DRAFT Statement of Work.pdf

v4.10_DECEMBER2025

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)/PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

Mechanical Fabrication

1.0 Background

The Undersea Warfare Electromagnetic Systems Department (Code 34) of the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport (NUWCDIVNPT) is tasked by Naval Systems Commands (SYSCOMs), Type Commanders (TYCOMs), Navy Cyber Warfare Development Group (NCWDG), Naval Research Lab (NRL), Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), Office of Naval Research (ONR), Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Naval Special Warfare Development Group (NWDG), Special Operations Command (SOCOM), Naval Cyber Warfare Command (NCWC), and Other Government Agencies to perform a wide range of programmatic, engineering and technical functions to support the research, design, development, production, fielding, maintenance and improvement of Electromagnetic Warfare systems, subsystems, and components.

The Undersea Weapons and Defensive Systems Department (Code 85) of the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport (NUWCDIVNPT) is tasked by PEO UWS, PEO USC, PEO RAS, Office of Naval Research (ONR), and Other Government Agencies to perform a wide range of programmatic, engineering and technical functions to support the research, design, development, production, fielding, maintenance and improvement of Undersea Weapons and Defensive systems, subsystems, and components.

This SOW encompasses build-to-print, firm fixed price (FFP) hardware fabrication and certification.

1.1 Places of Performance

All work shall be performed at the contractor’s site.

1.2 Authorized Users

NUWCDIVNPT Code 34, Code 85.

1.3 Sponsors

SYSCOMs; TYCOMs; NRL; ONI; ONR; DLA; NWDG; SOCOM; NCWC; NAVSEA/PEOSUB PMS392, PMS394, PMS397, PMS435, PMS425, PMS 450, PMS4010; Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR) PMWs 120, 130, 150, 160, 170, 770, and 790. NAVSEA/PEO, PEO UWS, PEO

USC, PEO RAS.

1.4 Types of Funding

Operation and Maintenance, Navy (OMN), Other Procurement, Navy (OPN), Ship Construction, Navy (SCN), Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense Agencies (RDDA) and Research Development Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Naval Sea Based Deterrent Fund (NSBDF), Defense Working Capital Fund (DWCF).

2.0 Scope

This FFP Multiple-Award Blank Purchase Agreement (BPA) is for mechanical fabrication of hardware. The Contractor shall fabricate, produce, assemble, test, package, and deliver hardware in accordance with drawings provided by the Government. The following services may be required in support of this effort:

• Computer Numerical Control (CNC), Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM)

• Welding and Braising

• Milling, Planing, Machining

• Shearing, Shaping, Rolling, Bending

• Cutting, Drilling, Boring, Tapping, Threading, broaching and threaded insert installation

• Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM)

• Grinding, Honing, Polishing

• Plating, Anodizing, Coating, Painting

• Assembling multiple components into assemblies with bolts, screws, or other fasteners

• Non-Destructive Testing (NTD) including Penetrant Testing (PT), Magnetic Particle

Testing (MT), Ultrasonic Testing (UT), and X-Ray Testing.

• Quality inspection of all manufactured parts

• Additive manufacturing

• Waterjet

The Government anticipates that the preponderance of BPA calls will require use of the following metals: mild steel, medium steel, high tensile steel, stainless steel and aluminum. The Government anticipates that High Yield Steel (HYS), High-Strength Low-Alloy (HSLA) steel, also known as microalloyed (MA) steel, super alloy and special metals such as Titanium, Inconel and Monel (K-500) may also be required; however, use of these metals is anticipated to be less frequent.

All items shall be fabricated and configured in accordance with the Government-provided drawings. Prior to award of BPA calls, the BPA holders shall document all discrepancies, objections, issues, problems, questions and concerns with the drawings or requirements, and all requests for variations, substitutions, or changes in their quotes. No modifications, variations, substitutions, or changes will be made to any drawing or product unless and only when approved in advance and in writing by the Government. The BPA holders shall provide all of the necessary resources including personnel, tools, equipment, computers, software, machinery, test equipment, consumables, and facilities necessary to successfully complete and deliver the hardware.

2.1 Program or Systems Supported

These Electromagnetic Warfare Systems are divided into the following four major areas:

• Electronic Warfare

• Imaging

• Communications

• Special Projects

Electronic Warfare and Imaging Systems Program Executive Office Submarines (PEO SUB) Program/Project Manager, Ship (PMS) 435 is the Participating Acquisition and Resource Manager (PARM) for Submarine Electronic Warfare (EW) and Imaging systems. PMS 435 has designated NUWCDIVNPT Code 34 as their Technical Direction Agent (TDA), Acquisition Engineering Agent (AEA), In-Service Engineering Agent (ISEA), and Software Support Agent (SSA) for submarine EW and Imaging systems. As such, NUWCDIVNPT has responsibility for EW and Imaging system hardware and software design, development, prototype, testing, integration, procurement, fielding, and in-service support.

Communications Program Manager, Warfare (PMW) 770 is the PARM for Submarine Communications Systems. PMW 770 has designated NUWCDIVNPT Code 34 as their TDA and AEA for Submarine Communications Systems. Additionally, PEO C4I PMW 120, 130, 150, 160, 170, and 790, and PEOSUB PMS 392, 397, & 450 provide tasking to NUWCDIVNPT in support of internal and external submarine communications. NUWCDIVNPT Code 34 has responsibility for system and subsystem design development, production integration, testing, and in-service support of Submarine Communication Systems.

Special Projects ONI designated Code 34 as the TDA, AEA and ISEA for special mission augmentation systems, subsystems, and sensors. As such, Code 34 is responsible for the development of prospective systems, in-service engineering support for existing systems, and quick reaction support to the Fleet based upon new and emergent operational requirements.

3.0 Applicable Documents

The contractor shall perform the tasking required in Section 4.0 in accordance with (IAW) the below Applicable Documents (ADs).

NUMBER TITLE REVISION/

DATE

3.1 ASME Y14.100 Engineering Drawing Practices 2017

3.2 ASME Y14.35M Revision of Engineering Drawings and

Associated Documents

3.3 ASME Yl4.24 Types of Application of Engineering Drawings 2012

3.4 ASME Y14.34M Associated Lists 2013

3.5 ASME Y14.5M Dimensioning and Tolerancing Standard 2017

3.6 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

3.7 ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001-2008: Quality Management Systems -

Requirements

3.8 MIL-STD-1309D Definitions of Terms for Testing, Measurement and Diagnostics

12 February

3.9 MIL-STD-2073-1D Standard Practice for Military Packaging 23 May

3.10 MIL-HDBK-831, Notice 1 Preparation of Test Reports 23 April

3.11 T9074-AQ-GIB-010/248 Requirements for Welding and Brazing Procedure and Performance Qualification

1 August

3.12 S9074-AR-GIB-010A/278 Requirements for Fabrication Welding and Inspection, and Casting Inspection and Repair for Machinery, piping, and Pressure Vessels

14 February

3.13 MIL-STD-31000 Technical Data Packages 26 February

3.14 Technical Data Packages (Level II or Level III Drawings) TBD at BPA Call Level

4.0 Technical Requirements

4.1 Hardware Fabrication (CLIN 0001)

In accordance with the Applicable Documents in Section 3.0 and using GFI in Section 6.0, the contractor shall fabricate, test, package, and deliver hardware as specified in the BPA call. Along with the delivery of the manufactured units, the contractor shall deliver a Certificate of Compliance, which shall include source material, in-process test data recorded, and all inspection data recorded by the contractor. The contractor shall perform Quality Assurance (QA) testing in accordance with the contractor’s standard QA procedures current at the time of testing to demonstrate that the manufactured units conform to the requirements of the TDP.

Deliverables:

The Contractor shall deliver build-to-print hardware. Each delivery shall include a Department of Defense (DD) Form 250.

A001: CDRL A001 Certificate of Compliance (COC)

A002: Quality Assurance Test Report

5.0 Progress Reports

RESERVED

6.0 Government Furnished Information

The Government will make available GFI as it applies to the requirements set forth in the BPA calls.

7.0 Government Furnished Property

The Government may provide Government Furnished Property (GFP) as it applies to the requirements set forth in the BPA calls. The contractor shall adhere to DFARS Clause 252.245– 7005 for the management and reporting of Government Property and shall use the GFP Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) as specified in the clause. In addition, the Contractor shall prepare and submit a Government Property (GP) Inventory Report to capture GFP status IAW CDRL A003.

Deliverable: CDRL A003

8.0 Quality Surveillance and Performance Standards

The Government will conduct quality surveillance via various methods including formal and informal meetings and review of deliverables. Contractor performance will be evaluated in the areas of technical quality, responsiveness, schedule/timeliness, cost, and regulatory compliance.

9.0 Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Accessibility Requirements

The Government has determined that this procurement is [not Information and Communication Technology (ICT).

10.0 Security Compliance

10.1 Program Protection

SECURITY: All Contractor personnel shall adhere to the Security provisions of 32 CFR Part 117

– National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM). While performing work at a Government Facility, Contractor personnel shall comply with the security regulations of the host facility. Applicable FAR, DFARS, NMCARS clauses, and NAVSEA text shall be adhered to in the performance of this contract. Security incidents shall be promptly reported through the companies Facility Security Officer (FSO), to the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), Technical Point of Contact (TPOC), and the Cognizant Security Office to NUWCDIVNPT Security.

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) including Legacy FOUO and Covered Defense Information (meeting the definition of 48 CFR 252.204–7012(a)) generated and/or provided under this contract shall be marked and safeguarded as specified in DoD Instruction 5200.48, CUI available at:

https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/520048p.PDF. Any product containing Covered Defense Information shall be assigned a distribution statement (distribution statements B through F) in accordance with DoDI 5230.24 (Distribution Statements on Technical Documents); and DoDI 5230.24, Enclosure 3 Procedures, available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/523024p.pdf

INFORMATION SECURITY: If the work is performed at the Contractor's facility, the Contractor shall implement and maintain security procedures and controls to prevent unauthorized disclosure of classified information and controlled unclassified information (CUI) and to control distribution of CUI in accordance with National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) codifying 32 CFR Part 117, NISPOM Rule, and SECNAV M-

5510.36B. If the work is performed at the Government's facility, the Contractor shall comply with facility policy.

CUI INCIDENT REPORTING AND RESPONSE: The Contractor shall promptly report any unauthorized, inadvertent, or illegal release or disclosure of CUI to the Contracting Officer’s Representative / Technical Point of Contact (TPOC), Procuring Contracting Officer, and the Security Office. Contractor personnel shall coordinate this effort through the relevant industry site FSO.

PUBLIC RELEASE: Any controlled unclassified information pertaining to this contract shall not be released for public dissemination, including posting to any social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter, unless it has been approved for public release by appropriate U.S.

Government authority. Proposed public releases shall be submitted for approval prior to release through the appropriate U.S. Government Office.

10.2 Operations Security (OPSEC)

OPSEC is a process that identifies critical information to determine if friendly actions can be observed by adversary intelligence systems, determines if information obtained by adversaries could be interpreted to be useful to them, and then executes selected measures that eliminate or reduce adversary exploitation of friendly critical information.

The Contractor shall develop and implement, and update and maintain an OPSEC program to protect controlled unclassified and classified activities, information, equipment, and material used or developed by the Contractor and any subcontractor during performance of the contract.

The Contractor shall be responsible for the subcontractor implementation of the OPSEC requirements. The Contractor developed OPSEC program may include Information Assurance and Communications Security (COMSEC). The OPSEC program shall be in accordance with National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM) 28, and at a minimum shall include:

1) Assignment of responsibility for OPSEC direction and implementation.

2) Issuance of procedures and planning guidance for the use of OPSEC techniques to identify vulnerabilities and apply applicable countermeasures.

3) Establishment of OPSEC education and awareness training. To include initial and annual OPSEC training.

4) Provisions for management, annual review, and evaluation of OPSEC programs.

5) Flow down of OPSEC requirements to subcontractors when applicable.

While performing aboard Government sites, the contractor shall: comply with all OPSEC instructions and policies; include OPSEC as part of its ongoing security awareness program and take all required Agency training; Be responsive to the Supporting OPSEC Manager on a non-interference basis; and Protect sensitive unclassified information and activities, which could compromise classified information or operations, or degrade the planning and execution of operations performed by the Requiring Organization and contractor in support of the mission.

10.3 Electronic Spillage

Electronic Spillage (ES) is defined as a situation where information of higher classification than a system is authorized to process is introduced into that system, intentionally or otherwise. If a Contractor is determined to be responsible for an ES, all direct and indirect costs incurred by the Government for ES remediation will be charged to the Contractor.