Classification_and_Total_Compensation_Study.pdf

PDF 390 KB Posted

Attached to
Classification and Total Compensation Study
Solicitation number
2026-RFp-002
Issued by
Riverside County, Huntington Beach City, California

About this file

This is a Request for Proposal (RFP #2026-RFp-002) issued by Valley Sanitary District, a wastewater management agency serving over 28,000 connections across a 19.5 square mile service area in Riverside County, California. The District seeks a qualified human resources and compensation consulting firm to conduct a comprehensive Classification and Total Compensation Study to ensure the organization's classification and compensation systems are internally equitable, externally competitive, legally compliant, fiscally responsible, and supportive of employee recruitment and retention. The study encompasses six primary tasks: project initiation and employee engagement, classification and job description review, market and total compensation analysis, internal equity and compensation recommendations, implementation planning with fiscal impact analysis, and final report preparation with presentations. The RFP was released on August 18, 2026, with a deadline for questions on September 14, 2026, at 4:00 p.m., and a proposal submission deadline of October 2, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. The Valley Sanitary District Board of Directors is scheduled to consider the award on October 27, 2026. All proposals must be submitted electronically through the District's eProcurement Portal, with responses evaluated based on understanding of project needs (20 points), technical approach and methodology (25 points), relevant qualifications and experience (20 points), project team qualifications (15 points), project schedule and deliverable capability (10 points), and cost and overall value (10 points).

Proposers must provide a lump sum, not-to-exceed fee proposal broken down by task, with hourly rates for all personnel, and submitted as a sealed cost proposal separate from technical materials. The District requires proposers to demonstrate California licensing, provide a minimum of four client references preferably from city, county, or special district governments for similar work performed within the last five years, and submit resumes of key personnel. Pricing is valid for 90 days from the proposal due date, and the District reserves the right to negotiate with the selected proposer or proceed to the next qualified candidate if negotiations fail. All final work products, including reports, job descriptions, salary schedules, and supporting materials, shall become the property of Valley Sanitary District and must be provided in both PDF and editable native formats (Microsoft Word and Excel). The District reserves the right to cancel the RFP, accept or reject any proposals, waive irregularities, or award multiple contracts if deemed in its best interest.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

2026-RFp-002

CLASSIFICATION AND TOTAL COMPENSATION STUDY

Valley Sanitary District

45500 Van Buren Street

Indio, CA 92201

RELEASE DATE: August 18, 2026

DEADLINE FOR QUESTIONS: September 14, 2026

RESPONSE DEADLINE: October 2, 2026, 4:00 pm

RESPONSES MUST BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY TO:

https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/valley-sanitary https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/valley-sanitary

Valley Sanitary District

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

Classification and Total Compensation Study

I. INTRODUCTION

II. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

III. SCOPE OF WORK

IV. EVALUATION CRITERIA

V. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE

Attachments:

A - Sample VSD Professional Services Agreement

B - VSD Scope of Work Comp & Class Study - 6 Tasks

C - Combined Budget Book FY27

Request For Proposal #2026-RFp-002 Title: Classification and Total Compensation Study

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Summary

Valley Sanitary District ("District" or "VSD") is seeking a qualified human resources and compensation consulting firm ("Consultant") to conduct a comprehensive Classification and Total Compensation Study.

The purpose of the study is to ensure the District’s classification and compensation system is internally equitable, externally competitive, legally compliant, fiscally responsible, and supportive of employee recruitment and retention.

The Consultant shall review the District’s existing classifications, job descriptions, organizational relationships, compensation structure, and total compensation practices and provide recommendations for an updated and sustainable classification and compensation system.

1.2. Background

The Valley Sanitary District is located in the Coachella Valley about 20 miles southwest of the Palm

Springs airport. VSD is a wastewater district, founded in 1925, operating under the Sanitary District Act of 1923. VSD has over 28,000 service connections in a 19.5 square mile service area serving a population of about 89,000 in the communities of Indio, Coachella, La Quinta, and unincorporated Riverside County.

VSD is governed by a five-member Board of Directors and led by a senior management team comprised of a General Manager, District Engineer, Wastewater Operations Manager, and Chief Administrative

Officer.

1.3. Contact Information

Holly Gould

Clerk of the Board

45500 Van Buren St.

Indio, CA 92201

Email: hevans@valley-sanitary.org

Phone: (760) 238-5400 Ext: 135

Department:

Administration

1.4. Timeline

Project Release Date August 18, 2026

Question Submission Deadline September 14, 2026, 4:00pm

Proposal Submission Deadline October 2, 2026, 4:00pm mailto:hevans@valley-sanitary.org tel:(760)238-5400;ext=135

VSD Board Consideration of Award October 27, 2026

2. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

2.1. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

All proposers must download and review the Request for Proposal documents available for download under the ATTACHMENTS section.

All responses must adhere to the requirements set forth in the Proposal Requirements section below.

Failure to adhere to these requirements or the inclusion of conditions, limitations or misrepresentations may be cause for rejection of the submittal.

Proposals must be received no later than Friday, October 2, 2026, on or before 4:00 pm via the VENDOR

QUESTIONNAIRE section. Proposals received after the stipulated deadline will not be accepted by VSD's eProcurement Portal. Please note that mailed, hand-delivered, faxed, or emailed proposals will not be accepted.

2.2. VSD CONTACT

The principal contact for VSD will be Holly Gould, Clerk of the Board, (760) 238-5400, hevans@valley-sanitary.org or a designated representative, who will coordinate the assistance to be provided by VSD to the Proposer. No other members of VSD’s staff or VSD’s Board should be contacted about this procurement during the RFP process. Any and all inquiries and comments regarding this RFP must be communicated in writing, unless otherwise instructed by VSD. VSD may, in its sole discretion, disqualify any Proposer who engages in any prohibited communications.

2.3. REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION

All questions, requests for interpretations or clarifications, either administrative or technical must be requested in writing and directed to VSD via the District's eProcurement Portal Q&A feature. All written questions, if answered, will be answered in writing, conveyed to all interested firms, and posted on

VSD’s eProcurement Portal. Oral statements by any persons should be considered unverified information unless confirmed in writing. To ensure a response, questions must be received in writing by

4:00 pm local time on Monday, September 14, 2026.

2.4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

Proposal responses must adhere to the requirements set forth in this section, both for content and sequence. Failure to adhere to these requirements or the inclusion of conditions, limitations or misrepresentations may be cause for rejection of the submittal. Utilize font size large enough to be easily legible, but not smaller than 10 point.

The proposal must be submitted via VSD's eProcurement Portal.

A. Cover Letter Provide a cover letter and introduction, including the name and address of the organization and individual submitting the proposal, together with the name, address, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail address of the contact person who will be authorized to represent the organization, and an expression of the Proposer’s ability and desire to meet the requirements of this

RFP. The letter must be signed by an individual authorized to bind the firm contractually.

https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/valley-sanitary/projects/293095/document?section=2821546 https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/valley-sanitary/projects/293095/document?section=2821548 https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/valley-sanitary/projects/293095/document?section=2821548

B. Proposer Statement of Qualifications Describe the Proposer’s resources, experience, and capabilities as they relate to providing the Services. Submit in the order identified below:

1. Executive Summary. An executive summary should briefly describe the Proposer’s qualifications and ability to perform the Services.

2. Qualifications and Experience. The proposal should:

a. Provide a description of how the Proposer’s experience, technical and professional skills will meet the goals and fulfill the general functions identified in this RFP.

b. Any key staff members who would be involved in the performance of the scope of work.

Provide their resumes, describe their experience, and identify their proposed role for the Project.

c. State the number of years the firm has conducted business.

d. Provide a description of the three most relevant contracts held within the last five years.

3. Evidence Of California Licensing. The proposal should include appropriate documentation showing the Proposer is properly licensed in the State of California to perform the Services requested in the scope of work.

4. References. The Proposer shall provide a minimum of four (4) client references, preferably city, county, or special district governments for whom the Proposer has previously performed services of similar type and scope within the last 5 years.

5. Subcontractors. The Proposer shall identify functions that are likely to be subcontracted and identify the subcontractor that is anticipated to perform each function, if known at this time.

C. Proposed Method to Accomplish the Work Describe the technical and management approach to providing the Services to VSD. Proposer should take into account the scope of the Project, goals of VSD, and general functions required. Include a draft schedule of tasks, milestones, and deliverables that will provide for timely provision of the Project. In reviewing the scope of work, the Proposer may identify additional necessary tasks and is invited to bring these to VSD’s attention within the discussion of its proposed method to accomplish the Project.

D. Certification of Proposal This section shall state: “The undersigned hereby submits its proposal and, by doing so, agrees to furnish services to VSD in accordance with the Request for Proposal (RFP), and to be bound by the terms and conditions of the RFP.”

E. Sealed Fee Proposal Please provide a lump sum, not-to-exceed fee proposal for the Project. The fee proposal shall be broken down by task and further broken down by staff, subconsultant costs, and expenses for each task. The fee proposal shall include hourly rates for all personnel.

2.5. PROPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS

A. No Deviations from the RFP. In submitting a proposal in response to this RFP, Proposer is certifying that it takes no exceptions to this RFP including, but not limited to, the Agreement attached hereto as

Exhibit “A”. If any exceptions are taken, such exceptions must be clearly noted in the proposal and may be reason for rejection of the proposal. As such, Proposer is directed to carefully review the proposed

Agreement and, in particular, the insurance and indemnification provisions therein.

B. Collusion. By submitting a Proposal, each Proposer represents and warrants that its Proposal is genuine and not a sham or collusive or made in the interest of or on behalf of any person not named therein; that the Proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other person to submit a sham Proposal, or any other person to refrain from submitting a Proposal; and that the Proposer has not, in any manner, sought collusion to secure any improper advantage over any other person submitting a Proposal.

C. Conflicts of Interest. Proposers shall comply with all regulations and laws dealing with conflict of interest disclosure and reporting. Proposers shall not be engaged if a conflict of interest exists.

D. Withdrawal of Proposals. A Proposer may withdraw its proposal before the expiration of the time for submission of proposals by notifying and requesting VSD’s representative remove the Proposer’s submission.

E. Financial Health and Reputation. VSD reserves the right to consider the financial responsibility and general complexity of each Proposer, as well as its reputation within the industry to determine if the

Proposer has the apparent ability to meet and complete successfully the requirements of the work.

Upon request, the Proposer shall provide a financial statement, audited if necessary, in addition to any other information requested by VSD.

F. Confidentiality of Proposal. Proposals submitted in response to this RFP shall be held confidential by

VSD and shall not be subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Cal. Government

Code section 6250 et seq.) until after either VSD and the successful Proposer have completed negotiations and entered into an Agreement or VSD has rejected all proposals. All correspondence with

VSD including responses to this RFP will become the exclusive property of VSD and will become public records under the California Public Records Act. VSD will have no liability to the Proposer or other party as a result of any public disclosure of any proposal or the Agreement. If a Proposer desires to exclude a portion of its proposal from disclosure under the California Public Records Act, the Proposer must mark it as such and state the specific provision in the California Public Records Act which provides the exemption as well as the factual basis for claiming the exemption. For example, if a Proposer submits trade secret information, the Proposer must plainly mark the information as “Trade Secret” and refer to the appropriate section of the California Public Records Act which provides the exemption as well as the factual basis for claiming the exemption. If a request is made for information marked “Confidential”, “Trade Secret” or “Proprietary” (“Proprietary Information”), VSD will provide Proposers who submitted the information with reasonable notice to seek protection from disclosure by a court of competent jurisdiction. Proposer shall have five (5) working days after receipt of such notice to give VSD written notice of Proposer's objection to VSD's release of Proprietary Information. Proposer shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless VSD, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney's fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. Proposals which indiscriminately identify all or most of the proposal as exempt from disclosure without justification may be deemed unresponsive and disqualified from further participation in this RFP.

2.6. ADDENDA

VSD reserves the right to revise the RFP prior to the time set to receive proposals. Revisions, if any, shall be made by written addenda via VSD's eProcurement Portal. All addenda issued by VSD shall be included in the proposal and made part of the RFP. Each Proposer shall leave with VSD its name, and e-mail address for the purpose of receiving Addenda. Notices of addenda will be sent to all subscribed bidders following this project, and posted via VSD's eProcurement Portal. Proposers are responsible for ensuring that they have received any and all addenda. Each Proposer should monitor the project via the eProcurement Portal to verify that it has received all addenda issued, if any, prior to the bid opening.

Failure to acknowledge receipt of all addenda via VSD's eProcurement Portal may result in bid rejection.

2.7. EVALUATION CRITERIA

The proposal evaluation criteria include:

• Understanding of the project and District needs

• Technical approach, methodology, and work plan

• Relevant qualifications and experience

• Qualifications of project team and key personnel

• Project schedule and ability to meet deliverables

• Cost and overall value

During the evaluation process, VSD reserves the right, where it may serve VSD's best interest, to request additional information or clarifications from Proposers, or to allow corrections of errors or omissions.

Proposers may be invited to make an oral presentation.

The contract, if awarded, shall be to the most qualified Proposer, which submits the proposal that, in the sole judgment of VSD, is in the best interest of VSD.

Upon selection of a Proposer, VSD will endeavor to negotiate a mutually agreeable agreement with the selected Proposer. In the event that VSD is unable to reach agreement, VSD will proceed, at its sole discretion, to negotiate with the next Proposer selected by VSD. VSD reserves the right to contract for services in the manner that most benefits VSD including awarding more than one (1) contract if desired.

After negotiating a proposed Agreement that is fair and reasonable, VSD staff will make the final recommendation to VSD Board concerning the proposed Agreement. VSD Board has the final authority to approve or reject the Agreement.

2.8. PROTESTS

A. Protest Contents. Protests based on the content of the RFP shall be submitted to VSD no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the scheduled proposal submittal deadline. If necessary, the proposal submittal deadline may be extended pending a resolution of the protest. Proposer may protest a contract award if the Proposer believes that the award was inconsistent with VSD policy or this RFP is not in compliance with law. A protest must be filed in writing with VSD (email is not acceptable) within five (5) business days after receipt of notification of the intended contract award. Any protest submitted after 5 p.m. of the fifth business day after notification of the intended contract award will be rejected by

VSD as invalid and the Proposer’s failure to timely file a protest will waive the Proposer’s right to protest the contract award. The Proposer’s protest must include supporting documentation, legal authorities in support of the grounds for the protest and the name, address and telephone number of the person representing the Proposer for purposes of the protest. Any matters not set forth in the protest shall be deemed waived.

B. VSD Review. VSD will review and evaluate the basis of the protest provided the protest is filed in strict conformity with the foregoing. VSD shall provide the Proposer submitting the protest with a written statement concurring with or denying the protest. Action by VSD relative to the protest will be final and not subject to appeal or reconsideration. The procedure and time limits set forth in this section are mandatory and are the Proposer’s sole and exclusive remedy in the event of protest. Failure to comply with these procedures will constitute a waiver of any right to further pursue the protest, including filing a Government Code claim or legal proceedings.

2.9. GENERAL CONDITIONS

A. Amendments to Proposals. Unless specifically requested by VSD, no amendment, addendum or modification will be accepted after a proposal has been submitted to VSD. If a change to a proposal that has been submitted is desired, the submitted proposal must be withdrawn and the replacement proposal submitted via VSD's eProcurement Portal prior to the deadline stated herein for receiving proposals.

B. Non-Responsive Proposals. A proposal may be considered non-responsive if conditional, incomplete, or if it contains alterations of form, additions not called for, or other irregularities that may constitute a material change to the proposal.

C. Costs for Preparing. VSD will not compensate any Proposer for the cost of preparing any proposal, and all materials submitted with a proposal shall become the property of VSD. VSD will retain all proposals submitted and may use any idea in a proposal regardless of whether that proposal is selected.

D. Cancellation. VSD reserves the right to cancel this request for proposals at any time prior to contract award without obligation in any manner for proposal preparation, interview, fee negotiation or other associated marketing costs.

E. Price Validity. Prices provided by Proposers are valid for 90 days from the proposal due date. VSD intends to award the contract within this time but may request an extension from the Proposers to hold pricing, until negotiations are complete and the contract is awarded.

F. No Commitment to Award. Issuance of request for proposals and receipt of proposals does not commit VSD to award a contract. VSD expressly reserves the right to postpone the proposal for its own convenience, to accept or reject any or all proposals received, to negotiate with more than one Proposer concurrently, or to cancel all or part of this request for proposals.

G. Right to Negotiate and/or Reject Proposals. VSD reserves the right to negotiate any price or provision, task order or service, accept any part or all of any proposals, waive any irregularities, and to reject any and all, or parts of any and all proposals, whenever, in the sole opinion of VSD, such action shall serve its best interests and those of the tax-paying public. The Agreement, if any is awarded, will go to the Proposer whose proposal best meets VSD’s requirements.

3. SCOPE OF WORK

3.1. Scope of Work Tasks Include:

TASK 1 - PROJECT INITIATION AND EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

The Consultant shall meet with District management to confirm the project objectives, methodology, schedule, data requirements, and communication process.

The Consultant shall provide an appropriate process for obtaining input from employees, supervisors, and management. The process may include position questionnaires, interviews, focus groups, job audits, or other methods recommended by the Consultant.

The Consultant shall provide periodic project updates and identify issues requiring District direction or approval.

Deliverables:

• Project work plan and schedule

• Employee communication/job analysis materials

• Periodic project updates

TASK 2 - CLASSIFICATION AND JOB DESCRIPTION REVIEW

The Consultant shall review the District’s existing classification structure and job descriptions to determine whether classifications accurately reflect the duties, responsibilities, qualifications, organizational relationships, and regulatory requirements of each position.

The Consultant shall:

• Identify outdated, overlapping, or potentially misallocated classifications

• Recommend appropriate classification series and career progression opportunities

• Review classification relationships and organizational alignment

• Review FLSA exempt/non-exempt status and other applicable classification requirements

• Update existing job descriptions and develop new classifications where appropriate

Deliverables:

• Recommended classification structure and allocations

• Classification crosswalk

• FLSA recommendations

• Final updated job descriptions in editable format

TASK 3 - MARKET AND TOTAL COMPENSATION ANALYSIS

In consultation with the District, the Consultant shall identify appropriate comparable public agencies and benchmark classifications.

The Consultant shall conduct a market survey comparing VSD’s compensation to comparable agencies.

Job matches shall be based on actual duties, responsibilities, qualifications, and organizational level rather than job title alone.

The analysis shall include, as appropriate, base salary; employer-paid benefits; retirement contributions;

health benefits; leave benefits; certification and educational incentive pay; bilingual, standby, callback, shift, acting and other special compensation; and other significant compensation elements necessary to provide a meaningful total compensation comparison.

The Consultant shall identify VSD’s competitive market position and significant areas in which compensation differs from the selected labor market.

Deliverables:

• Comparable agency and benchmark classification recommendations

• Market survey results

• Base salary and total compensation analysis

• Supporting survey data

TASK 4 - INTERNAL EQUITY AND COMPENSATION RECOMMENDATIONS

The Consultant shall evaluate internal salary relationships and recommend a classification and compensation structure that appropriately balances external market competitiveness and internal equity.

The analysis shall identify significant salary compression, compaction, inversion, or other internal equity concerns.

The Consultant shall recommend salary ranges and range assignments for District classifications;

appropriate salary relationships and differentials; salary range/step structure, as applicable; treatment of benchmark and non-benchmark classifications; career progression opportunities; special compensation or incentive changes, where appropriate; and an appropriate compensation philosophy and market position for the District.

Deliverables:

• Internal equity analysis

• Recommended classification and compensation plan

• Recommended salary schedule

TASK 5 - IMPLEMENTATION AND FISCAL IMPACT

The Consultant shall develop a practical implementation strategy for the recommended classification and compensation plan.

The Consultant shall calculate the estimated fiscal impact of the recommendations and provide implementation alternatives for District consideration. Alternatives may include immediate, phased, or prioritized implementation based on market competitiveness, internal equity, recruitment and retention, and fiscal considerations.

The Consultant shall provide the District with sufficient information to evaluate the financial and organizational impacts of each recommended approach.

Deliverables:

• Fiscal impact analysis

• Implementation alternatives

• Recommended implementation strategy

• Supporting calculations in editable format

TASK 6 - FINAL REPORT AND PRESENTATIONS

The Consultant shall prepare a draft and final Classification and Total Compensation Study documenting the methodology, findings, market analysis, classification recommendations, compensation recommendations, fiscal impacts, and implementation considerations.

Employees shall be provided an appropriate opportunity to review classification recommendations affecting their positions and submit additional information for consideration before recommendations are finalized.

The Consultant shall present the findings and recommendations to District management and the Board of Directors.

The Consultant shall also provide recommendations for maintaining the classification and compensation system following completion of the study.

Deliverables:

• Draft report

• Final Classification and Total Compensation Study

• Final updated job descriptions

• Recommended salary schedule

• Implementation/fiscal impact model

• Management presentation

• Board presentation

• Recommendations for ongoing administration and maintenance

FINAL WORK PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS

All final reports, job descriptions, salary schedules, survey data, calculations, and other materials developed as part of the study shall become the property of Valley Sanitary District and shall be provided electronically in PDF and applicable native editable formats, including Microsoft Word and

Excel.

4. EVALUATION CRITERIA

During the evaluation process, VSD reserves the right, where it may serve VSD's best interest, to request additional information or clarifications from Proposers, or to allow corrections of errors or omissions.

Proposers may be invited to make an oral presentation.

The contract, if awarded, shall be to the most qualified Proposer, which submits the proposal that, in the sole judgment of VSD, is in the best interest of VSD.

Upon selection of a Proposer, VSD will endeavor to negotiate a mutually agreeable agreement with the selected Proposer. In the event that VSD is unable to reach agreement, VSD will proceed, at its sole discretion, to negotiate with the next Proposer selected by VSD. VSD reserves the right to contract for services in the manner that most benefits VSD including awarding more than one (1) contract if desired.

After negotiating a proposed Agreement that is fair and reasonable, VSD staff will make the final recommendation to VSD Board concerning the proposed Agreement. VSD Board has the final authority to approve or reject the Agreement.

No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points)

1. Understanding of the Project and District

Needs Points Based 20

(20% of Total)

2. Technical Approach, Methodology, and Work

Plan Points Based 25

(25% of Total)

3. Relevant Qualifications and Experience Points Based 20 (20% of Total)

4. Qualifications of Project Team and Key

Personnel Points Based 15

(15% of Total)

5. Project Schedule and Ability to Meet

Deliverables Points Based 10

(10% of Total)

6. Cost and Overall Value Points Based 10 (10% of Total)

5. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE

5.1. Upload Technical Proposal*

Please upload your Technical Proposal here. Please do not include COST.

*Response required

5.2. Upload Sealed Fee Proposal*

Please submit the Cost Proposal only here.

*Response required

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Summary
1.2. Background
1.3. Contact Information
1.4. Timeline
2. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS
2.1. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
2.2. VSD CONTACT
2.3. REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION
2.4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
2.5. PROPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
2.6. ADDENDA
2.7. EVALUATION CRITERIA
2.8. PROTESTS
2.9. GENERAL CONDITIONS
3. SCOPE OF WORK
3.1. Scope of Work Tasks Include:
4. EVALUATION CRITERIA
5. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
5.1. Upload Technical Proposal*
5.2. Upload Sealed Fee Proposal*

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .