revised_ATTACHMENT_J-7_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Operation of Red Rock Job Corps Center
- Solicitation number
- DOL-ETA-15-R-00010
About this file
revised PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Red_Rock_Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| DOL-ETA-15-R-00010_Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| Red_Rock_JCC_CTS_RFP.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION NUMBER: DOL-ETA-15-R-00010 Red Rock JCC/CTS – Dec 2014
ATTACHMENT J-7 (page 1 of 5)
Past Performance Questionnaire
To Whom it May Concern:
The _______________ Company is currently responding to the U. S. Department of Labor RFP #DOL-ETA-15-R-00010 for the procurement of the continued operation of the Red Rock Job Corps Center.
The U. S. Department of Labor is placing increased emphasis in their procurements on past performance as a source selection factor. They are requiring that clients of entities responding to their solicitations be identified and their participation in the evaluation process be requested. Therefore, we are requesting that you provide the following information regarding our performance on the contract identified below. Please complete Sections B-F of this Questionnaire and return it directly to the address shown below no later than 12:00 p.m. EST, February 9, 2015.
ATTN: Ms. Dayle White Office of Contracts Management (OCM)
U.S. DOL – ETA
200 Constitution Avenue, NW N-4643 Washington DC 20210 white.dayle@dol.gov
By my signature below, I authorize you to respond to any additional inquiries by the U. S. Department of Labor regarding our performance on the referenced contract.
(Signature) (Date)
(Title)
A. Past Performance
A. Contract Identifying Information:
Offeror:
Project Title & Contract Number:
Contracting Officer:
Phone No.
| Project Manager: |
| Phone No. |
Address:
FAX No.
Work Performance Period: _____________________ to ______________________
Contract Value: $
Brief Summary of Statement of Work:
ATTACHMENT J-7 (page 2 of 5) B. Outcomes vs. Goals:
1. Were there measurable performance goals or outcomes associated with this contract? If yes, describe:
Yes No
For the following questions, where applicable, check the adjectival rating which most closely represents your assessment of the contractor's performance: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory
| 2. | How effective was the contractor in achieving those outcomes? (Explain any rating below Satisfactory) |
| Exceptional |
Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
C. Cost Control: How well has the contractor:
| 1. | Performed all contracted services within the budget? |
| Exceptional |
Very Good Satisfactory
| 2. | Submitted complete and accurate financial reports and invoices? |
| Exceptional |
Very Good Satisfactory
3. Has a draft or final audit report disclosed questioned or disallowed costs? If yes, indicate:
period covered by audit disallowed or recommended for disallowance disallowed costs as a % of audited funds Yes No
Comments: (Explain any ratings below Satisfactory)
Summary Adjectival Rating of Cost Control Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory
ATTACHMENT J-7 (page 4 of 5) D. Timeliness of Performance: How well has the contractor:
| 1. | Completed contract requirements and submitted reports and schedules according to specified time frames? | |
| Exceptional | Marginal | |
| Very Good | Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory
| 2. | Responded to technical direction and requests in a timely manner? | |
| Exceptional | Marginal | |
| Very Good | Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory
Comments: (Explain any ratings below Satisfactory)
| Summary Adjectival Rating of Timeliness of Performance | |
| Exceptional | Marginal |
| Very Good | Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory
E. Business Relations: To what extent has the contractor:
| 1. | Been pro-active in contract monitoring and review? | |
| Exceptional | Marginal | |
| Very Good | Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory
| 2. | Demonstrated a responsive and cooperative working relationship with the Contracting Officer and Project staff? | |
| Exceptional | Marginal | |
| Very Good | Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory
| 3. | Promptly notified the Contracting Officer of potential problems? | |
| Exceptional | Marginal | |
| Very Good | Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory
| 4. | Used effective approaches and provided technical expertise and resources to solve contract problems? | |
| Exceptional | Marginal | |
| Very Good | Unsatisfactory |
Comments: (Explain any ratings below Satisfactory)
Summary Adjectival Rating of Business Relations
| Exceptional | Marginal |
| Very Good | Unsatisfactory |
ATTACHMENT J-7 (page 5 of 5) F. Customer Satisfaction: To what extent has the contractor:
1. Been effective in tailoring the program to meet the needs of the customers?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
2. Shown flexibility in operating the program to meet changing program needs and emphases?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal
Comments: (Explain any ratings below Satisfactory)
Summary Adjectival Rating of Customer Satisfaction
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal
Additional Comments:
Name & Title of Individual Completing Information:
Phone No.
(For Department of Labor Use Only)
SUMMARY PAST EXPERIENCE CONFIRMATION
B. Outcomes vs. Goals
C. Cost Control
D. Timeliness of Performance
E. Business Relations
F. Customer Satisfaction
Verified by:___________________________________________Date:____________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .