D_Reference Check Form.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
010-25-22808 Audio Visual
Solicitation number
S-69100-00006022
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

The document is an Attachment F - Reference Check Form related to an RFP for "Services to Enhance Audio-Visual Effectiveness at Board Meetings and Other Public Events" issued by the state of Oregon. The RFP is for an independent contractor to provide audio-visual equipment and support services for board and public meetings around the state. The reference check form asks questions about the offeror's services, customer service, problem resolution, and project delivery.

The related state and local contract opportunity is for Audio Visual services in the state of Oregon, specifically in Marion County and the city of Salem. The state is seeking an independent contractor to transport and operate audio-visual equipment for board and public meetings. Further details on the scope of work and requirements are provided in the RFP documents.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]

ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Intermediate Procurement [REQ-69100-00035201 (010-25-22808)] - Services to Enhance Audio-Visual Effectiveness at Board Meetings and Other Public Events Att D

ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Offeror Name:__________________________________________
Reference Entity:__________________________________________
Reference Contact Name:__________________________________________
Contact Telephone Number:__________________________________________
Contact Email Address:__________________________________________

Please respond to the following questions:

1. For what type of services did you engage Offeror?

2. Describe the services listed in response to question 1.

3. Describe Offeror’s customer service.

4. Describe your satisfaction with the business relationship with Offeror.

5. Describe Offeror’s methods for problem resolution.

6. How likely would you be to use Offeror’s services again?

7. With which aspect(s) of Offeror’s services are you the most satisfied?

8. With which aspect(s) of Offeror’s services are you the least satisfied?

9. How well did Offeror stay within the proposed timeline?

10. How did the final project cost compare to the initial proposed cost?

Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014Page 1 of 2
DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 August 16, 2021Page 1 of 2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .