D.5 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 152 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Q522--Teleradiology Physician Services - VANEOHS
- Solicitation number
- 36C25025R0001
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) contract opportunity for Teleradiology Physician Services, Solicitation Number 36C25025R0001. The questionnaire is used to evaluate the past performance of a company being considered for award of the contract. It requests information from a previous/current purchaser of the company's services, including compliance with contract requirements, timeliness of reporting, ability to provide qualified personnel, meeting performance schedules, responsiveness, flexibility, and notification of problems. The questionnaire also asks whether the evaluator would award another contract to the company and if the customer was satisfied with the services provided. The contract opportunity is for the VA Veterans Integrated Service Network 10 to procure teleradiology physician services.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT D.5 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Reference RFP: 36C25024R0001 – Teleradiology Physician Services
INSTRUCTIONS: The Network Contracting Office (NCO) 10 is considering the Company (Offeror) listed below for award of a Department of Veterans Affairs Contract. You have been identified as a previous/current purchaser of the Company’s services, and your assistance with establishing the performance history for the Company is requested. Please note that your comments are considered source selection information and will not be shared in any way with the Company or any party outside the Department of Veterans Affairs.
This survey should be completed by an evaluator with sufficient knowledge of the Company’s performance and then sent directly to the Contract Specialist via email at Karen.Williams4@va.gov no later than the closing date and time of the solicitation. The Company (Offeror) should provide this information to you.
Information of the Company (Offeror) being evaluated:
Company Name: ________________________________________
Company Address: ________________________________________
Information of the Evaluator:
Evaluator Name and Title: _________________________________________
Company Name: _________________________________________
Phone Number: _________________________________________
Address: _________________________________________
Information of the Contract:
Contract Number: _________________________________________
Dollar Value: _________________________________________
Dates of Performance: _________________________________________
Brief Description of Work:______________________________________________________________ mailto:Karen.Williams4@va.gov
OVERALL RATING FOR THIS COMPANY IS:________________________________
Please provide supporting comments for each question below explaining the reasoning the particular rating was given.
“O” =Outstanding = Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements “A” =Above Average = Performance exceeded the contract requirements “S” = Satisfactory = Performance met the contract requirements “M” = Marginal = Performance met the minimum contract requirements, but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory “U” = Unacceptable = Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements Please rate and provide information and detailed comments for the following: Circle one
1. To what extent did the contractor comply with contract requirements? O A S M U
2. If reports were required, were they submitted timely per the contract requirements? O A S M U
3. To what extent did the contractor demonstrate ability to hire, maintain, or replace if necessary qualified key personnel during contract period?
O A S M U
4. To what extent was contractor able to meet the performance schedule? O A S M U
5. To what extent was the contractor responsive to technical directions? O A S M U
6. To what extent was contractor flexible in responding to changing needs? O A S M U
7. To what extent did contractor notify you of problems or potential problems? O A S M U
8. Have any cure notices, show cause letters, suspension of payment, or termination been issued? If yes, please explain
Yes No
9. Would you award another contract to the party being evaluated? If no, please explain: Yes No
10. Was the customer satisfied with the services provided? If no, please explain:
Yes No
Additional Comments:
Signature of Evaluator:_____________________________________________
Date:____________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .