J-8_Grievance_Overview.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ESRD Networks Preproposal Conference Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- CMS-2016-ESRD-NETWORKS
About this file
Attachment J.8 Grievance Overview
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Grievance Overview for 2016-20 SOW Networks shall conduct case review based on contacts from patients, facilities and other sources. The Grievance procedures are currently being updated and will be available prior to the start of the 2016-20 SOW. Below is a brief overview of the revised requirements for the grievance processes:
1. All contact information will be entered into the Patient Contact Utility (PCU). A separate location in the PCU will be available for non-Grievance/Access-to-Care contacts.
2. All patient contacts will be queried per their willingness to participate in the CMS Patient Grievance survey. Networks will provide monthly updates of these patients to the National Coordinating Center (NCC).
3. Cases from person other than patient (but not facility) requires at least documentation of appointed representative status; Network sends letter and attempts to get written documentation (use appointed representative template #1).
4. For all cases the Network determines the level of confidentiality required. Any case may be anonymous, confidential or open-sharing of the patient’s name. If the Network cannot process the case based on the level of sharing that the grievant is willing to do, the Network will inform the grievant they cannot continue unless they are willing to come to the level necessary. If the grievant is unwilling to escalate their sharing level, the Network will close the case.
5. If the circumstances of the case escalate the Network will process the case at the higher level and meet all requirements for that type of case.
4. Grievances are one of five “types”, as shown below. Cases may include multiple issues, so long as they all meet the type criteria. Networks may have different types of grievances being processed simultaneously for a single grievant. Case types are:
| A. Immediate Advocacy: | |
| 1. ‘Simple’ non-Quality of Care (QoC) issues | |
| 2. Must be completed in 5 business days (no extensions) | |
| a. if cannot be completed in 5 days must be made Grievance | |
| b. Complex and/or QoC cases must be Grievances | |
| c. Cases do not require letters, unless Referral is part of case | |
| 3. Cases should be documented appropriately in PCU | |
| B. General Grievances: | |
| 1. More complex, non-QoC issues | |
| 2. Requires Acknowledgement letter (Use #2 template provided) | |
| a. Summary of issues | |
| b. Sent within 2 business days from initial contact | |
| c. Network processes case, documents in PCU | |
| d. If Network needs records (of any type) from facility, Facility must provide within 5 business days of request (use template #3 provided) | |
| e. Network has 60 calendar days from initial contact to complete case | |
| f. If case becomes General Grievance from Immediate Advocacy (IA), 60 days is from initial contact, not from when becomes GG. | |
| g. Network provides summary letter to grievant (patient), with cc, as appropriate to facility/practitioners (use template #4); |
i. No Facility/practitioner letter review; may contact Network for corrections;
ii. If contacted, Network determines if revised letter needs to be sent out
h. There are no re-reviews
i. Patient may request that case be re-opened if new information is provided
ii. Patient may contact CMS Regional Office (RO)/State Survey Agency (SSA)
iii. CMS RO will check for Network Case Review processes
| C. Quality of Care Grievances: | |
| 1. For QoC issues only. Uses same templates as General Grievances | |
| 2. Request for records from facility (medical records, other information) due from facility within 5 business days | |
| 3. QoC may be patient specific or general | |
| a. Cases processed essentially the same | |
| b. Difference is whether there is a specific-patient the QoC is focused on. | |
| 4. Network determines if QoC needs to be referred to SSA; |
a. Not all will need referral to SSA
b. If referred to SSA, notify the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) immediately (same day as SSA)
5. Network determines if case needs to be referred to Medical Review Board (MRB)
a. Not all cases will need MRB, if RN (with Nephrology exp.) can handle
b. Cases to MRB are for Physician review;
| D. “At-Risk” Access-to-Care cases: | |
| 1. There is no time limit for “At-Risk” cases | |
| 2. “Aversion” is identified by facility indicating that patient is no longer “at risk” | |
| 3. Notification may be from patient or facility | |
| a. If patient, treat as ‘grievance’, with appropriate letters, etc. | |
| b. if facility, no letters are necessary, but document in PCU | |
| E. Access-to-Care cases: | |
| 1. There is no time limit for “Access-to-Care cases | |
| 2. Same requirements as “At-Risk” cases | |
| 3. Network shall Notificy SSA/COR if facility fails to follow Conditions for Coverage (CFC) within 1 business day | |
| F. Referrals | |
| 1. Referrals are not a case type | |
| 2. Any referrals require a summary letter (template #4) to the grievant, unless the contact was anonymous, and the Network was able to process the case at this level. |
G. Non Grievance/Access to care contacts
1. Networks will provide sufficient information to document the contact H. Linkages
1. Linkages between cases will be made between contacts in the PCU as appropriate. Cases may be linked between multiple cases. This is especially true when Non-Grievance/Access to care contacts escalate into grievances/Access-to-care contacts
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .