OFLC IT SOLICITATION AMEND 1.DOC

5. PROJECT NO.

CODE

7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED

BPA NO.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE

CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR AC- KNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 10-83)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office.

is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

BY

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 (Type or print) (Type or print) (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (If other than Item 6) (Specify type of modification and authority) (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required) (If applicable)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X) (X)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer) 1 7

02-JUL-2009

615-091A-3 OASAM Office of Procurement Services U. S. Department of Labor

RM S4307

200 Constitution Ave., NW Washington DC 20210 OASAM Office of Procurement Services U. S. Department of Labor

RM S4307

200 Constitution Ave., NW Washington DC 20210 To all Offerors/Bidders

DOL099RP20703

06-29-2009 X X X

THE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT IS TO:

1. INCORPORATE THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE WHICH WAS INADVERTENTLY OMITTED FROM THE SOLICITATION.

2. UPDATE SECTION 1.10.2 OF THE STATEMENT OF WORK (SEE CONTINUATION PAGE).

3. NOTIFY PROSPECTIVE 8(a) CONTRACTORS THAT RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS WILL BE POSTED TO FEDBIZOPS BY AMENDMENT ON A WEEKLY BASIS STARTING FRIDAY 3-JUL-2009. LAST DAY FOR POSTED RESPONSES WILL BE 21-JUL-2009.

WILLIAM F. MOSES

CONTRACTING OFFICER

CONTINUATION PAGE

ATTACHMENT: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in, this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Offerror: Complete SECTION 1, then e-mail questionnaire to the customer points of contact listed on the Past Performance Information Sheet for the contract identified.

Offerror’s Evaluator: Complete SECTIONS 2-5 and e-mail to: lasondia.chaney@bolling.af.mil and william.moses@bolling.af.mil" william.moses@bolling.af.mil

(DO NOT PROVIDE COPY BACK TO THE OFFEROR)

SECTION 1: CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor

B. Prime Contractor Cage Code

C. Contract Number

D. Contract Type

E. Was this a competitive contract?

Yes

No

F. Period of Performance

G. Initial Contract Cost ($)

H. Current/Final Contract Cost ($)

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs (enter below):

J. Description of service provided (enter below):

NOTE: Cross-reference with RFP Attachment L-001 and RFP Attachment L-002

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency Name

B. Customer or Agency Description (if applicable)

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Command

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's Name

B. Evaluator's Title

C. Evaluator's Phone/Fax Number

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please confirm that your evaluation is consistent with the description of service provided in paragraph J, Section 1.

Indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

E EXCEPTIONAL (BLUE) – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD (PURPLE) – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY (GREEN) – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was satisfactory.

M MARGINAL (YELLOW) – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY (RED) – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a score.

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

E V S M U N How would you rate the quality of the management support assigned by the contractor to the project?

How effective was the on-site management?

How would you rate the quality of the service provided?

How would you rate the accuracy of deliverables (reports, etc.)?

How would you rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer inquiries?

How would you rate the ability of the contractor to meet established milestones?

How would you rate the contractor’s communication with the customer?

How would you rate the contractor’s ability to work automated systems?

How would you rate the contractor’s ability to suggest innovative remedies?

How would you rate the overall performance by the contractor?

RESOURCES

E V S M U N How would you rate the quality of the contractor’s personnel assigned to the project?

How would you rate the quality of the contractor’s corporate backup for the employees at your site?

How would you rate the contractor’s employees at developing innovative and alternative methods of performing required functions on your project?

How would you rate the contractor’s cooperativeness in reacting to changes?

How would you rate the contractor’s ability to meet suspense dates and milestones?

How would you rate the contractor’s ability to deal with changes and deficiencies?

How successful was the contractor in successfully completing the project (i.e. Were there any show cause or cure notices issued? Was the contractor defaulted on the action or any other contracting action of which are you aware?)

Please discuss each response for which you indicated Exceptional (Blue), Marginal (Yellow) or Unsatisfactory (Red) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

Displayed initiative to solve problems.

No

Default

Convenience

Pending Terminations

If yes, please explain below (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please e-mail this form to:

Llewellyn.Lesa@dol.gov

RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to Llewellyn.Lesa@dol.gov by 20 July 2009, 12:00PM EST.

Section 1.10.2 of the statement of work has been updated from:

1.10.2 Background Checks/Security: Contractor shall hold, at a minimum, an interim secret facility clearance prior to the RFP closing date. All contractor personnel that require regular access to DOL must submit to the Department’s process for obtaining a Personal Identity Verification (PIV) card. The PIV process includes a background investigation as required by the Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12) Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors,” which the President issued on August 27, 2004.

To the following:

1.10.2 Background Checks/Security: All individuals provided by the contractor shall be a U.S. residents or citizens and must undergo a background investigation. Contractor shall hold, at a minimum, an interim secret facility clearance prior to the RFP closing date. All contractor personnel that require regular access to DOL must submit to the Department’s process for obtaining a Personal Identity Verification (PIV) card. The PIV process includes a background investigation as required by the Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (HSPD-12) Policy for a Common Identification Standard for Federal Employees and Contractors,” which the President issued on August 27, 2004, the DOL the Personnel Suitability and Security Handbook, September 2004, the DOL Policy for PIV Card Issuance to New Federal Employees and Contractors, December 2005, and the Federal Information Processing Standards 201.