Amend_No._005_Qs_and_As_.docx
DOCX document 37 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Foundation Cloud Hosting Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- D12PS00316
About this file
Q As
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_No._008.zip | ZIP file | |
| Amendment_No._007.zip | ZIP file | |
| Amendment_No._006.zip | ZIP file | |
| Amend_No._004_Signed_SF30.pdf | ||
| Amendment_No._005.zip | ZIP file | |
| Amendment_No._004.zip | ZIP file | |
| Amend_No._004_FINAL_SET_of_QsAs_thru_478_.doc | DOC document | |
| Amend No. 003 Signed SF30.pdf | ||
| Q As 1st set Pre-Prop Conf 8-2 thru 8-8-2012.doc | DOC document | |
| Amendment No. 003.zip | ZIP file | |
| Qs As 2nd set 8-8 thru 8-10-2012.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment No. 002.zip | ZIP file | |
| Amend No. 002 to D12PS00316.pdf | ||
| Amendment No. 001.pdf | ||
| Section J Attachments 1 through 45.zip | ZIP file | |
| RFP D12PS00316 - Sections B-M.zip | ZIP file |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation D12PS00316 Questions and Answers Amendment No. 005 Foundation Cloud Hosting Services
| Item |
| Page No. |
| Paragraph |
Ref/Sentence
| Question/Comment |
| Government Response |
| RFP Change |
| Attachment 1 Systems and Communications Protection |
| The organization partitions the information system into components residing in separate physical domains (or environments) as deemed necessary. |
Do all task orders require physical separation?
The government desires the most cost effective, best value proposed solution for each service of the technical service lines defined within the RFP.
Therefore, it is up to the offeror to propose their solutions which best meet the requirements and to articulate the value of their offering. This would include identifying any specific assumptions, concerns, constraints, and recommendations related to the security architecture and specific approaches to security controls.
DOI is not aware of public or hybrid cloud solutions at this time that would meet the security requirements defined in this solicitation, federal policy, and individual task orders for “MODERATE” systems, but may become aware of these through the solicitation process or otherwise in the future. DOI does not wish to preclude potential interagency customers from implementing hosting in public or hybrid cloud solutions based upon their independent risk management processes, or to preclude hosting of moderate systems in public or hybrid clouds if, and when, the specific security requirements defined in the RFP and the individual Task Orders can be met.
Therefore, it is up the offeror to provide sufficient information in their proposed submission in order to demonstrate performance in accordance with the security requirements as it would relate to any offering of services for hosting FISMA Low and Moderate systems No
| 37 |
| C-7 |
| C.3.7 |
| Does DOI have a strategy which defines when Private, Community, Public or Hybrid deployment will be utilized? |
Is it based on type of application or security level?
The DOI is not proposing a strategy for defining when various cloud deployment models will be used at this time, because such a strategy would be dependent upon the technologies and underlying the proposed and awarded solutions.
The government desires the most cost effective, best value proposed solution for each service of the technical service lines defined within the RFP.
Therefore, it is up to the offeror to propose their solutions which best meet the requirements and to articulate the value of their offering. This would include identifying any specific assumptions, concerns, constraints, proposals and recommendations related to the cloud deployment model (Private, Community, Public or Hybrid).
The security level requirements (FISMA Low or Moderate) are determined based upon the application and data hosted.
DOI is not aware of public or hybrid cloud solutions at this time that would meet the security requirements defined in this solicitation, federal policy, and individual task orders for “MODERATE” systems, but may become aware of these through the solicitation process or otherwise in the future. DOI does not wish to preclude potential interagency customers from implementing hosting in public or hybrid cloud solutions based upon their independent risk management processes, or to preclude hosting of moderate systems in public or hybrid clouds if, and when, the specific security requirements defined in the RFP and the individual Task Orders can be met.
Therefore, it is up the offeror to provide sufficient information in their proposed submission in order to demonstrate performance in accordance with the security requirements as it would relate to any offering of services for hosting FISMA Low and Moderate systems No
| 51 |
| C-34 |
| C.6.2.2.10 |
| Please clarify what is required with the Virtual Desktop requirement to allow “…The ability to install a wide range of applications on short notice without administrator intervention” with the traditional nature of VDI where application installations and releases are controlled to achieve consistency and minimize support requirements. |
| Section C.6.2.2.10, Table 7 has been changed to read: The ability for authorized government users to specify custom desktop images which include a wide range of applications, and deploy these images within timelines which may be identified in the individual task orders. |
| Yes, change made as stated in response. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .