Cisco Network Switch Brand Name Justification.pdf
PDF 327 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Purchase of a Cisco Network Switch
- Solicitation number
- 75H71425Q00006
About this file
This document is a Brand Name Justification form for a Cisco Network Switch procurement by the Indian Health Service (IHS) Tucson Area Office. The solicitation (75H71425Q00006) is a set-aside for Indian Small Business Economic Enterprise (ISBEE) to purchase Cisco network switches specifically for the Casa Grande, AZ office. The justification details why only Cisco switches will be considered, citing requirements from IHS Headquarters and the Network Operations Support Center (NOSC) that mandate Cisco infrastructure for network compatibility, security, and operational efficiency.
Key procurement details include a solicitation release on February 27, 2025, with quotes due by March 31, 2025, at 5:00 PM MST. The contract will be a single award, firm-fixed-price type, with equipment delivery expected 4-6 weeks after award. Potential vendors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and utilize the Invoice Processing Platform (IPP) for payments. The procurement is classified under NAICS code 334111, with all future communications and documents to be distributed solely through SAM.gov. The primary point of contact is Susan Protho, Contracting Officer, with a secondary contact of Bernard Howell, Contracting Officer Representative.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 75H71425Q00006 Amend 0001.pdf | ||
| Price Schedule Revised.docx | DOCX document | |
| Price Schedule.docx | DOCX document | |
| Instructions to Offerors.docx | DOCX document | |
| Terms and Conditions New 3725.docx | DOCX document | |
| IEE Representation Form.pdf | ||
| 75H71425Q00006 SF1449.pdf | ||
| 4. SOW_Network Switch_FY2025 03525.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRAND NAME JUSTIFICATION
FAR 6.302-1(c) / 13.106-1
Per 6.302-1(c)(ii)(C), The justification shall be posted with the solicitation (see 5.102(a)(6) and 16.505(a)(4)(iii)(A)).
Agency/Office Name: Date:
Yes No (If your answer is “no,” please complete the rest of this document)
(If the answer is “yes,” sign this document, send in with your Purchase Request (PR) package and provide a list of your salient characteristics/specifications.
5. If the answer to No. 4 is “no,” complete the following:
A. Because of patent rights, copyrights, propriety secret processes, control of certain materials or components providing superior utility or capability, purchasing a different/similar product cannot be obtained. See below for explanation.
B. Because program requirements cannot be modified so that competitive products or services may be used. See below for explanation.
C. Because the product or service is unique and easily established as on-of-a kind. See below for explanation.
6. If the answer to No. 4 is “no,” please indicate reason(s) for restricting competition.
The only restriction under this action is the utilization of brand name specifications based on the following facts:
1. “Brand Name” of product:
2. Description of “brand name” product:
3. Name of manufacturer of “brand name” product:
4. The “brand name” provided is to identify the standard of quality necessary. Equivalents can/will be considered:
BRAND NAME JUSTIFICATION
FAR 6.302-1(c) / 13.106-1
Per 6.302-1(c)(ii)(C), The justification shall be posted with the solicitation (see 5.102(a)(6) and 16.505(a)(4)(iii)(A)).
Agency/Office Name: Date:
Indicate other reasons for restricting competition:
7. Describe the market research conducted (how it was made, websites, tests, calls, interviews made, etc.) and the results of the research.
8. Program Office Certification This is to certify that the portion of this justification, developed by the undersigned program office personnel, including supporting information and/or data verifying the Government’s minimum needs or requirements, or other rationale for limited sources, are accurate and complete.
Official Name & Title Signature Date Contracting Officer’s Representative Requestor’s Immediate Supervisor
9. Contracting Officer Certification This is to certify that the justification for the proposed acquisition has been reviewed, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information and/or data provided support the rationale and justification therefore, recommendation for approval is accurate and complete.
Official Name & Title Signature Date Contracting Officer
| Date: 02/27/2025 |
| Brand Name of product: Cisco |
| 1: Cisco Switches, from Cisco Systems, Inc., deliver advanced Layer 2/3 switching and robust security (e.g., MACsec) for Federal networks. They offer scalability, high-speed connectivity, and compatibility with existing Cisco infrastructure. Proven reliability and trusted support justify the brand-name choice. |
| Name of manufacturer of brand name product: Cisco Systems, Inc |
| be considered: No |
| A: Off |
| B: On |
| C: Off |
| Date_2: 02/27/2025 |
| Text1: The acquisition of Cisco Switches is restricted to this brand due to program requirements mandated by IHS HQ and the NOSC, which exclusively specify Cisco switches for the internal network. This restriction stems from the need for seamless interoperability with the existing Cisco-based infrastructure, ensuring consistent network management, security protocols, and operational efficiency across the enterprise. HQ and NOSC policies dictate that only Cisco switches can meet the stringent technical and security standards required to safeguard sensitive Federal data and comply with regulations like NIST 800-53. Modifying these requirements to accommodate competitive products would compromise network uniformity, increase integration risks, and necessitate costly retraining and reconfiguration. Thus, restricting competition to Cisco Switches is essential to maintain mission-critical reliability and adherence to established network architecture standards. |
| Text3: Tucson Area Office Indian Health Service |
| Text19: Tucson Area Office Indian Health Service |
| Text4: Bernard Howell |
Supervisory IT Specialist Text5: Dixie Gaikowski Area Director Text6: Susan Protho Supervisory Contract Specialist
| DateCOR: 02/27/2025 | |
| DateSupv: | |
| DateCO: | |
| 2025-02-27T08:49:33-0700 | |
| BERNARD HOWELL -S |
| 2025-03-05T14:26:20-0700 | |
| David H. Jacobs -S |
| 2025-03-05T14:52:29-0700 | |
| Susan M. Protho -S |
| Text10: Staff expertise, Cisco-specific support contracts, and proven Federal deployment success preclude alternatives. Non-Cisco devices risk security gaps, retraining costs, and supply chain uncertainties. This ensures reliability, efficiency, and compliance with agency standards. |
| Text11: Market Research was limited due to IHS HQ and NOSC specifying the Cisco Switch model for network compatibility. Three vendors were contacted to obtain competitive quotes. No broader analysis was conducted, as the mandate restricted alternative options. This ensured pricing and availability within the required Cisco ecosystem. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .