Attachment 1(H) Past Performance Survey Ratings Guidelines.pdf

PDF 11 KB Posted

Attached to
COURT SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES
Solicitation number
DJM-13-A32-R-0003
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 1(H) DJM-13-A32-R-0003

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_A0004.zip ZIP file
DJM-13-A32-R-0003_A0003.pdf PDF
DJM-13-A32-R-0003_A0002.pdf PDF
Section_K_(revised)_FAR_52.204-8__Annual_Representations_and_Certifications_(DEC_2012).pdf PDF
09_NCA_SPFPA_CBA_FY2013_(new).pdf PDF
J1(C)-Revised_Price_Summary_Sheets_(3_circuits).zip ZIP file
DJM-13-A32-R-0003_Questions_ _Responses.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DJM-13-A32-R-0003_A0001.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 —
Attachment 2(A) - CSO Form 001.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(C) 9th Circuit - Price Summary Sheets.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment 2(I) - CSO Form 014.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(G) Past Performance Survey.pdf PDF
9th_Circuit_CBA_(1_of_3).zip ZIP file
Attachment 4(A) - USMS Directive Use of Force.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(I) Past Performance Reference Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment 4(C) - CSO Body Armor Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(B) 9th Circuit - Seniority List.pdf PDF
Attachment 3(F) - Standard Form 1035 Continuation Sheet SAMPLE.pdf PDF
SOLICITATION DJM-13-A32-R-0003.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(E) Table for Start Up Costs.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 7(A) CSO Semi-Auto Handgun Qualification Course.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(J) - FD-258.pdf PDF
Attachment 3(A) - CSO Form 002.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(H) - CSO Form 229.pdf PDF
9th_Circuit_CBA_(2_of_3).zip ZIP file
Attachment 3(C) - CSO Form 010.pdf PDF
Attachment 3(E) - Standard Form 1034 SAMPLE.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(B) 2nd Circuit - Seniority List.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(B) - CSO Form 004.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 —
Attachment 4(B) - USMS Directive Less-Than-Lethal Devices.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(F) Table for Body Armor Kits.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2(L) - DOJ-555.pdf PDF
Attachment 6- List of Government Acronyms.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(K) - CSO Form 012.pdf PDF
2nd_Circuit_CBA_(1_of_3).zip ZIP file
Attachment 2(F) - CSO Form 008.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(C) - CSO Form 005.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(B) 10th Circuit - Seniority List.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 Interagency Acquisition Agreements.pdf PDF
2nd_Circuit_CBA_(2_of_3).zip ZIP file
Attachment 2(G) - CSO Form 009.pdf PDF
9th_Circuit_CBA_(3_of_3).zip ZIP file
Attachment 3(B) - CSO Form 003.pdf PDF
Attachment 1(J) CPARS Update Questionnaire.pdf PDF
10th_Circuit_CBA.zip ZIP file
2nd_Circuit_CBA_(3_of_3).zip ZIP file
Attachment 7(B) Section J Annual Training.pdf PDF
Attachment 2(D) - CSO Form 006.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 56 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DJM-13-A32-R-0003

PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY RATING GUIDELINES

Attachment 1( H)

Summarize contractor performance in each of the survey rating areas. Assign each area a rating of either: 0 (Unsatisfactory), 1 (Marginal), 2 (Satisfactory), 3 (Very Good), or 4 (Exceptional). Use the following rating descriptions as guidance in making these evaluations.

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effect.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effect.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the evaluation areas being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the evaluation areas being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .