurance or letter(s) of intent to provide insurance from competent provider(s) doing business in the State of Colorado with an “A” rating as shown in the most recent edition of “Best’s Insurance Reports.”

General Liability $1,200,000 per claim and $1,200,000 aggregate.

Workers Compensation Insurance per Colorado Revised Statutes.

Comprehensive Automobile Liability $1,200,000 per claim and $1,200,000 aggregate.

Attachment A: Acknowledgment of Receipt of RFP Packet and Addenda: This form must be completed and signed by the proposer, and attached to the proposal. The form is attached to this RFP.

Any proposal not submitted in this format shall be deemed to be non-responsive and shall not be considered further by the TOWN. The signer of the proposal must declare that the only person(s), company or parties interested in the contract as principals are named herein; that it is, in all respects, fair and in good faith without collusion or fraud; and that the signer of the proposal has the authority to bind the principal firm.

4. Selection Process

Each responsive proposal received by the TOWN shall be evaluated in a consistent manner as described in this subsection. A responsive proposal is one which complies with all material aspects of the solicitation, both as to the method and timeliness of submission, and as to the substance of any resulting contract.

Prospective proposers are advised to submit all required forms, attachments, insurance certificates, and other information as requested in the RFP. An evaluation committee comprised of TOWN staff will review all responsive proposals. Proposals will be evaluated on the completeness, ideas, qualifications, experience, schedule and price.

At the TOWN’s option, the best qualified firms may be invited to participate in oral interviews with the evaluation committee for the purpose of clarifying and confirming offerings and assertions made in the proposals.

The TOWN reserves the right to delay making an award as necessary to permit proper study and analysis of all proposals received, to split award on proposals, to reject any or all proposals received, and to make a pre-award survey to determine the capability of any or all proposers. The TOWN reserves the right to reject any or all proposals if it believes there is a sound documented business reason for doing so, and to negotiate matters of Consultant performance, project schedule and other issues not directly related to the proposal price submitted prior to awarding a contract. The TOWN further reserves the right to cancel the procurement process at any time during the evaluation process if it appears that the proposals received are not suitable for any reason whatsoever.

5. Inquiries

Any and all proposers may make inquiries in writing to TOWN at any time prior to May 16, 2025. Any written question of a proposer regarding the meaning or interpretation of the RFP, work scope, specifications, etc., must be submitted to the TOWN prior to the above-specified date. All clarifications given to any prospective proposer shall be similarly furnished to all prospective proposers in summary form as an addendum to this RFP if the lack of such information could reasonably be considered prejudicial towards uninformed proposers. No technical assistance shall be given by the TOWN to any proposer in preparation of its proposal.

Written inquiries shall be directed to:

Aaron Neff

970-453-3174 aneff@townofbreckenridge.com

The TOWN shall provide a copy of its written response to any inquiries received to all proposers made known to the TOWN.

6. Addenda

Any or all changes, additions, or clarifications in connection with this RFP shall be issued by the TOWN in the form of written addenda. Each proposer must sign the “Acknowledgment of Receipt of RFP

Addenda” form (Attachment A) and submit the executed form with its proposal. Oral comments, responses and/or representations shall not be binding upon the TOWN.

7. Consideration of Proposals

The TOWN reserves all rights to investigate the qualifications of any and all individuals and firms under consideration, to perform a financial audit of one or more firms, to confirm any part of the information furnished in a proposal, and to require further evidence of managerial, financial or professional capabilities which are considered necessary for the successful performance of work described in this RFP.

The TOWN reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive informalities and minor irregularities in proposals received.

8. Disclosure of Proposal Contents

All proposals and supporting documents, except such information that discloses proprietary or financial information submitted in response to qualification statements, becomes public information held in mailto:aneff@townofbreckenridge.com custody of the TOWN after the proposal submittal date given in this RFP. The TOWN assumes no liability for the use or disclosure of technical or cost data submitted by any proposer.

Nevertheless, if a proposal contains information that the respondent does not want disclosed to the public, or used for any purpose other than the evaluation of this offer, all such information must be indicated with the following or similar statement:

"The information contained on pages ________ shall not be duplicated, used in whole or in part for any purpose other than to evaluate the proposal provided; that if a contract is awarded to this firm as a result of the submission of such information, the Town of Breckenridge shall have the right to duplicate, use or disclose this information to the extent provided in the contract. This restriction does not limit the Town of Breckenridge’s right to use the information contained herein if obtained from another source."

All such nondisclosure items specified in the proposal shall be subject to disclosure as provided in Part 2 of Article 72 of Title 24, C.R.S. ("The Colorado Public Records Act") or as otherwise provided by law.

9. Original Proposal

The successful proposal must be an original work product of the submitting individual, firm or team.

Copying, paraphrasing, or otherwise using significant portions of the work product of another organization when presenting a proposal to the TOWN shall not be permitted. Failure to adhere to this instruction may result in the rejection of the proposal.

10. Investigation of Conditions

All proposers are encouraged to review this RFP carefully and to investigate all conditions involved in the execution of work. The selected firm shall not be allowed additional compensation for items on which it has failed to inform itself prior to the opening of proposals.

11. Withdrawal of Proposal

Prior to the due date indicated in the RFP packet, any proposer may withdraw its proposal submitted to the TOWN by written, telegraphic, or fax notification, or in person by a firm principal or authorized representative, provided his/her identity is made known and a receipt is signed for the return of the proposal. Regardless of form, such notice must be in written form and received by the TOWN prior to the hour and date specified for receipt of proposals. After proposals are opened as prescribed herein, no proposal may be withdrawn for a period of one hundred and twenty (120) calendar days. Negligence on the part of a proposer in preparing its proposal shall not confer a right of withdrawal after the date proposals are received by the TOWN.

12. Single Proposal Response

In the event that only one (1) proposal is received in response to this RFP, the TOWN may require assistance from the single responsive and responsible proposer in the preparation of a proposal price analysis in order to determine whether the single proposal received by the TOWN is fair and reasonable.

13. Conflicts and Inconsistencies

In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between any of the RFP and attachments, including drawings, specifications, and the Sample Agreement or Appendix thereto, the TOWN shall resolve such conflict or inconsistency and provide written notice of the single interpretation to all known proposers by written addendum.

14. Contract Award

The TOWN maintains the right, but shall be under no obligation, to award a contract to the responsive and responsible proposer whose offer is deemed by the TOWN to be most advantageous to the TOWN as determined by capability, qualifications and other factors set forth herein. Proposers are hereby advised that contract award is subject to approval by the Town Council. It is the intent of the Town to enter into an agreement for Phase 1 services with the selected consultant, followed by Phase 2 design services once project tasks and phasing are clearly defined.

15. News Releases

Written approval by the TOWN is required prior to any public disclosure regarding this RFP or any subsequent awards.

16. Cost of Proposal Preparation

The TOWN shall not be liable for any costs or expenses incurred for preparation of proposals submitted in response to this RFP or for any other cost incurred prior to issuance of a formal Notice to Proceed.

Proposers shall not include such expenses as part of the price proposed. The TOWN shall be held harmless and free from any and all liability, claims or expenses whatsoever incurred by, or on behalf of, any person or organization responding to this RFP.

17. Omission Of Details

No advantage shall be taken by any proposer as a result of the omission of any parts or details which are necessary for the provision of detailed design and engineering services even though such details may not be mentioned in this RFP.

Section II. SCOPE OF SERVICES

Background

The TOWN is seeking to update its Drainage Master Plan to identify the drainageways, existing drainage patterns and existing drainage infrastructure within the TOWN limits and provide recommendations on drainageway improvements. The most recent Drainage Master Plan was developed in 1988 and it is included in Exhibit A. Due to climate change, development, and modern standards, the TOWN would like to update the current plan to reflect these changes. Climate shifts have been observed to include more extreme weather, which can overwhelm outdated systems and increase flood risks and erosion. The

TOWN’s growth and infrastructure expansions have also altered natural water flow, creating a need for a drainage system that reflects current development. New regulations and standards in stormwater management emphasize sustainability and resilience and will protect water quality and habitats by controlling pollution, benefiting the local environment. An accurately mapped and updated drainage master plan will also improve public safety, and proactive planning reduces costly emergency repairs.

Summary of Work Required

This project involves developing a full Drainage Master Plan for the TOWN, as described herein. The plan will aim to reduce pollution in urban stormwater runoff to local waterways and update the mapping of the drainageways. The plan will begin with a review of existing data, including existing regulations, a comparison of regulations to that of similar communities, current relevant plans, existing mapping, and the performance of the existing stormwater system. The Drainage Master Plan shall include:

1. Review of Existing Data and Mapping

1.1. Review State and Local Laws and Ordinances

The consultant shall review existing state and local ordinances and regulations that pertain to stormwater management including flood control, floodplain management, water quality, erosion control, and maintenance. A summary report shall be provided as outlined in Task 1.7 of the

Scope of Services.

1.2. Review Local Requirements of Similar Communities

The consultant shall conduct a high-level review of the stormwater requirements for similar municipalities. The review shall include ordinances, land development regulations, criteria manuals, or other stormwater requirements. The review shall include requirements for flood control, floodplain management, water quality, erosion control, and maintenance. The consultant shall prepare a technical memorandum that summarizes and compares the requirements of each community.

1.3. Review Geographical Information on Existing Stormwater Systems

1.3.1. Existing Stormwater Systems

The TOWN currently has very limited data for existing stormwater systems. One of the main goals of the updated drainage master plan will be to identify and map all the

TOWN’s existing stormwater infrastructure in Task 1.4.

1.3.2. Regional Impacts

This task includes reviewing the topography surrounding the Town and identifying the size and relative impact that regional sub-watersheds have on the Town stormwater system.

1.4. Mapping

With the limited existing stormwater systems data, one of the main goals of the updated drainage master plan with be to collect survey and GIS data of all existing stormwater infrastructure. The consultant shall collect GIS and survey data for stormwater inlets, manholes, pipes, jurisdictional boundaries, receiving waters, outfalls, retention/detention ponds, open channels, other related system components, and any other missing elements part of the existing stormwater drainage infrastructure. Survey shall be collected for structures to determine locations and inverts. Vertical survey accuracy shall be +/- 0.05 feet. At a minimum, GIS files should be named and attributed consistent with the Town’s GIS standards (e.g. with structure identification, sizes, materials, inverts, manhole and grate elevations, condition, and ownership). Open channels should be captured by surveying cross-sections at 100-foot intervals. Outfalls should include identification of receiving waters.

1.5. Review Flood History Data

Consultant shall summarize flooding history (including localized flooding during minor storm events) in the Town based on available data.

1.6. Evaluate Changes in Rainfall Patterns

Consultant shall review existing sources of precipitation data to determine the design storm events to be used for planning and designing stormwater improvements for both water quality and flood management. Consultant shall evaluate the potential impacts of climate change influenced rainfall on minor and major system performance and alternative assessment for measures that could “absorb” the incremental increases in rainfall expected in the future.

Consultant shall review possible future rainfall scenarios to understand the range and uncertainty associated with estimates from various available tools. Consultant shall recommend the most suitable data and method(s) to use for design calculations, modeling, etc.

1.7. The consultant shall summarize the findings of all data review described in Section 1. The report shall identify potential areas of improvement, data gaps, and other successful industry practices for operations and regulations based on documentation, noting data source and comparison to industry best practices and/or communities’ legal structure/programs. This report shall include, and may not be limited to, the following:

• Summary and evaluation of local and State rules and laws (Task 1.1)

• Summary and comparison of requirements and resources for similar communities

(Task 1.2)

• Summary of geographical information and regional impacts (Task 1.3)

• Summary of new GIS and survey data collected (Task 1.4)

• Summary of flooding incidents with locations (Task 1.5)

• Recommended data and methods to be used as the TOWN’s standards for planning and rulemaking related to rainfall and flood management (Task 1.6)

Task 1 Deliverables

• Summary Report

• GIS data files consistent with TOWN standards and compatible with the TOWN’s system geodatabase/map

2. Develop Drainage Master Plan

2.1. Drainage Model and Master Plan

The Consultant shall prepare a stormwater model using results of the storm water system mapping information collected in Task 1.4. The model shall use the updated design storm events (and climate change influenced events) determined in Task 1.6 to determine the runoff from each drainage basin delineated in Task 1.4 and shall route runoff through the stormwater system to determine areas of potential flooding.

2.1.1. Calculate System Capacity (Hydraulic Modeling)

The model shall generate hydrographs (estimates of runoff vs. time) for each sub-basin.

The Consultant shall create a network of surface water features within the hydraulic model to simulate the TOWN’s storm sewer system and route the hydrographs through the system. All existing detention ponds shall be included in the model. Areas where flooding occurs shall be identified and larger pipes shall be modeled to determine the size that prevents street flooding.

2.1.2. Model Calibration and Alternatives Analysis

The Consultant shall calibrate the model using historic rainfall data and documented levels of flooding from previous storms events. A futures conditions model shall be run using future impervious values. Flooding hazards under future development conditions will be identified and mapped. The Consultant shall determine impact of future development and recommend improvements. The following strategies shall be considered for the development of recommendations for stormwater infrastructure to safely convey storm runoff from future development:

• Optimizing existing storm sewer system including detention ponds, inlets, pipes, and channels,

• Additional detention,

• Additional conveyance,

• Increased size of existing conveyances,

• Diverting storm flows out of the study area, and

• Low-impact development strategies

The Consultant, with input from the TOWN, shall develop proposed alternatives to address flooding issues within the study area. The Consultant shall model proposed alternatives to determine their performance under minor and major storm events.

2.1.3. Pollutant Loading Analysis

The Consultant shall use the model to estimate the current pollutant loading and evaluate the performance of potential water quality improvements. The model shall include pollutant loading based on land use data provided by the TOWN and data gathered during Task 1.4. The model shall consider the effects of existing and proposed water quality improvements on pollutant discharges. The model shall generate pollutant hydrographs (concentration vs. time) and evaluate the performance of proposed low impact development (LID) controls.

2.1.4. The Consultant shall prepare conceptual-level cost estimates for recommended improvements based on the analyses conducted in Tasks 2.1.2 and 2.1.3.

Task 2.1 Deliverables

• Master Plan Report with summary of methodology, flooding areas identified, recommendations for improvements, including construction cost estimates

• Model files (in public-sourced format)

2.2. Formation of Focus Groups for Stormwater Manual Development

2.2.1. Evaluate Potential Code Conflicts

The goal of this task is to ensure that Town codes and Land Development Regulations

(LDRs) related to stormwater management do not conflict with other land development codes, including the subdivision regulations, zoning codes, street and parking design code, building codes, any applicable Town requirements, and others.

The Consultant shall coordinate with TOWN staff and/or the internal Focus Group regarding the potential for changes to LDRs and Code. The Consultant shall draft a preliminary Codes Integration Roadmap for review by the Focus Groups. The Roadmap shall identify code conflicts, and barriers and opportunities to potential new stormwater quantity and quality requirements. The Consultant shall provide recommendations for potential changes to address conflicts, barriers, and opportunities, in the following general categories:

• code revisions,

• document creation,

• policy development, and

• incentive programs.

Each recommendation shall include an indication of “perceived difficulty for change”, “priority for change”, and “need for external stakeholder input”. The Consultant shall prepare one draft of the Roadmap for review and comment by the Focus Groups before finalization of the document.

2.2.2. Evaluate Use of Incentive Program to Encourage “Beyond Minimum” Practices by

Developers

The Consultant shall identify areas of opportunity and incentives for enhanced stormwater management, especially where increased flood control can improve current drainage, flood, or pollutant issues. Potential incentives include and are not limited to development incentives, grants, stormwater and other fee discounts, rebates and installation financing, and awards and recognition programs. The goal of the exercise is to look for potential opportunities to improve stormwater management requirements on both public and private land development projects.

Task 2.2 Deliverables

• Meeting facilitation for up to five (5) meetings with meeting minutes and

PowerPoint presentations.

2.3. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping

2.3.1. Evaluate Town Facilities and Operations

The Consultant shall work with the TOWN to determine which facilities and programs should be evaluated for pollution prevention and good housekeeping practices.

2.3.2. Recommend Improvements, including Cost and Staffing Requirements.

Based on the inspection of the Town facilities and operations, Consultant shall recommend improvements to prevent, or minimize stormwater pollution from Town facilities, including budgetary costs and staffing requirements.

Task 2.3 Deliverables

• Inventory of TOWN facilities and operations

• Prioritization factors for evaluating each site/activity

• Site inspections (up to 5 sites, or more only if budget allows)

• Compiled inspections report

• Consolidated summary report, incorporating documentation of visits, ranking process, findings, recommendations, costs and staffing impacts.

2.4. Monitoring

2.4.1. Recommended Stormwater Monitoring Program

The TOWN currently does not have a monitoring program for stormwater. The consultant shall develop a recommended monitoring program with metrics to evaluate and determine the success of the stormwater program.

Task 2.4 Deliverables

• Technical memorandum for recommended monitoring program.

• Scope of work and cost estimate for a pilot monitoring program based on the recommendations.

Section III. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL ATTACHMENTS

1. Proposal Submittal Checklist

This form must be completed and returned with the proposal submittal.

Attachment

Description

Proposer’s

Initials

Town’s

Initials

Signed Cover Letter

Organizational Information

References

Project Management and Personnel

Financial Information

Statement of Insurance

Acknowledgment of Receipt of RFP Packet and Addenda

Signature of

Proposer________________________________

Date: ____________________________________

2. Acknowledgment of receipt of RFP Packet, Sample Agreement and Addenda

The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the Town of Breckenridge Request for Proposals (RFP) packet for the Second Water Plant Feasibility Study, Sample Agreement, and the addenda issued during the procurement process.

Addendum #1: dated

Addendum #2: dated

Addendum #3: dated

Failure to acknowledge receipt of the proposal packet, sample Agreement, and all addenda may cause the proposal to be considered non-responsive to this solicitation.

Name of Proposer:

Signature of Proposer:

Date:

EXHIBIT A – 1988 DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN