D.31 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 177 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Q201--Altus CBOC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C25923R0045
About this file
This past performance questionnaire is being used to evaluate a contractor's performance on a previous contract to inform an upcoming solicitation for primary care and mental health services at a Community Based Outpatient Clinic in Altus, Oklahoma. The reference contract involved the provision of healthcare providers, facilities, equipment, emergency pharmaceuticals, and administration to support enrolled patients. The questionnaire requests ratings and explanations for criteria including compliance with requirements, filling all needs, physician competence and responsiveness, flexibility in changes, and administrative support. It also asks if any cure notices or show cause letters were issued, and whether the evaluator would award another contract. The evaluator is asked to return the completed form to the contracting specialist supporting this acquisition for the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 19.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 47
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
D.31 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
36C25923R0045
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. The Contractor identified below has requested that you complete a past performance questionnaire on their behalf. This questionnaire will be used by the Contracting Officer to assess the likelihood that the
Offeror will perform successfully on an impending requirement for a Community Based Outpatient
Clinic in Altus, Oklahoma for the Oklahoma City VA Health Care System, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Your prompt completion and return of this questionnaire is greatly appreciated.
CONTRACTOR NAME
REFERENCED CONTRACT #
2. Background. The Oklahoma City VA Health Care System, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, has a need for the provision of Primary Care services and Mental Health support for eligible Veterans living in Altus
Oklahoma. The contractor shall furnish health care providers, medical facilities, equipment and supplies, emergency-fill pharmaceutical prescriptions, and administrative functions to fulfill the support of enrolled patients.
3. GENERAL INFORMATION: (Completed by Reference of Contractor being evaluated)
Name of Government or Commercial Organization:
Address:
Contract Number:
Brief Description:
Contractor Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor
Dates of Performance (if current include expiration):
Total Value of Contract:
Any terminations for cause or default? Circle YES or NO
If yes, brief explanation:
Any contract discrepancy reports filed? Circle YES or NO
If yes, brief explanation:
Point of Contact/Contracting Officer’s Representative:
Title:
Telephone Number:
Point of Contact’s email address:
4. Please answer the following questions pertaining to the relevancy of the services provided to you as compared to the description in paragraph 2.
Q1. Did the contractor provide Primary Care Services and Mental Health Services (Y/N)?
Q2. If no, please provide a short description of the type of services provided including the number of
FTE and /or number of patients served.
Q3. Did the contractor provide any additional services (Y/N)? If so, what types?
5. Please use the below matrix to answer questions relating to performance using the following template.
Please evaluate the past performance using only the following ratings without variation. If the rating is Excellent, Good, Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please provide additional information in the appropriate block or in the remarks section of this form.
“E” = Excellent = Performance greatly exceeded the contract requirements – High Confidence “G” = Good = Performance exceeded the contract requirements – High Confidence “S” = Satisfactory = Performance met the contract requirements - Confidence “M” = Marginal = Performance met the minimum contract requirements but some material aspects of the contractor’s performance were less than satisfactory - No Confidence “U” = Unsatisfactory = Performance was poor and/or did not satisfy contract requirements – No
Confidence
Please write in “not applicable” or “neutral” if unable to rate a certain question.
For any E, G, M, or U rating, please provide a short summary explanation of rating. – Unknown Confidence
Please rate and provide information/comments for the following: Circle one
Q1. To what extent did the contractor comply with overall contract requirements?
E G S M U
Q2. How successful was the Contractor in filling all requirements? E G S M U
Q3. How would you rate the quality of the Physicians provided by this Contractor in terms of technical competence, reliability, and demeanor with patients and staff.
E G S M U
Q4. To what extent was the Contractor able to meet unexpected and short notice changes and/or requirements (e.g. unexpected shift vacancies, training requirements).
E G S M U
Q5. How would you rate the Contractor’s administrative staff as pertains to communication with your organization’s key personnel, their ability to complete credentialing and privileging, billing and invoicing processes, and overall contract management?
E G S M U
Q6. Did you issue any cure notices, show cause letters, or suspension of payment? If yes, please explain.
Yes No
Q7. Would you award another contract to the Contractor being evaluated? If no, please explain:
Yes No
Q8. Additional Comments pertaining to contractor performance:
Printed Name & Signature of Evaluator
Date
4. Thank you for your time. Please return completed questionnaire to Patricia Toliver, Contracting Specialist for this acquisition, at patricia.toliver@va.gov .
mailto:patricia.toliver@va.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .