J-11_Contract_Evaluation.docx

DOCX document 49 KB Posted

Attached to
ESRD Networks Preproposal Conference Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
CMS-2016-ESRD-NETWORKS
Issued by
Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

About this file

Attachment J.11 Contract Evaluation

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to ESRD Networks Preproposal Conference, newest first.
File Type Posted
ESRD_NCC_Questions_ _Answers.pdf PDF
ESRD_Amendment_000008_Cover_Letter_.pdf PDF
Amendment_000008_SF30.pdf PDF
J_24-B_NCC_SOW_10.16.15.pdf PDF
J_24-C_NCC_SOD_10.16.15.pdf PDF
J-4_Reporting_Requirements.docx DOCX document
J-14_Consent_to_Subcontract.docx DOCX document
J-17_Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan_Template.doc DOC document
J-5_Recommendations_for_Sanctions_and_Alternative_Sanctions.docx DOCX document
J-21_Question_Submission_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-3_Paperwork_Reduction_Act.docx DOCX document
J-1_SOD_06182015.docx DOCX document
ESRD_NETWORK_RFP.pdf PDF
J-7_Quality_Improvement_Activities.docx DOCX document
J-6_Learning_and_Action_Networks.docx DOCX document
J-15_HHS_565_Form.pdf PDF
J-22_ESRD_BP_Forms_-_ESRD_2016-20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-9__Healthcare-Associated_Infections_and_the_National_Healthcare_Safety_Network.docx DOCX document
J-2_Style_Guide.docx DOCX document
J-19_Compliance_Program_Attestation.docx DOCX document
J-20_Information_Security_Attestation.docx DOCX document
J-12_CROWNWeb.docx DOCX document
J-8_Grievance_Overview.docx DOCX document
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment J-11 Contract Evaluation

Annual Network contract evaluation of this Performance-based contract shall be solely on the performance measures within this document, based on the CMS Dashboard Performance assessment. The Network COR will be monitoring for contract, as opposed to measure, performance throughout the contract period, and may refer the Network to the Contracting Officer at any time that a Network fails to meet the contract requirements. The COR is expected to work through C.3.19.A in conducting the three-tier process, unless it is apparent to the COR that the contract requirement failure necessitates an immediate referral to the CO.

A Network is required to achieve a score of 49 points out of 70 (a 70% threshold) to receive a passing score. However, to be recommended for automatic contract renewal, the Network shall achieve a score of 60. In addition, Networks shall achieve minimum thresholds on all measures. Failure to achieve minimum thresholds on any measure, or failure to achieve an automatic contract renewal evaluation score of 60 score will result in immediate contract action.

Table J-11A. Results of Annual Evaluation Scores and their associated contract actions

Evaluation Score
Score= <49

or failure to achieve minimum thresholds on all measures

Score= 49 to 59.9
Score= 60 to 70
Result
Refer to OAGM for contract competition
Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) or other contract action per OAGM
Automatic contract renewal for next Option Year.

A weighted score will be used to determine the Performance Improvement score of the evaluation (Table J-11B). A Network shall achieve the Minimum Threshold to receive 1 point; a Network shall achieve the moderate thresholds to receive 3 points, and a Network shall achieve the Maximum Threshold (equivalent to SOW requirements) to receive 5 points. These Minimum, Moderate, and Maximum Thresholds are applicable for all contract years (Base and Option Years). For those measures without a Minimum or Moderate Threshold (that is, those marked N/A), the next highest threshold with a value becomes the minimum threshold that shall be achieved by the Network. All data for the calculations will be derived from the CMS Dashboard based on an evaluation time period as described in the SOW for the various measures.

Table J-11B: Performance Measure Thresholds and Points received within ESRD 2016-20 SOW Sow Section

Topic

Measure Minimum Thresholds (1 Point) Moderate Thresholds (3-Points) Maximum Thresholds (5-Points)

C.4.1.B.1
Pt. Exp. of Care
1. Timeliness IA’s (5 days)
80%
90%
98%
C.4.1.B.1
Pt. Exp. of Care
2. Timeliness Grievances (60 Days)
90%
95%
98%
C.4.1.B.1
Pt. Exp. of Care
3. Patient Grievance Satisfaction
67% Highly Satisfied or Satisfied
75% Highly Satisfied or Satisfied
80% Highly Satisfied or Satisfied
C.4.1.B.1
Pt. Exp. of Care
4. Grievance QIA
10% RI
15% RI
20% RI
C.4.1.B.4
Pt. Exp. of Care
5. ICH CAPHS QIA
N/A
N/A
5% RI
C.4.1.D.1
Vascular Access
6. Long-Term Catheter <90 days
1.5 Points
1.8 Points
2 Points
C.4.1.E.3
HAI
7. HAI BSI
N/A
N/A
5% RI
C.4.1.3.4
HAI
8. HAI Vaccination: Hepatitis-B
90% of Required
95% of Required
100% of Required
C.4.1.3.4
HAI
9. HAI Vaccination: PPV
90% of Required
95% of Required
100% of Required
C.4.2
AIM2
10. AIM2 PHFPP Network Performance
90% of Required
95% of Required
100% of Required
C.4.2
AIM2
11. AIM2 PHFPP Network Disparity
N/A
N/A
100% of Required
C.4.2
AIM2
12. AIM2 PHFPP Network Attributes*
4 out of 6
5 out of 6
6 out of 6
C.4.2
AIM2
13. AIM2 Hospital Coordination (OY3/OY4)
90% of Required
95% of Required
100% of Required
C.4.2
AIM2
14. AIM2 Hospital Coord. Disparity (OY3/OY4)
N/A
N/A
100% of Required
C.4.2
AIM2
15. AIM2 Hospital Coord. Attributes*
4 out of 6
5 out of 6
6 out of 6
C.4.3.A
AIM3
16. QIP QIA
15%
20% RI
25% RI
C.4.3.B
AIM3
17. CDC Data Quality QIA
N/A
N/A
Report results achieved

*Note that the AIM2 PHFPP Network Attributes will be provided by the COR only; RI=Relative Improvement 1 | Page

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .