08-Science_of_Autonomy_and_Swarming_Challenges.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- OFFensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET)
- Solicitation number
- DARPA-SN-17-02
About this file
ONR Slides
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ONR Science of Autonomy & Swarming Challenges
Marc Steinberg Program Officer, Science of Autonomy
Scalable Robust Collaboration- Key Research Themes
Scalable – simple individuals with minimal communications lead to versatile group Rigorous mathematical methods and tools for designing & predicting behaviors
Self-organizing structure/hierarchy appropriate to mission
Distribution A – Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited
Scalable/Distributed Collaboration
Engineered – Control Theory, Decentralized Optimization, Level sets, Topology, Graphs
Biological - Swarms, Flocks/Schools, Packs
Human – Game Theory, Crowds, Decentralized Organizations
Physics – Particle flow, Statistical mechanics, Force laws
Distribution A – Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited
Inspiration from Many Areas
Emergence of Leaders in Schools/Flocks/Swarms, Role of Heterogeneity
Group Hunting, Foraging, Defense by Mammals
Collective Transport
Coalition & Group Formation
Herding
Human Command & Control, Decentralized Interactions
Social Abilities in Primates, other Mammals
Need to move beyond point designs to a broad spectrum of capabilities
DoD Multi-Disciplinary Research Biology, Psychology, Oceanography, Engineering, Computer Science
-Homogenous systems -Simple behaviors -Decentralized control with local information
-Heterogeneous systems -Predator/prey relationships -Adapting Command and Control structure & hierarchy
-Robustness to dynamic environments -Time-critical problems -Human supervisory control
-Networks of humans and autonomous systems -Higher-level cognition
Participants: UPenn, USC, UC Berkeley, Georgia Tech, Stanford, CMU, MIT, ASU, Northwestern
Differing Human Interaction Roles
Operator Supervisor Customer Teammate
Swarms/DecentralizedMulti-VehicleIndividual Co-located
Typical Multi-Vehicle Supervisory Control Elements vs Swarms
Map (past, current, projected)
Timeline/Progress
Vehicle/Plan/Task Status
-Unreliable communications, State Info, projections -What info is important: Metric, topological, other visual cues?
-Individual vehicles may not know when tasks are completed -How to measure task progress in a swarm?
-Individual vehicles may no longer be important -Emergent behaviors/adaptation rather than stable central plans -Potential for human intervention to disrupt rather than help
Swarm CharacteristicsInterface Elements
Controlling Swarms- Mechanism
Group Heading Moments Formations
Area Distribution, Coverage, Diffusion
Control “Leaders”
Direct control of Macro Process Parameters
Spatial Control Beacons & “Pheromones”
Control “Predator”Herd Mediate
Mission Level Task & Forget
Open Issues
• Many “swarm” demonstrations have substantially simplified the problem
– Assume good communications, off‐board GPS/motion capture infrastructure
• What happens when you have to rely on on‐board sensing for self/swarm state?
– Either simple environments/mission tasks with larger numbers or more complex missions/environments with small numbers (<4‐20)
• Can we do both large numbers and complex missions/environments?
– We have shown we can do it once
• Is it robust, reliable, repeatable, usable, understandable?
• What is an appropriate level of interaction between humans and swarms?
– How impacted by communications/topology, swarm method, mission type, user type, etc.?
– What metaphors are most effective for humans?
– Is the human role to diagnose problems/assist the swarm (e.g., break it out of local minima), manage the swarm based on things it cannot sense/does not understand (e.g., complex tactical battlespace considerations), or just task and forget?
– How long do we trust a swarm to run on its own without intervention?
• How can controls, displays, and decision support be designed for swarm control?
– What are the most effective mechanisms for shaping/managing swarm behaviors?
– How can a human infer the intent and "situation awareness" of a swarm? How does a swarm infer the human’s intent?
– Are there any best times/modes for the operator to interact with the swarm and how can the human infer or be guided to them?
– Adversary response: how to detect when a swarm has been compromised?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .