D.5 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 33 KB Posted

Attached to
Q301--VISN 4 Lab Testing Services - (Finger Tip Glove / Equipment Testing) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24425Q0890
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 4

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Department of Veterans Affairs contract (Solicitation Number 36C24425Q0890) for VISN 4 USP 797/800 Lab Testing Services. The questionnaire is designed to evaluate a contractor's performance across multiple dimensions, including quality of services, timeliness of performance, and business relations, using an adjectival rating system ranging from Excellent to Unsatisfactory.

The questionnaire provides a structured template for an evaluator to assess a contractor's performance by completing sections on contractor identification, evaluator information, and detailed performance assessments. Key elements include narratives and ratings for quality of services, timeliness, and business relations, with space for identifying overall strengths and weaknesses. The document is intended to be completed and submitted to Cynthia Laemerhirt by email, with a solicitation close date of September 2, 2025, at 10:00 AM. The final section allows the evaluator to indicate whether they would award to the contractor again and provide an overall performance rating.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Q301--VISN 4 Lab Testing Services - (Finger Tip Glove / Equipment Testing), newest first.
File Type Posted
36C24425Q0890 0003.docx DOCX document
36C24425Q0890 0002.docx DOCX document
36C24425Q0890 0001.docx DOCX document
WD 2015-4239 Rev 30 Date 7-08-2025_ Luzerne County.pdf PDF
6500 Append D Rules of Behavior_2024.pdf PDF
D.6 VAAR 852.219-75 VA NOTICE OF LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING.docx DOCX document
36C24425Q0890.docx DOCX document
WD 2015-5791 Rev 29 Date 7-08-2025_ Chester County.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NUMBER – 36C24425Q0890

VISN4 USP 797/800 Lab Testing

THIS FORM IS TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EVALUATOR. PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING IDENTIFYING INFORMATION, PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT, PDF, SIGN, AND DATE. PLEASE SEND THE COMPLETED FORM TO CYNTHIA LAEMERHIRT, CYNTHIA.LAEMMERHIRT@VA.GOV. SOLICITATION CLOSE DATE IS 2 SEPT 2025 AT 10:00AM.:

I. CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION:

Contractor:

Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

Negotiated price or cost at award:

Current estimated contract dollar amount:

Describe service acquired:

II. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:

Name:

Organization:

Phone Number:

(i.e., Contracting Officer, Program Manager, Contract Specialist/Administrator, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative, other, etc.)

Time on Contract:

III. ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS: Narrative statements are vital. Please provide a narrative for each element below and then an adjectival rating under Paragraphs III.A2, III.B.2, III.C.2, and an overall Past/Present Performance adjectival rating under par. III.F based on the Adjectival Rating Descriptions below. Attach additional pages if there is insufficient space in the comment space.

PERFORMANCE ADJECTIVAL RATINGS: Choose the appropriate adjective that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance based on the descriptions below.

EXCELLENT
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements with most exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

A. QUALITY OF SERVICES

1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to provide qualified personnel (including experienced managers and/or supervisors), necessary equipment which is properly maintained, quality control for performance of your contract, and contractor’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.

2. Rating for Quality of Services: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

|_| Excellent |_|Good |_|Satisfactory |_|Marginal |_|Unsatisfactory

B. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
1. Narrative: Address the Contractor’s ability to meet the contract’sspecific response times and Contractor’s timeliness in providing anyadministrative reports/documents required by your contract.

2. Rating for Timeliness of Performance: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

C. BUSINESS RELATIONS

1. Narrative: Address Contractor’s willingness to improve and correct noncompliance issues and concerns. Describe Contractor’s ability to correct problems and prevent or mitigate potential problems in a timely manner. Does Contractor display initiative and flexibility? Do Contractor personnel promote a strong working relationship with your agency/organization? Are Contractor personnel courteous and responsive? Do Contractor personnel interface effectively with your staff?

2. Rating for Business Relations: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

D. Identify the contractor’s overall strengths and weaknesses:

E. Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again?

YES |_| NO |_|

If no, please explain:

F. CONTRACTOR’S OVERALL PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE RATING: (Please check one and provide a narrative explanation of a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating):

Additional Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Name/Signature Date

Title

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .