DRAFT ATCH 6 Past Performance Questionnaire Form.pdf
PDF 93 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Treasury Food Services Vault Cafe Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 2032H321R00012
About this file
This draft request for proposal is for food services in the Vault Cafe within the Department of the Treasury's Office of Management. The government intends to award one contract to provide food services, which may include operating a cafe, catering events, and providing vending services. Interested offerors are encouraged to submit any questions on the draft RFP by February 25, 2021. The government anticipates releasing the final RFP within 30 days and selecting an awardee thereafter. The solicitation includes attachments such as past performance evaluation criteria, sample profit and loss statements, and equipment lists to aid offerors in preparing proposals for this opportunity.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| DRAFT ATCH 4 Patronage and Sales Report Form.pdf | ||
| DRAFT ATCH 5 TEP WorkSheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT RFP 2032H321R00012 20210211.pdf | ||
| DRAFT ATCH 2 GFE.pdf | ||
| DRAFT ATCH 6 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| DRAFT ATCH 1 Profit and Loss Stmt Form.pdf | ||
| DRAFT ATCH 3 QCP Inspection Form.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT ATCH 6 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Name of Company being evaluated
Name of Entity/Agency/Firm for which Company being evaluated provided service
Questionnaire Respondent Name and Title
Questionnaire Completion Date
Period of Performance for which this evaluation covers
Detailed Description of Requirement
EVALUATION – Instructions to questionnaire respondent There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: recency, relevancy (including context of data), and quality (including general trends in contractor performance and source of information). Below are listed specific questions relating to the contractor performance. There is a comment section provided below each question.
A. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
1. To what extent did the contractor comply with the specific contract requirements?
Comment:
2. To what extent did the contractor provide quality products?
3. To what extent did the contractor provide quality customer service?
4. To what extent did the contractor control costs? Were there any requests for equitable adjustments or claims? If so, provide a brief summary explanation.
B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
1. To what extent did the contractor adhere to contract or performance schedules?
2. To what extent did the contractor adhere to contract delivery of monthly reports?
3. Responsiveness and capability to respond to urgent/short term requirements.
C. BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. To what extent was the contractor able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from Government counterparts (COR)?
2. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with Government staff?
D. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
1. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for cause, default or convenience?
[ ] Yes for: [ ] Default [ ] Convenience [ ] Cause [ ] No
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
2. Are there any pending terminations?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
If yes, please explain and indicate the status.
3. Would you recommend this contractor for the award of additional contracts?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
E. OVERALL PERFORMANCE
How would you rate the vendor’s overall performance?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .