DRAFT Attachment 4- Past Performance Relevancy Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MARCENT OAMS Follow-On
- Solicitation number
- M00264-25-R-0001
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
The file is a Draft Attachment 4 Past Performance Relevancy Matrix for the MARCENT OAMS Follow-On contract (Solicitation M00264-25-R-0001). The matrix is a comprehensive template for contractors to document and evaluate past performance records, designed to demonstrate relevant experience for a Marine Corps professional services contract. The matrix requires detailed information for up to six past performance records, including contract scope, complexity, magnitude, point of contact, agency, NAICS code, performance period, and specific task alignment with the MARCENT 2.0 requirement.
The matrix includes a rating system for past performance relevancy, ranging from "Very Relevant" (essentially same scope and complexity) to "Not Relevant" (little to no similarity). Contractors must provide specifics such as contract type, deliverables, number of full-time employees, annual value, total contract value, and compliance with FAR 52.219-8 (small business utilization). The contract supports United States Marine Corps Forces Central Command (MARCENT) with professional services across multiple domains including command element, intelligence, operations, logistics, planning, communications, strategy development, operational policy reviews, crisis action planning, and wargaming exercise support both within the continental United States (CONUS) and outside the continental United States (OCONUS).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 3- Initial and Sample Task Order Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 6- Pricing Template -Insert Offeror Name.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| M00264-25-R-0001 MARCENT OAMS 2.0 RFP.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2- Staffing Matrix Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4- Past Performance Relevancy Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 5- PPQ M00264-25-R-0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 1 Draft DD 254.pdf | ||
| Draft RFP 5-21-25.docx | DOCX document | |
| M0026425R0001PPQ (Attachment 5).docx | DOCX document | |
| DRAFT Attachment 2- Staffing Matrix Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT Attachment 3 Initial and Sample Task Order Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT Attachment 6- Pricing Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Past Performance Matrix | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| General Information | Recency | Relevancy | Quality | Compliance with the requirement of FAR Part 52.219-8 (Utilization of Small Business Concerns | |||||||||||||||||||
| Scope | Complexity | Magnitude | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Contract Record (Max to 6 records) | Past Performance Record Number | Past Performance Record Name | Name of company (prime) to whom the contract record was awarded to | Point of Contact of the record (e.g. COR) | Agency who issued the record (Agency/Command name)? | NAICS used in the Past Performance Record | Signed Prime and Subcontractor commitment included in your Proposal. | Start and End date of the record (Period of Performance) within the past four years (from solicitation date). This includes a record whom expiration date falls within 4 years from solicitation issuance date. In order for a past performance reference to be considered, the offeror (or it's affiliate) shall have performed for at least 6 months under the referenced contract, but no older than 4 years from RFP due date. | Scope of Past Performance Record per contract record PWS/SOW/SOO What is this record for as stated in the scope section of the past performance record PWS/SOW/SOO? | Solicitation Requirement Task/sub-task Claimed Experience What experience (domains) of this record relates to the MARCENT 2.0 requirement? Please identify which section(s) of the MARCENT OAMS PWS does this past performance record relates. | Past Performance Contract Record direct language for claimed experience. Please tag/map those specific written passages in the SOW/PWS that support a relevance determination for each of the proposed domain(s). | Type of Contract of the Past Performance Record (FFP, CPAF, CPFF, etc) | Was this record procured as non-commercial service? | Did you perform as prime or subcontractor under this past performance record? | Did you manage subcontracts under this past performance record? If so, how many? What is the total value of subcontracts managed? | Does this record require a DD-254 at the Top Secret level? | Type of deliverables executed (e.g., class execution, reports, curriculums, studies, etc.) | Number of FTEs used on this past performance record as related to the claimed experience. | Annual value of the past performance record's claimed experience. Please provide how much is the annual value of the past performance record work claimed as related experience for MARCENT OAMS 2.0 | Total Value of the Past Performance Record | Please provide the Quality Technical rating granted in CPARS? If there is no CPARS, please use the Past Performance Questionnaire. | Confirm that a copy of CPARS/ Past Performance Questionnaire of the respective record is included in your proposal. | Please demonstrate how compliance with FAR 52.219-8 was achieved for each past performance record included in your proposal. |
DRAFT
DRAFT
Sheet2
| Table 4. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings | |
| Rating | Definition |
| Very Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Somewhat Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. |
| Not Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .