DCR 971_Wood Furnace_Stoves Sales_Service and Fuel Supply_Evaluation Criteria.docx

DOCX document 51 KB Posted

Attached to
DCR 971 Wood Furnace, Stoves Sales, Service and Fuel Supply
Solicitation number
BD-26-1020-DCRCU-DC250-122530
Issued by
Suffolk County, Boston City, Massachusetts

About this file

This is an evaluation criteria document for a Wood Furnace, Stoves Sales, Service, and Fuel Supply procurement issued by the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) under COMMBUYS Bid #BD-26-1020-DCRCU-DC250-122530 (Agency Document Number: DCR 971). The procurement seeks vendors to provide sales, service, and fuel supply for wood furnaces and stoves to support agency facilities. Respondents must meet mandatory requirements to advance in the evaluation process, including a minimum of three years of experience performing similar related services and demonstrated positive customer relationships verified through business references. Vendors are required to submit the Bidder Response Form with all required attachments and pricing information as specified in the bid documents.

The evaluation will consider multiple pricing components including volume purchase discounts, dock delivery discounts, prompt pay discounts, standard and emergency service call charges, installation costs, parts mark-up from wholesale, and fuel costs. Additional evaluation criteria encompass service capability with response times meeting agency needs, years in business experience, manufacturer certifications, service territory coverage, product quality standards compliance, and contractor capability to meet facility needs. The procurement team reserves discretion to determine whether non-compliance with mandatory specifications is insignificant or easily correctable, and may consider alternatives that provide equivalent, better, or more cost-effective performance than stated specifications. Price will carry significant weight in the overall evaluation process.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Evaluation Criteria Document Title: Wood Furnace_Stoves Sales_Service and Fuel Supply Agency Document Number: DCR 971

COMMBUYS BID #: BD-26-1020-DCRCU-DC250-122530

Evaluation criteria The procurement team will evaluate each response and determine which Respondents meet the standards of the agency. Those vendors will then proceed to subsequent stages of the evaluation and/or enter into negotiations with the Commonwealth to receive a Contract award.

1.1 Mandatory requirements

Mandatory Specifications must be met for a Bid to be evaluated and may be used to disqualify Bidders. In addition, certain mandatory specifications have desirable components that may be evaluated by the SSST. The SSST reserves the right, in its discretion, to determine if non-compliance with a Mandatory Specification is insignificant or may be easily corrected.

Bid sections that include terms such as: “must,” “shall,” “will,” and “required” are mandatory. Failure to meet the requirements of a mandatory specification without providing an alternate that is acceptable to the evaluators may result in the disqualification of a Bidder's proposal.

· Responding vendors are required to provide evidence that they meet the minimum qualifications cited above, i.e. at least 3 years performing similar related services and a positive working relationship with customers as evidenced in a review of the Business Reference by the procurement team.

· Vendors must also provide pricing information as requested above.

· Vendors must complete and submit the Bidder Response Form provided with the bid.

1.2 Alternatives

A Quote that fails to meet any material term or condition of the Bid, including the submission of required attachments, may lose points or be deemed unresponsive and disqualified. Unless otherwise specified, Bidders may submit Quotes proposing alternatives that provide equivalent, better, or more cost-effective performance than achievable under the stated Bid specifications. These alternatives may include related commodities or services that may be available to enhance performance during the period of the Contract. The Quote should describe how the alternative achieves substantially equivalent or better performance than those described in the Bid specifications.

The SSST will determine if a proposed alternative method of performance achieves substantially equivalent or better performance. The goal of this Bid is to provide the best value of commodities and/or services to achieve the goals of the procurement.

1.3 Evaluation Components

The following components will be some of the criteria considered by the SSST when evaluating each Quote.

Price Please note that price will carry significant weight in the evaluation process.

The following price components will be evaluated:

Volume purchase discounts Dock Delivery Discounts Prompt Pay Discounts (PPD) Service Call Charges – standard and emergency off-hours rates Installation Costs Parts mark-up from wholesale Fuel costs Service Capability Response times meet or exceed agency needs Experience Years in Business Review of customers on Business Reference Form Manufacturer certifications Service Territory Contractor meets need of agency facilities Product Quality Contractor meets or exceeds product standards image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .