CDRL - SMBA Implementation Phase RFI.pdf

Effective Date: TBD, DRAFT Expiration Date: TBD, DRAFT

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

470-SMBA-00439, Revision DRAFT LEO Programs Division, Code 470

Near Earth Orbit Network (NEON) Sounder for Microwave-Based

Applications (SMBA) Contract Data Requirements List

(CDRL)

NOAA / NASA

Goddard Space Flight Center

Greenbelt, Maryland

GSFC LEO CMO

<Date>

DRAFT

https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm

Effective Date: DRAFT ii Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

Sounder for Microwave-Based Applications (SMBA)

Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) NEON Electronic Signature Page

Prepared By:

Jessica Knizhnik

Approved By:

Roger Clason

Electronic Approval available on-line at: https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov iii Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

Preface

This document is under LEO Division configuration control. Once this document is approved, LEO approved changes are handled in accordance with Class I and Class II change control requirements as described in the LEO Configuration Management Procedures, and changes to this document shall be made by complete revision.

Any questions should be addressed to:

LEO Configuration Management Office NASA/GSFC Code 470 Greenbelt, MD 20771 iv Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

Change History Log

Revision Effective Date Description of Changes

Rev - MM/DD/2024 Initial Release per 470-CCR-24-0TBD v Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Export Control Limitations

1.1.1 ITAR Technical Data:

1.1.2 EAR Technical Data:

1.2 Proprietary Data

1.3 Prior Submission Deliveries

1.4 Due Dates – Related Definitions

1.5 Media – Related Definitions

1.6 Category – Related Definitions

1.7 Applicability

1.8 Updates

1.9 Documentation Change Procedures

1.10 Delivery Instructions

2 DATA ITEM DESCRIPTIONS

2.1 Calibration/Validation Data Items

2.2 Integration and Test Data Items

2.3 Mission Assurance Data Items

2.4 On Orbit Data Items

2.5 Project Management Data Items

2.6 Review Data Items

2.7 Software Data Items

2.8 Systems Engineering Data Items

APPENDIX A ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

List of Tables

Table 1. Contract Deliverable Items List (CDRL)

List of Figures

Figure 1. GSFC 5 x 5 Risk Definitions

NEON SMBA CDRL 470-SMBA-00439, Revision DRAF T

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

1 INTRODUCTION

This Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) document defines the requirements for deliverable documentation to be provided by the Sounder for Microwave-Based Applications (SMBA) Contractor. Section 1 includes definitions and instructions for distribution. Table 1 presents the CDRL item by item, with due dates, quantity, and media format. Section 2 provides the Data Item Description (DID), a description of each item, which provides the use for the deliverable and the required preparation information. Except where specifically indicated to the contrary, the formats and drawing standards used shall be those normally used by the Contractor and by its subcontractors.

1.1 Export Control Limitations

Some of the content for documents provided by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (Goddard Space Flight Center [GSFC]) and United States (U.S.)

industry will be subject to the United States International Traffic In Arms Regulations (ITAR), 22 CFR 120-130, by the United States Department of State and/or the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), 15 CFR 730-744, by the Unites States Department of Commerce. NASA may exchange technical information with the foreign partners and related entities (e.g.

contractors and subcontractors) utilizing licensing exemptions to the ITAR and/or EAR, supported by the authority and content of the standing Letter of Agreement (LOA) and/or the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between NASA/NOAA and that foreign partner, as appropriate. U.S. industry may exchange ITAR sensitive technical data under the authority and conditions of Technical Assistance Agreements (TAA), approved by the U.S. Department of State as appropriate.

NASA and U.S. industry will mark and thus notify foreign partners and related entities of the exchange of ITAR and/or EAR sensitive data with variations of the following language:

1.1.1 ITAR Technical Data:

The unclassified technical information included is controlled under the U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR), 22 CFR 120-130, by the U.S. Department of State. Transfer of this information to a foreign person or entity requires an export license issued by the U.S.

Department of State or an ITAR exemption to the license requirement prior to the export of transfer.

These items are licensed by the United States for ultimate destination [foreign partners and related entities]. Diversion, retransfer, disclosure, or use contrary to applications specified in NASA/NOAA agreement without prior U.S. authorization are prohibited.

1.1.2 EAR Technical Data:

The unclassified technical information included is controlled under the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR), 15 CFR 730-744, ECCN [XXXXX] by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Transfer of this information to a foreign person or entity requires an export

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

license issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce or an EAR exception to the license requirement prior to the export of transfer.

These items are licensed by the United States for ultimate destination [foreign partner and related entities]. Diversion, retransfer, disclosure, or use contrary to applications specified in NASA/NOAA agreement without prior U.S. authorization are prohibited.

1.2 Proprietary Data

Some of the content of documents may be of a proprietary nature to the document preparing/sending Party. In the event data is deemed to be proprietary, and for which protection is to be maintained, the sending Party shall mark the document with a notice to indicate that the data therein is proprietary and shall be used and disclosed by the receiving Party and its related entities (e.g., contractors and subcontractors) only for the purposes of fulfilling the receiving Party’s responsibilities under the Joint Polar Satellite System Program, and that the identified and marked technical data shall not be disclosed or retransferred to any other entity without prior written permission of the document preparer. Data improperly marked as proprietary shall be rejected by the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and returned for removal of proprietary markings.

1.3 Prior Submission Deliveries

If new hardware, software, or documentation is developed, procured, designed, fabricated, tested, or processed in a different manner from that of the first SMBA flight instrument effort (obsolescence, corrective actions, modifications, errors, etc.), the Contractor shall deliver the data item as required with the necessary updates for Government acceptance.

1.4 Due Dates – Related Definitions

The following definitions apply to the "DUE DATE, MATURITY" column in Table 1. Unless otherwise specified, deadlines are in calendar days.

(a) DUE DATE:

(1) IOC: Initial Operating Capability

(2) dCDR, PER, etc: Delta Critical Design Review (dCDR), Pre-Environmental Review (PER), Pre-Ship Review (PSR), etc. (all major reviews). Electronic distribution to be delivered to the Government 5 working days prior to review, unless otherwise stated.

(3) Monthly: Submitted on monthly basis

(4) T: Launch Date

(5) DACA/(D): (Calendar) Days After Contract Award/(Definitization)

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

(6) JCT#: Joint Compatibility Test. Several JCTs are planned (reference the SOW), the number indicates for which JCT the deliverable is required (JCT#1 is the first JCT, JCT#2 is the second, etc.

(7) MR: Mission Rehearsal. Several MRs are planned (reference the SOW), the number indicates for which JCT the deliverable is required (MR#1 is the first MR, MR#2 is the second, etc.)

(8) FQT: Formal Qualification Test

(9) ATP: Authority to Proceed with the contractual effort (definitization or award of letter contract whichever is earlier)

(10) SCCDR: Spacecraft CDR

(11) SCPSR: Spacecraft PSR

(b) MATURITY:

(1) Initial: The first submission of an item, which shall be revised and resubmitted at a later date.

(2) Preliminary/Prelim: An early submission of an item. To be completed as is practicable at the time of preparation. Preliminary submittals are written with the best available current information and are resubmitted when further information becomes available.

(3) Final: The complete, thorough submission of an item for approval, review, or information that, to the best of the Contractor’s knowledge and intention, will not require further revision or updates. However, this does not preclude updating if later found to be necessary. Any updates shall require the same "approval/review" process as was required for the original submissions.

(4) Current: The delivery is written with the best up-to-date information available at the time.

(5) Update: The delivery is revised with the best up-to-date information available at the time.

Other entries in the "DUE DATE” and “MATURITY" columns are self-explanatory.

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

1.5 Media – Related Definitions

The following definition applies to the deliverables in Table 1.

H – Hardcopy(s) of this documentation shall be delivered to the Contracting Officer, Data Manager (DM), and COR at GSFC Code 470.

E - Data items shall be delivered in electronic format to a GSFC LEO specified web portal unless otherwise noted in Table 1. Quantities refer to hardcopies, not electronic copies. The Contracting Officer shall be notified of electronic submission of the deliverable in writing.

Electronic deliverables shall be delivered in the following formats unless otherwise approved by the government:

Text Documents: PDF (searchable) or MSWord Presentations: PDF (searchable) or PowerPoint Spreadsheets: Microsoft Excel Database: Delimited ASCII files accompanied with database schema document defining tables and entries.

Schedules: PDF and MS Project Schematics and Drawings: Design Web Format (DWF) and PDF Photographs: JPEG or current industry standard.

Video: Any readily available open standard (e.g., AVI, MPEG)

Test Measurement Data Delimited ASCII format or other acceptable format

R – For Reviews, hardcopies shall be made available at the review site for government representatives. This will be in addition to electronic copies being made available prior to the review. The quantity specifies the number of hardcopies to be available at the review.

If separate distribution instructions are not specified for separate submission due date/maturity items, then the listed distribution applies to all submissions.

1.6 Category – Related Definitions

The following definitions apply to "Submission Category (CAT)" column in Table 1. If separate approval instructions are not specified for separate submission due date/maturity items, then the listed approval instruction applies to all submissions.

A Approval: CDRL items in this category require approval by the GSFC COR or Contracting

Officer prior to use by the Contractor. Receipt by the Government shall occur within the time specified in the "Due Date" column of Table 1 of this document. Requirements for resubmission shall be as specified by the Contracting Officer. For most cases the Contractor shall be required to resubmit the document within 14 calendar days of receiving comments from the Government. If the Contractor has not received response from GSFC within 30 calendar days of delivery of a CDRL item, the Contractor may proceed as if the document has been approved.

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

R Review. Documents in this category require delivery to the Government prior to use and within the time period specified in the "Due Date" column of Table 1 of this document. They are subject to evaluation by the Government or its designated representatives to determine Contractor effectiveness in meeting contract objectives. Upon submission, the Contractor may proceed with associated work while the Government reviews the submission.

I Information. Data in this category shall be delivered to the Government within the time period specified in the “Due Date” column of Table 1 for the purpose of determining current program status, progress, and future planning requirements.

1.7 Applicability

The following definitions apply to "Applicability (APPLIC)" column in Table 1.

ETU - Applies to the Engineering Test Unit (ETU)

FM1 - Applies to the first flight model

FM1-9 - Applies to all nine flight models

UAR FM2-9 - Update as required for all flight models but the first flight model

1.8 Updates

All CDRLs shall be updated as required (UAR). The Contractor shall notify the Government of any pending updates and re-deliver the CDRL on a schedule agreed to by the Government, Table 1 does not specify this repetitious requirement, however UAR is required for each CDRL.

1.9 Documentation Change Procedures

Unless otherwise defined in the SOW or contract:

a. When a minor correction/change is needed or has been made to a few parts of a “Final” version of a CDRL item that has already been delivered to the Government, the Contractor shall issue within 30 days a Documentation Change Notice starting with the number 001.

Change bars or “change tracking” shall be used to indicate the locations of changes unless the particular file type does not have those features available. If not available, the details of the changes will be described in a text file.

b. When a major correction/change is needed or has been made to all or multiple parts of a “Final” version of a CDRL item that has already been delivered to the Government, the Contractor shall deliver within 30 days a complete revision of the CDRL item. A description of all changes incorporated into the new revision shall be included in the new document or otherwise documented. No change bars are used when a document is updated by revision, and the Documentation Change Notice numbers for that document shall be automatically recycled to 001.

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

1.10 Delivery Instructions

a. The Contractor shall deliver each CDRL item via the media indicated in accordance with the schedule and any special instructions indicated in Table 1 and/or the corresponding DID, and in accordance with the contract or SOW requirements and provisions.

b. All CDRL items shall be delivered electronically (one electronic copy for each CDRL item) to an electronic library designated by the Government. If all or a portion of a CDRL item is not well suited for electronic delivery, the item may be delivered via hard copy upon mutual agreement between the Contractor and the Government.

With each prior delivery submission, the Contractor shall include a cover letter with the following information:

• CDRL #

• Title

• Due Date

• Flight Model

• Original Submission Date • Prior Delivery CDRL #

• Current Submission Revision

• Current Submission Revision Date

The Contractor may deliver a single letter for multiple submissions as long as the information above is contained the letter for each deliverable item.

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

Table 1. Contract Deliverable Items List (CDRL)

No. CALIBRATION/VALIDATION DUE DATE APPLIC CCAT CV-1 Calibration/Validation Plan

• Draft: PDR

• Update: CDR

• Final: PDR-60 days

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

I R A

CV-1a Intercalibration Plan

• Final: PDR-60 days

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

A A

CV-2 Calibration/Validation Procedures • Draft: 60 days prior to use

• Final: 10 days prior to use On-orbit Procedures

• Final: L-90 days

ETU, FM1,

UAR FM2-9

R R R

CV-2a Intercalibration Procedures • Draft: 60 days prior to use

• Final: 10 days prior to use On-orbit Procedures

• Final: L-90 days

ETU, FM1,

UAR FM2-9

R R R

CV-3 Calibration/Validation Reports and Summaries

• Electronic Data: 3 days post-test

• Test Report: 10 days post-test

• Analyses: At completion + 10 days, NLT PSR

• Pre-Ship Summary: PSR

• Post-Launch Summary: IOC + 3 months

ETU & FM1-9 I

R R R R

CV-3a Intercalibration Reports and Summaries

• Electronic Data: 3 days post-test

• Test Report: 10 days post-test

• Analyses: At completion + 10 days, NLT PSR

• Pre-Ship Summary: PSR

• Post-Launch Summary: IOC + 3 months

ETU & FM1-9 I

R R R R

NEON SMBA CDRL 470-SMBA-00439, Revision DRAFT

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. CALIBRATION/VALIDATION DUE DATE APPLIC CCAT CV-4 Radiometric Math Model / Sensor

Performance Math Model

(SPMM)

• Final: CDR

ETU, FM1,

UAR FM2-9

CV-5 Calibration Data Book • PSR ETU & FM1-9 A CV-5a Intercalibration Data Book • PSR ETU & FM1-9 A

CV-6

Calibration Parameters and Report

• Final: PSR

ETU & FM1-9 A

CV-6a

Intercalibration Parameters and Report

• Final: PSR ETU & FM1-9 A

CV-7 Calibration and Data Processing Algorithms

• Final: PSR ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

I I

CV-7a Intercalibration and Data Processing Algorithms

• Final: PSR ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

I I

CV-8 Reserved CV-9 Instrument Data Sets • Final: With EIDP ETU & FM1-9 I

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. ETU DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

ETU-1 ETU Development and Test Plan • 90 DACA ETU I

ETU-2 ETU Requirements Compliance Matrix • Draft: 90 DACA

• Update: ETU Pre-Build Review -60 days

• Finals: ETU Summary Review -30days

ETU R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. INTEGRATION AND TEST DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

IT-1 Instrument Integration, Test and Verification Plan

• Final: MRR ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

A

IT-2 Test Reports • Final: 10 days after test completion ETU &

FM1-9

IT-3 Detailed Test Procedures

• Final: 10 days prior to test

Launch site-specific Test Procedures

• Draft: LRD – 12 months

• Final: LRD – 3 months (i.e., S/C PSR)

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

IT-4 Packaging, Handling, Storage, and Transportation (PHS&T) Plan and Procedures

• Final: MRR

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

IT-5 As-Run Test Procedures • Final: Conclusion of each test ETU &

FM1-9

R

IT-6 End Item Data Package for Instrument • Final: PSR ETU &

FM1-9

A

IT-7 Test Tailoring Plan • Initial: PDR

• Final: CDR

ETU &

FM1-9

IT-8 End Item Data Packages for Major Subsystems and Components

• Final: Receipt from subcontractors + 30 days ETU &

FM1-9

I

IT-9 Instrument Post Delivery Support (PDS) Document

• Rev-A: SMBA Instrument PSR minus 30 days ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R

• Rev-B: SMBA Satellite PER minus 60 days R

• Rev-C: SMBA Satellite PSR plus 3 months minus 60 days

Rev-D: SMBA Satellite Launch plus 60 days R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. MISSION ASSURANCE DUE DATE

APPLIC CAT

MA-1 IMAR Compliance Matrix • Final: with Proposal

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

A A

MA-2 Quality Manual • Final: 30 DACA

• Updates: revisions within 30 days of release

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-3 Reporting of MRB Actions • Major MRB actions: MRB action + 5 days R

• Minor MRB actions: MRB action + 5 days

• Status Overview of MRB actions: Monthly

ETU &

FM1-9

R I

MA-4 Request for a Waiver • Final: Identification + 30 days ETU &

FM1-9

A

MA-5 Anomaly Report • Initial: 24 hours of occurrence

• Update: Notice of a change in status within 24 hours of occurrence

• Update: Proposed closure to the project office prior to closure

• Monthly: overview of Anomaly Reports

ETU &

FM1-9

I

MA-6 System Safety Program Plan • Final: 30 DACA ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

A

MA-7 Hazardous Procedures for Payload I&T and Pre-launch Processing

Payload I&T Hazardous Procedures

• Final: 7 days before first use

Preliminary Launch Range Hazardous Procedures

• Final: 60 days prior to first use

• Final Launch Range Hazardous Procedures

• Final to Range Safety: 45 days prior to first use

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

MA-8 Safety Requirements Compliance Checklist

• Final: 90 DACA ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

A

MA-9 Preliminary Hazard Analysis • Prelim: Submit with CDRL MA-13

• Final: Submit with CDRL MA-13

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

A A A

MA-10 Operations Hazard Analysis • Initial: CDR

• Updates: MRR & TRRs

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

A A

MA-11 Safety Hazard Analysis on Critical Lift Equipment

• Final: MRR ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

A

MA-12 DELETED

MA-13 Instrument Safety Assessment Report • Preliminary: 90 DACA

• Final: PSR - 75 days

ETU &

FM1-9

A A

MA-14 Verification Tracking Log Hazard controls not verified as closed with MA-13

• Regular updates provided until all hazard controls are verified as closed

ETU &

FM1-9

R

MA-15 Safety Waiver • Final: Identification + 30 days ETU &

FM1-9

A

MA-16 Pre-Mishap Plan • Final: 90 DACA

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-17 DELETED

MA-18 DELETED

MA-19 DELETED

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

MA-20 DELETED

MA-21 Reliability Program Plan Plan

• Initial: 90 DACA

• UAR

Activity reports

• Update: Monthly (with PMR)

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

MA-22 Failure Mode and Effects Analysis and Critical Items List

• Initial: 90 DACA

• Update: 60 days prior to PDR

• Update: 60 days prior to CDR

• Update: 60 days prior to PSR

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-23 Fault Tree Analysis • Initial: 90 DACA

• Update: 60days prior to PDR

• Update: 60 days prior to CDR

• Update: 60 days prior to PSR

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-24 Parts Stress Analysis • Final: 90 DACA

• UAR, within 30 days of change

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-25 Worst Case Circuit Analysis • Final: 90 DACA

• UAR, within 30 days of change

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-26 Reliability Assessments and Predictions

• Final: 90 DACA

• UAR, within 30 days of change

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-27 Limited-Life Items List • Final: 90 DACA

• UAR, within 30 days of change

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

MA-28 Software Assurance Plan • Final: 90 DACA

• UAR, 15 days prior to implementation

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-29 Software Status Report • Monthly: as required beginning 60 DACA ETU &

FM1-9

I

MA-30 GSE Assurance Plan • Initial: 180 DACA

• Final: CDR

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-31 DELETED

MA-32 ESD Control Plan • Final: 90 DACA

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-33 Parts Control Plan • Final: 90 DACA

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-34 Parts Control Board • Final: 90 DACA

• UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

MA-35 Parts Identification List • Initial: PDR

• Final: CDR

• UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

MA-36 Project approved Parts List • Final: CDR – 60 days

• UAR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-37 As Designed Parts List • Initial: PDR

• Final: CDR

• UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

MA-38 As Built Parts List • Final: PSR ETU

FM1-9

R

MA-39 Materials & Processes Selection, Control, & Implementation Plan

• Final: 90 DACA ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-40 Life Test Plan for Lubricated Mechanisms

Plan

• Final: 120 DACA Report

• Acceptance test completion + 30 days

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

MA-41 Materials Usage Agreement • Final: 120 DACA

• Update: Change identification + 30 days

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

MA-42 Materials Identification and Usage List

• Final: 120 DACA

• Update: Identification + 30 days

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

MA-43 Nondestructive Evaluation Plan • Final: 90 DACA

• Update: Identification + 30 days

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

A A

MA-44 Printed Wiring Board Test Coupons Coupons and Documentation

• To GSFC or GSFC approved lab as soon as practicable

• When GSFC approved lab is used; results to

GSFC as soon as practical

ETU &

MA-45 GIDEP Alert and NASA Advisory Dispositions

• Disposition of Alerts within 30 days of identification of potential use or use of a EEE part or material

R

MA-46 Significant Parts, Materials, and Safety Problems

• Final: Identification + 30 days ETU &

FM1-9

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

MA-47 DELETED

MA-48 Compliance of Previously Developed Product

• Final: 45days prior to use ETU &

FM1-9

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. ON ORBIT DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

OO-1 Instrument On-Orbit Commissioning Plan

• Final: OTD – 30 days

FM1,

OO-2 Instrument User’s Manual

• Final: OTD – 30 days

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

OO-3 Commissioning Report • Prelim: 10 Days after each test

• Test Results: OHR (L+ 80 days)

• Final: OHR+30

FM1-9 R

R

R R

OO-4 Reserved OO-5 Reserved OO-6 Command and Telemetry Handbook

(see OO-11) Volumes 1 and 2

• Final: OTD – 6 months

ETU,

FM1,

OO-7 Reserved OO-8 Instrument Recommended Operating

Procedures (ROPs)

• Final: OTD – 30 days ETU, FM1, OO-9 Instrument and Simulator Training Materials

• Final: OTD – 30 days ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R R

OO-10 Instrument Constraints, Restrictions, and Warnings/Alerts Document

• Final: OTD – 30 days ETU, FM1, Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. ON ORBIT DUE DATE APPLIC CAT OO-11 Instrument Command and Telemetry

Database

• Final: OTD – 6 months ETU, FM1, OO-12 Instrument Mission Data Definitions • Final: OTD – 30 days

ETU,

FM1,

OO-13

Reserved

OO-14 Command and Telemetry Database (CTDB) Validation Plan

ETU,

FM1,

OO-15 SMBA Memory Table Baseline Content

• Final: OTD – 30 days

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. MANAGEMENT DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

PM-1 Monthly Project Management Reviews

(PMR)

• Monthly at review ETU &

FM1-9

I

PM-2 Reserved PM-3 Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and

Dictionary

• Final: 30 DACA

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

PM-4 Reserved PM-5 Reserved PM-6 Engineering Peer Review Plan • Initial: with Proposal

• Final: 60 DACA

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

I R R

PM-7 Reserved PM-8 Integrated Program Management Report • Initial: Draft Integrated Master Schedule with

Proposal

• Draft Baseline: 45 DACA

• Baseline: 12th working day of the 3rd fiscal month after contract definitization

• Monthly financials: by the 12th working day following the close of the prior month accounting period

• Monthly IMS snapshot no later than the 5th working day of the month

ETU &

FM1-9

PM-9 Manufacturing (Fabrication and Assembly) Flow Plan

• Initial: MRR-30days ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

A A

PM-10 Hardware and Software Configuration Management Plan

• Final: 90 DACA ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. MANAGEMENT DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

PM-11 Project Management Plan • Draft: 45 DACA

• Final: IBR

R R

PM-12 Risk Management Plan • Final: 60 DACA R PM-13 Reserved PM-14 Reserved PM-15 Reserved PM-16 Giver/Receivers/Hand-offs/Receiveables-Deliverables (Rec- Dels)

• Monthly with the IMS ETU &

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. REVIEWS DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

RE-1 System Requirements Review (SRR) / System Definition Review (SDR) Data Package

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

I

RE-2 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Data Package

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

I

RE-3 Critical Design Review (CDR) Data Package

• Draft: 1 day prior to dry run

• Final: 5 days prior to review / hardcopies at

Review

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

I I I

RE-4 Pre-Environmental Review (PER) Data Package

• Draft: 1 day prior to dry run

• Final: 5 days prior to review / hardcopies at

Review

FM1-9 I

I

RE-5 Pre-Ship Review (PSR) Data Package

• Draft: 1 day prior to dry run

• Final: 5 days prior to review / hardcopies at

Review

ETU &

FM1-9

I I I

RE-6 Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) • Draft: 1 day prior to dry run

• Final: 5 days prior to review / hardcopies at

Review

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

I I

RE-7 Engineering Peer Review Data Packages

• EPR Meeting Material : EPR – 3 days

• Final: Hard copies at review

ETU &

FM1-9

I I

RE-8 Manufacturing Readiness Review Package

• Draft: 5 days prior to dry run

• Final: 5 days prior to review / hardcopies at

Review

ETU &

FM1-9

I I

RE-9 Design Modification Review

(DMR)

• As needed ETU &

FM1-9

I

RE-10 Firmware Design Data Package • Final: CDR

• Update: Firmware Review - 10 days

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

I I

RE-11 Reserved RE-12 Test Readiness Review (TRR) Data

Package

• Final: 5 days prior to review / hardcopies at Review

ETU &

FM1-9

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. REVIEWS DUE DATE APPLIC CAT RE-13 Reserved •

RE-14 ETU Pre-Build Review Package • ETU I

RE-15 ETU Test Summary Review Package

• ETU I

RE-16 Inputs to Higher Level Reviews • Draft: 1 day prior to dry run

• Final: 5 days prior to review / hardcopies at

Review

ETU &

FM1-9

I

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

SE-1 Engineering Change Requests ▪ Class I: As Generated

▪ Class II: As Generated

ETU &

FM1-9

A I

SE-2 Reserved SE-3 Trend Plan/Analysis, Reports, and

Operations Log

▪ Initial: PDR

▪ Update: PER

▪ Final: PSR

ETU &

FM1-9

R R R

SE-4 Reserved SE-5 Engineering Drawings ▪ Final: As generated / UAR ETU &

FM1-9

I

SE-6 System Performance Verification Plan and Requirement Verification Matrix

▪ Initial: SRR-60 days

▪ Final: PER - 21 days

▪ Update: PSR

ETU &

FM1-9

A A A

SE-7 Verification Reports ▪ Final: Verification Test + 30 days ETU &

FM1-9

R

SE-8 Configuration Item Identification List and Computer Software Configuration Items

▪ Final: MRR

ETU, FM1,

UAR FM2-

I I

SE-9 Instrument Performance Specification ▪ Initial: SRR-60 days

▪ Final:

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

SE-10 Reserved SE-11 Functional and Physical Configuration

Audits

▪ Final: As Required for each audit ETU &

FM1-9

A

SE-12 Analysis and Modeling ETU &

FM1-9

R

SE-12a Structural and Mechanical Analysis and Models

▪ Final: MRR

▪ Correlated Model: PSR – 30 days

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

SE-12b Thermal Analysis and Models • Instrument DTM 1: CDR – 60

• Instrument RTM 1: SC CDR – 90 days

• Instrument DTM 2 + TVAC GSE: 90 days before PER

• Correlated As-tested instrument DTM 3 +

TVAC GSE: 90 days after instrument TVAC thermal balances

• Correlated instrument DTM 4: PSR – 40 days Flight Cases Launch/Ascent/Deploy Science calibration maneuvers

• Correlated instrument RTM 2: PSR-20 days

If model deliveries per this schedule are not achievable due to the data analysis schedule, the Contractor shall coordinate with the COR to agree on acceptable delivery dates.

ETU &

FM1-9

R

SE-12c Stress Analysis • Final: MRR

• Update: PSR – 30 days

• UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

SE-12d Radio Frequency Interference Detection Capability Analysis

• Final: MRR

• Update: PSR – 30 days

UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

SE-12e Hyperspectral Capability Analysis • Final: MRR

• Update: PSR – 30 days

UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

SE-12f Reserved SE-12g EMI/EMC Analysis Report • Final: MRR

• Update: PSR – 30 days

• UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

SE-12h Hardness & Survivability Analysis • Final: MRR

• Update: PSR – 30 days

• UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

SE-12i Reserved SE-12j Shock Analysis • Final: MRR

• Update: PSR – 30 days with correlated model

• UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

SE-12k Reserved SE-12l Reserved SE-12m Reserved SE-12n Reserved SE-12o Reserved SE-12p Reserved SE-12q Contamination Analysis Report • Initial: CDR

• Final: PER

• Update: PSR – 30 days, correlated model, ETU &

FM1-9

R R

SE-12r On-Orbit Pointing & Jitter Analysis • Initial: PDR

• Final: CDR

• Update: PSR – 30 days, correlated model, UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R R

SE-13 Specification Tree • Final: 90 DACA

• UAR

ETU, FM1,

UAR FM2-

R R

SE-14 Instrument Concept of Operations Document • Final: 120 DACA

• UAR

ETU, FM1,

UAR FM2-

R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

SE-15 Contamination Control Plan (CCP) and Data Plan

• Final: 180 DACA Thermal Vacuum Bakeout Results Final: Within thirty (30) of completion

Contamination Certificate of Compliance

• Final: With End Item Data Package

SE-16 Instrument to Spacecraft Interface Control

Document (ICD)

• Initial: PDR

• Final: CDR

ETU, FM1,

UAR FM2-

SE-17 Instrument to Spacecraft Mechanical Interface Control Document (MICD)

• Initial: PDR

• Final: CDR

ETU, FM1,

UAR FM2-

SE-18 DELETED

SE-19 Spare Parts Plan and List • Final: with proposal ETU, FM1, UAR FM2-

R

SE-20 Reserved SE-21 Instrument Simulator Specification Final: CDR FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R R

SE-22 Reserved SE-23 Instrument Simulator Interface Verification

Report Final: Test + 30 days FM1, UAR

FM2-9

A

SE-24 Reserved SE-25 Reserved SE-26 Instrument Performance Margin Analyses • Initial: PDR

Final: CDR

UAR

ETU &

FM1-9

R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

SE-27 Mass Properties Report PSR

UAR

ETU &

SE-28 Systems Engineering Management Plan

(SEMP)

Final: 90 DACA 1

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. SOFTWARE DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

SW-1 NPR 7150.2a Tailored Compliance Matrix

• Final: 30 DACA

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R

SW-2 Sensor Software Development Plan

• Final: 30 DACA ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R

SW-3 Software Configuration Management Plan

• Final: 30 DACA ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R R

SW-4 Sensor Software Requirements Specification

• Final: 30 DACA FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R R

SW-5 Sensor Software Detailed Design Document

• Final: 30 DACA ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R R

SW-6 Sensor Flight Software Test Plan

• Final: 60 DACA ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R R

SW-7 Sensor Flight Software Test Descriptions

• Final: SWTRR – 60 days ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

R R

SW-8 Sensor Flight Software Test Procedures

• Initial: SWTRR - 15 days

• Final: Software Acceptance Review (SWAR) - 15 days

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

SW-9 Sensor Flight Software

Test Reports

• Final: 30 days after test completion ETU &

FM1-9

R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. SOFTWARE DUE DATE APPLIC CAT SW-10 Sensor Flight Software

Version Description Document

• Final: 30 days after acceptance test completion ETU &

FM1-9

R R

SW-11 Sensor Software Development Facility Specification

• Final: 60 DACA ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

I I

SW-12 Sensor Software Maintenance Plan

• Final: 30 DACA ETU, FM1, UAR

FM2-9

I

SW-13 Sensor Flight Software User's Guide

• Prelim: each SW Release – 30 days

• Final: PSR

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

R R R

SW-14 Sensor Simulator Software Requirements Specification

• Final: 90 DACA Simulator R R

SW-

14FSTB

Flight Software Testbench Requirements Specification

• Final: 60 DACA FSTB R R

SW-15 Sensor Simulator Software Detailed Design Document

• Final: 120 DACA Simulator R R

SW-

15FSTB

Flight Software Testbench Detailed Design Document

• Final: FSTB Design Review – 30 days FSTB R R

SW-16 Sensor Simulator Software Test Plan

• Final: 120 DACA Simulator R R

SW-

16FSTB

Flight Software Testbench Test Plan

• Final: FSTB TRR – 30 days FSTB R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. SOFTWARE DUE DATE APPLIC CAT SW-17 Sensor Simulator

Software Test Descriptions

• Final: Simulator TRR – 3 weeks Simulator R R

SW-18 Sensor Simulator Software Test Procedures

• Final: Simulator TRR – 3 weeks Simulator R R

SW-19 Sensor Simulator Software Test Reports

• Final: Test Completion + 30 days Simulator R R

SW-

19FSTB

Flight Software Testbench Test Reports

• Final: Test Completion + 30 days FSTB R R

SW-20 Sensor Simulator Software Version Description Document

• Final: Simulator Software Acceptance Review – 5 days Simulator R R

SW-

20FSTB

Flight Software Testbench Version Description Document

• Final: FSTB TRR – 30 days FSTB R R

SW-21 Sensor Simulator Software User's Guide

• Final: Simulator TRR Simulator R R

SW-

21FSTB

Flight Software Testbench User's Guide

Final: Test Completion + 30 days FSTB R R

SW-22 Software Test Readiness Review Data Package

• Final: SWTRR – 5 days ETU &

FM1-9

R R

SW-

22FSTB

Flight Software Testbench Test Readiness Review Data Package

• Final: FSTB TRR – 5 days FSTB R R

SW-23 Software Acceptance Review Data Package

Final: 15 days after test completion ETU &

FM1-9

R

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

No. SOFTWARE DUE DATE APPLIC CAT

SW-

23FSTB

Flight Software Testbench Acceptance Review Data Package

Final: 15 days after test completion FSTB R R

SW-24 Sensor Data Sets • Final: UAR ETU &

FM1-9

R

SW-25 Flight Software Development Environment

Initial: 30 days after Software CDR (or equivalent flight software maturity)

Final: PSR – 30 days

ETU,

FM1,

UAR

FM2-9

I I

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

2 DATA ITEM DESCRIPTIONS

2.1 Calibration/Validation Data Items

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

1. CDRL No.: 2. Title:

CV-1 CALIBRATION/VALIDATION PLAN

3. Reference:

SOW 5.3.2

4. Use:

Controlling document for definition of calibration methods and equipment. To document tests to be conducted for calibrating the radiometric response of the Instrument.

5. Preparation Information:

The Contractor shall work with the Government’s Sensor Data Records Team to develop a Calibration/Validation Plan that describes the approach for calibrating, characterizing, and validating the spectral, spatial, radiometric, and geometric performance of the SMBA, thereby ensuring that the Instrument will satisfy the Instrument Performance Requirements Document.

The Calibration and Validation Plan shall address all requirements and tests. This document shall include On-Orbit calibration and validation requirements and references to the operations documents that describe these calibration and validation procedures. The Contractor’s comprehensive radiometric/geometric calibration plan shall include preliminary work at subsystem levels of assembly as well as at the system level.

The Calibration/Validation Plan shall incorporate the following information at a minimum:

A. A description of planned tests and analyses including:

(a) what is being tested or analyzed and how it relates to instrument performance

(b) the expected test or analysis results

(c) integration level for test or analysis model, i.e., part, subassembly, assembly, instrument

(d) environmental conditions for test, e.g. ambient, thermal-vacuum, on-orbit

(e) sampling methods and their statistical validity

(f) operational phase of testing, i.e., pre-launch, or commissioning

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

(g) theoretical basis for the test or analysis, i.e., how the test is performed, how the data are reduced and the method rationale supported by fundamental physics principles and equations)

(h) the resolution, precision and accuracy of the results and relation to the expected results

(i) test configuration, i.e., equipment, test equipment calibration, and test setup

(j) description of test or analysis results usage, i.e. processing algorithms that use test or analysis results or calibration parameters generated by the test or analysis B. A test and analysis schedule and flow chart C. How test/analysis results are made available D. Government access and participation in pre-launch testing including a Government-owned standards or Government-performed cal/val-related characterization activities E. Description of COTS and custom analysis tools F. A description of the On-Orbit Calibration capabilities of the SMBA, including their design, characterization techniques, and operational implementation. This shall include a description of any necessary calibration data that must be collected during normal operations.

G. Reference Standards and their calibration traceability H. Support data requirements I. Tests to be conducted for calibrating the radiometric response of the Instrument

Given known issues with diffuser materials on other NASA missions being contaminated in manufacturing or in pre-launch testing, the Contractor shall ensure the Instrument Calibration/Validation Plan also includes a description of diffuser contamination management activities and characterizations including:

a. Vacuum bakes

b. Use of witness samples

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

CV-2 CALIBRATION/VALIDATION PROCEDURES

To verify that the planned procedures meet the goals of the Calibration/Validation Plan.

1. For each test in the Calibration/Validation Plan, the Calibration/Validation procedure for each test shall include:

a. Test Objectives

b. Test Methods

c. Assumptions

d. Applicable Documents and Software

e. Associated algorithms

f. Required Instrument Configuration, including any differences between pre-flight and flight configurations

g. Mechanical and Electrical Test Equipment Configuration, including layout and interconnection of test equipment and articles including the grounding scheme. Location and identification of all measuring points on appropriate schematics and diagrams

h. Test Equipment Identification

i. Test Instrumentation

j. Calibration reference requirements

k. Safety Provisions and Cautions, including Identification of hazardous and potentially hazardous situations and operations and abort conditions

l. Environmental and/or other conditions to be maintained, including contamination controls

m. Personnel responsibilities and chain-of-command for test performance

n. Expected results in telemetry and associated caution and warning levels.

o. Program Quality Requirements

p. Stimuli sources and associated and associated levels

q. Test durations

r. Test configurations

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

s. Sequence of events

t. Trending of performance characteristics during verification testing

u. Step-by-step instructions

v. Data Recording/Output Format Requirements

w. Data Recording Forms and Tables

x. Analysis techniques

y. Expected results

z. Pass/Fail Criteria

aa. Test Termination Procedure

2. For each Analysis in the Calibration/Validation Plan, the procedure for each Analysis shall include:

a. Analysis Objectives, i.e. short description of the item or items being validated by this analysis

b. Analysis Methods including the analysis level of depth (i.e. 1st order, 2nd order, etc…)

c. Assumptions

d. Applicable Documents and Software

e. Associated algorithms and software tools

f. Required analysis mode/model configuration(s)

g. List of input data that will be used and related test IDs that were used to acquire the data

h. List of external reference sources of input data and/or model used in analysis

i. List of fixed analysis parameters and set points

j. List of adjustable analysis parameters and set points that may vary between runs.

k. Equipment requirements

l. Program Quality Requirements

m. Sequence of events

n. Step-by-step description of the data analysis procedure/algorithm

o. Description of any statistical sampling method being used

p. Data Recording/Output Format Requirements

q. Data Recording Forms and Tables

r. Expected results

s. Pass/Fail Criteria

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

CV-3 CALIBRATION/VALIDATION REPORTS AND

SUMMARIES

To provide results of individual calibration/validation tests and analyses for Government review.

To provide summaries at a higher level to serve as instrument calibration references for current and future users of the SMBA data set.

The Contractor shall provide a Calibration/Validation Report for each calibration or validation test or analysis. All supporting data shall be provided in electronic format, where applicable.

The Calibration/Validation Reports shall include at a minimum:

A. Identification of article or component tested or being validated with date of test or related analysis and the relevant Test/Analysis ID and run number

B. Performance trends during and between each planned test C. List of uncertainty levels for each input data in analysis or test measurements D. If a given test or analysis has more than one configuration state the test or analysis configuration selected.

E. Problems or failures with tests, procedures, or analyses F. Anomalies and deviations from plans or procedures and their resolution/status G. Test or analysis results, including:

a. any calibration parameters to be used for on-orbit processing

b. comparison of results with expectations and requirements

c. interpretation of the results

The Calibration/Validation Summary Report shall be delivered in two phases. The Pre-Ship report shall describe the pre-ship calibration process and results. The Post-Launch Report shall describe the calibration process and results from the commissioning phase. Each shall document the state of the instrument calibration relative to the Instrument Performance Requirements Document. The reports shall include details of any anomalies affecting the data, descriptions of

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

the instrument calibration and characterization tests, references to previous test reports and analyses, and long term trending results. The Post-Launch Report shall include any changes made to the calibration parameters and algorithms during the Commissioning period and the justification for these changes.

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

CV-4 RADIOMETRIC MATH MODEL (RMM)/

SENSOR PERFORMANCE MATH MODEL

(SPMM)

SOW 2.4.1

For evaluating the end-to-end radiometric performance of the instrument, allocation of error budget, etc.

A. The Radiometric Math Model shall be used to: evaluate the end-to-end radiometric performance of the Instrument (Photons to calibrated radiance or brightness temperature);

conduct sensitivity analyses; determine absolute and relative calibration accuracies;

identify error contributors which can be eliminated or mitigated during the design phase;

identify impact of error budget trades; assess instrument performance in terms of Noise Figure (NF), Noise Equivalent Delta Temperature (NE∆T), stability in orbit, etc.

B. The model shall incorporate actual test and calibration data; the model shall be updated and refined during the course of the Instrument development program until it simulates instrument performance within the accuracy required by the specifications.

C. The model shall include on-board and preflight ground laboratory calibration algorithms and a data book that contains all pertinent estimated measured data required by the calibration algorithms. The estimated data shall be replaced with measured data when it is available. The on-board calibration algorithms are used along with ground calibration data to demonstrate that the absolute and relative radiometric accuracies are being met.

The calibration data shall also be provided in a mutually agreed upon electronic format.

D. The SPMM shall also propagate uncertainties in model input parameters to uncertainties in model output parameters, including error correlation effects. The basis for uncertainties in SPMM inputs shall be documented. The delivered SPMM shall include full documentation of the model, including the error propagation methodology, and instructions for Government customer use of the model.

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

E. System performance predictions shall include uncertainty estimates for calibrated radiance, reflectance, and equivalent blackbody temperatures based on propagation of uncertainties in SDR algorithm look-up table values and other SDR algorithm parameters.

Check the LEO MIS Server at https://jpssmis.gsfc.nasa.gov/frontmenu_dsp.cfm to verify that this is the correct version prior to use.

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

CV-5 CALIBRATION DATA BOOK

SOW paragraph 5.3.2

For demonstrating specification compliance and for full interpretation of the orbital data.

The calibration data book, which is to be delivered at the end of instrument calibration tests and as part of Pre-Ship Review (PSR) Data Package, are to be a record of all pertinent test and calibration data, including all raw data from which graphs, curves, etc., are prepared, which will be used as an aid in determining the flight worthiness of the instrument.

A summary section shall be prepared, which contains functional equations and charts pertinent to the data contained therein. The summary shall depict, as a minimum, all information pertinent to the performance requirements, the final system level bench test data, the final calibration of the instrument and every instrument subsystem as determined from all tests and…