Dome Visual System - Past Performance Survey 2024.2.23.docx
DOCX document 42 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Dome Visual System
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-24-R-00068
About this file
This document includes a past performance survey for a contractor and a solicitation for a Dome Visual System. The solicitation seeks a configuration, delivery, installation, setup, testing, and support for a Dome Visual System to support flight simulators for the Federal Aviation Administration located at the FAA Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Interested parties must be registered in SAM.gov and respond with any questions by March 18, 2024 to allow adequate time for response prior to proposals being due on March 25, 2024 at 2:30 PM Central Time to Nia Glover at nia.glover@faa.gov. The past performance survey collects information and ratings on quality, timeliness, cost control, program management, and customer relationship for an unnamed contractor to support an evaluation. The Federal Aviation Administration is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Dome Visual System - SOW revised 28 March 2024.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6973GH-24-R-00068 Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| QA 3-20-2024.pdf | ||
| Dome Visual System - SOW 2024.01.30.pdf | ||
| Dome Visual System - Past Experience Information 2024.2.23.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6973GH-24-R-00068.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE EVALUATION PLAN (LPTA)
DOME VISUAL SYSTEM
Announcement #:
ATTACHMENT 3
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
PART I (TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR REQUESTING THE REFERENCE)
A. OFFEROR INFORMATION
Offeror Name:
Offeror Address:
B. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Project Title:
Contract Number:
Agency/Customer:
Agency/Customer POC Name:
Agency/Customer POC Email Address
Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other:
Contract Type:
Contract Purpose (e.g., Service, Supply, Development/First Article, R&D)?
Contract Award Date:
Period of Performance
Total Contract Value:
Value of Offeror’s Share
Was the Offeror a Prime Contractor?
Yes
No
Was the Offeror a Sub Contractor?
Yes
No
Competitive Award?
Yes
No
Program Title and nature of the effort (i.e., describe the scope of the effort, the type of tasks involved, labor skills used, and products/support delivered).
PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDENT)
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating that is based on objective measurable performance indicators to the maximum extent possible. Commentary to support very high or very low rating should be noted on page 5.
Assign each area a rating of, 4 (Outstanding), 3 (Good), 2 (Satisfactory), and 1 (Unsatisfactory). Use the attached Rating Guidelines which is provided as Exhibit 1 as guidance in making these evaluations. Circle the appropriate rating.
A. IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONDENT
Name:
Title:
Telephone Number:
Address:
Email:
B. EVALUATION
QUALITY OF SERVICE:
| # |
| Category |
| Rating |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| Compliance with contract requirements |
| 2 |
| Accuracy of reports |
| 3 |
| Level of knowledge, experience, and training of personnel |
| 4 |
| Capability of personnel to perform required services |
| 5 |
| Effectiveness of personnel in performing required services |
| 6 |
| Overall quality of service |
TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
| # |
| Category |
| Rating |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| Reliability |
| 2 |
| Responsive to technical direction |
| 3 |
| Meets contract delivery schedules and/or task deadlines |
COST CONTROL:
| # |
| Category |
| Rating |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| Current, accurate and complete billings |
| 2 |
| Relationship of negotiated costs to actuals |
| 3 |
| Cost effectiveness |
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT:
| # |
| Category |
| Rating |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| Adequate and complete management plan |
| 2 |
| Specific management team dedicated to this project |
| 3 |
| Indications that the provided team had experience in subcontractor management and surveillance |
| 4 |
| Process, or metrics, for the evaluation of their own overall management performance |
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP:
| # |
| Category |
| Rating |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| Effective management, including subcontracts |
| 2 |
| Reasonable/cooperative behavior |
| 3 |
| Responsive to contract requirements |
| 4 |
| Notification of problems |
| 5 |
| Flexibility |
| 6 |
| Proactive vs. reactive |
OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
| # |
| Category |
| Response |
| Yes |
| No |
| 1 |
| The contractor is committed to customer satisfaction: |
a. Contractor Management Personnel
b. Contractor Onsite Facility Personnel
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Rating Guidelines Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.
| RATING |
| QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE |
| COST CONTROL |
| TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE |
| BUSINESS RELATIONS |
| 4-Outstanding |
| Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and/or delivers quality products/services |
| Contractor is effective in managing costs and submits current, accurate, and complete billings |
| Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/ |
administrative issues is effective
| 3-Good |
| Minor inefficiencies/errors have been identified |
| Contractor is usually effective in managing costs |
| Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is usually effective |
| 2-Satisfactory |
| Some problems have been encountered |
| Contractor is having some problems in managing costs effectively |
| Contractor is having some problems meeting milestones and delivery schedules |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is somewhat effective |
| 1-Unsatisfactory |
| Contractor is not in compliance and is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives |
| Contractor is unable to manage costs effectively |
| Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives |
| Response to inquiries, technical/service/administrative issues is not effective |
Past Performance Survey | 14
Source Selection Sensitive “This document may contain information considered sensitive unclassified information (SUI) and would merit protection from unauthorized disclosure under 5 U.S.C, Section 552(b)(4). No information shall be released except as authorized by the Contracting Officer.”
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .