Combined Synopsis Solicitation - ACC A4SA Dronebuster Block 4 Requirement (CO Signed).pdf

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation for

ACC/A4SA Dronebuster Block 4 Requirement from

ACC AMIC/PKAB

Joint Base Langley-Eustis, VA 23665

24 June 2026

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for a commercial product prepared in accordance with (IAW) RFO Part 12. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation. Offers are being requested and a separate written solicitation will not be issued.

1. Solicitation number FA489026Q0013 is issued as a request for quotation (RFQ) to procure a handheld Counter-Small Unmanned Aircraft System (C-sUAS) defeat capability.

2. This acquisition is not set-aside for small business concerns. This solicitation incorporates provisions and clauses by reference. The full text of provisions and clauses may be accessed electronically at www.acquisition.gov.

3. This acquisition is for a Purchase Order (PO) to be issued under North American Industry

Classification System (NAICS) code 334511, Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing, with a size standard of 1,350.

This acquisition is being solicited as unrestricted under this NAICS Code.

4. This RFQ is summarized in the table below.

Table 1 - Requirement Information.

RFQ Number FA489026Q0013 RFQ Title ACC/A4SA Dronebuster Block 4 Requirement Small Business Set-Aside No NAICS Code 334511 Order Type Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Delivery 120 Days ARO Method of Evaluation Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Commercial Yes Response Due Date 30 June 2026 @ 3:00PM EST

5. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date.

The Government has no obligation to reimburse an Offeror for any costs incurred in the development of the quote.

6. The Government intends to award a single PO as a result of this solicitation. A quote that does not conform to the solicitation will be considered ineligible for award.

7. The CLIN structure is below. Please provide a quote for the requested item and structure your quote IAW Table 2. The requested item in this RFQ is a “brand name or equal” item. If quoting a product other than the one listed in Table 2, provide descriptive literature (e.g., specifications, product data sheets, illustrations, or drawings) for the product indicating that the product being offered is an “equal” product. The information provided should clearly and comprehensively demonstrate how the equal product fulfills or surpasses the requested brand name C-sUAS defeat capability and the salient characteristics included in Attachment 1 – Salient Characteristics. The information provided should clearly explain the link between the proposed product and the salient characteristics, so the Government can make an assessment.

Note: The required 40 C-sUAS defeat capabilities will be delivered to ten different CONUS locations (four per location). Delivery information will be provided at contract award.

Table 2 – CLIN Structure

CLIN DESCRIPTION Part Number QTY UNIT Delivery

0001 Dronebuster Block 4 system with PNT (SNA), handheld cUAS with PNT Attack, handle, batteries FIGDRONEBUSTER_BLK4_PNT_KIT 40 Each 120 Days ARO

8. The provision at FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Products and

Commercial Services, applies to this acquisition. Addendum to this provision is as follows:

a. GENERAL INFORMATION: To ensure timely and equitable quote evaluation, the Offeror must comply with the instructions contained herein. The quote must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this RFQ. Non-conformance with these instructions may result in an unfavorable evaluation. Failure to meet a solicitation requirement may result in the quote being ineligible for award.

b. QUOTE PREPERATION INSTRUCTIONS: The Offeror shall include with its submission: a quote for the requested item structured IAW paragraph 7 and Table 2 above.

c. SUBMISSION OF QUOTE. The quote shall be submitted via email no later than 30 June 2026 @ 3:00 PM EST to jennifer.judkins@us.af.mil and timothy.overby.1@us.af.mil. Incomplete and late quotes will not be considered for evaluation. Offerors are solely responsible for ensuring the Government receives any submission prior to the established response deadline.

d. SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT. The firm must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database at (www.sam.gov) to be considered for award. The prospective awardee shall be registered in SAM prior to award, during performance, and through final payment of a contract agreement, IAW FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management. Also, IAW FAR 52.204-13, System for Award Management Maintenance, a contractor is responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the data within the SAM database and is required to review and update their SAM registration on an annual basis.

e. Additionally, the firm must be registered in Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) at https://wawf.eb.mil at time of quote submittal. UEI, Cage Code, Tax ID, and Terms & Conditions shall be submitted with the quote.

9. The provision at 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services, applies to this acquisition.

As prescribed in 12.205(a)(2), insert a provision substantially as follows:

Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Deviation Date) mailto:jessica.cleaver.1@us.mil http://www.sam.gov/ https://wawf.eb.mil/ https://www.acquisition.gov/far/part-12#FAR_12_301

(a) Evaluation factors. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

1. Technical Acceptability

2. Price

10. BASIS OF AWARD

a. Award will be made in accordance with Part 12 procedures, the procedures specified in the RFQ and on the basis of the lowest priced quote meeting the acceptability standards. A contract may be awarded to a contractor who is deemed responsible IAW RFO 9.1, as supplemented, whose quote conforms to the RFQ’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by the RFQ instructions) and is judged, based on the evaluation factors, to represent the technically acceptable quote with the lowest price.

b. The Government intends to make award based on the initial quote submissions without conducting interchanges. Therefore, each offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to hold interchanges using Interchange Notices (INs) if, during the evaluation, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government. Offeror responses to INs will be considered in making the award decision. Interchanges may be conducted with one, some or all Offerors as the Government is not required to conduct interchanges with any or all contractors responding to this RFQ.

11. TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY

a. The quote will be evaluated against the following Technical Acceptability criteria.

An Unacceptable rating on any criteria in this section renders the entire quote unacceptable, and therefore ineligible for award.

i. The quote shall include a cover letter that contains the Offeror’s name, address, CAGE Code, UEI, Business Size under NAICS Code 334511, and Company Point of Contact email and phone number. The cover letter shall also include a statement that the Offeror’s quote is valid for three (3) months from the quote due date and a statement acknowledging any RFQ amendments.

ii. Acceptability will be determined by the Offeror’s ability to demonstrate a clear understanding of the scope of work and their capability to fulfill this requirement for ACC/A4SA. To fulfill this requirement for ACC/A4SA, the Offeror must be able to provide the required C-sUAS defeat capability (on a brand name “or equal” basis) detailed in Attachment 1

– Salient Characteristics and paragraph 7 and Table 2 above. An Offeror who cannot provide the required item will be determined ineligible for award. Please see the table below for the Acceptable/Unacceptable rating definitions.

Rating Definition Acceptable The Offeror’s quote includes pricing for the required item IAW paragraph 7 and Table 2 above, as well as fulfills or surpasses the following five areas included in Attachment 1 – Salient Characteristics:

Detection and Signal Analysis, Durability/Sustainability, Defeat Mechanism and Spoofing, Frequency Coverage and Spectrum, and Command and Control (C2). The Offeror’s quote includes pricing for the brand name C-sUAS defeat capability specified in Table 2. However, if the Offeror’s quote includes pricing for a capability other than the one specified in Table 2, the Offeror provided descriptive literature (e.g., specifications, product data sheets, illustrations, or drawings) that clearly and comprehensively demonstrates how the equal product fulfills or surpasses the requested brand name C-sUAS defeat capability and the salient characteristics included in Attachment 1 – Salient Characteristics.

The information provided clearly explains the link between the proposed product and the salient characteristics so the Government can make an assessment.

Unacceptable The Offeror’s quote does not include pricing for the required item IAW paragraph 7 and Table 2 above, as well as does not fulfill or surpass the following five areas included in Attachment 1 – Salient Characteristics:

Detection and Signal Analysis, Durability/Sustainability, Defeat Mechanism and Spoofing, Frequency Coverage and Spectrum, and Command and Control (C2). The Offeror’s quote does not include pricing for the brand name C-sUAS defeat capability specified in Table

2. However, if the Offeror’s quote includes pricing for a capability other than the one specified in Table 2, the Offeror did not provide descriptive literature (e.g., specifications, product data sheets, illustrations, or drawings) that clearly and comprehensively demonstrates how the equal product fulfills or surpasses the requested brand name C-sUAS defeat capability and the salient characteristics included in Attachment 1 – Salient Characteristics. The information provided did not clearly explain the link between the proposed product and the salient characteristics so the Government can make an assessment.

12. PRICE

a. The Government will organize the quotes based on the lowest price and will evaluate the lowest priced Offeror for technical acceptability first. If the lowest priced Offeror is technically acceptable and that offer represents the best value for the Government, award of the contract will be made to that Offeror. This process will cease once the lowest priced technically acceptable quote is selected.

i. The price evaluation will be based on the Offeror’s total quoted price for the required item in Table 2 above.

ii. Additionally, pricing will be evaluated for completeness and reasonableness. An Offeror whose price is determined to be incomplete or unreasonable will not be considered for award.

1. Completeness: The quote will be reviewed to determine the extent to which all price elements have been addressed. To be considered complete, the Offeror shall provide a quote for the requested item and structure the quote IAW paragraph 7 and Table 2 above.

2. Reasonableness: For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price to the Government that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. The Government will determine prices fair and reasonable IAW RFO Part 12.

TIMOTHY E. OVERBY, Civ, DAF Contracting Officer

HQ ACC AMIC/PKA

Attachments:

Attachment 1 – Salient Characteristics Attachment 2 – Provisions and Clauses