Category A CIO Project Plans FY19.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted May 3, 2019

Attached to: Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation's Health
Opportunity number: CDC-RFA-OT18-18020201SUPP19
Issued by: Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

About this file

From the source

Category A CIO Project Plans FY19

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Category C CIO Project Plans FY19.pdf	PDF	May 3, 2019
Category B CIO Project Plans FY19.pdf	PDF	May 3, 2019
CDC-RFA-OT18-18020201SUPP19.pdf	PDF	May 3, 2019
CDC-RFA-OT18-18020201SUPP19 Amend 1.pdf	PDF	May 3, 2019
Category C CIO Project Plans FY19.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2019
Category B CIO Project Plans FY19.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2019
Category A CIO Project Plans FY19.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2019
CDC-RFA-OT18-18020201SUPP19.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2019
PKG00250548-instructions.pdf	PDF	Apr 29, 2019

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

CDC-RFA-OT18-18020201SUPP19

FY19 CIO Project Plans

Category A

Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support National Partnership Branch

FY 2019 CIO Project Plan Final

CDC-RFA-OT18-1802

Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through National Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Nation’s Health

Project Plan Instructions

You can edit and save a draft of your plan by clicking the "Save and Close" button below. You can edit your plan at any time before submitting it. You must submit a final version to be considered for the NOFO. Submit the final version by clicking the "Submit" button below. You cannot make edits after you click "Submit."

GENERAL INFORMATION

1 Project Title (Please do not use all caps):* 13/15 words maximum

2 CIO:*

NATIONAL CENTER FOR INJURY PREVENTION AND CONTROL

3 Division, office, or unit:* Division of Violence Prevention

4 CIO Point of Contact (POC) name(s):* CIO POC email address(es):*

Separate multiple names, emails, and phone numbers with a semi-colon. CIO POC phone number(es):*

5 Target Population Category to Receive Capacity-Building Assistance (CBA):* Category A

6 Description of the Target Population:* 4/25 words maximum Note: Proposals should not build capacity for CDC or other federal agencies

PROJECT FUNDING

OT18-1802 Period of Performance Length: August 1, 2018 – July 31, 2023 Budget Period Length: September 1, 2019 – July 31, 2020

Proposed Project Funding Amount:* (11-month budget period)

(Whole numbers only) 8 Expected Length of Project:*

The CIO will award new funding each budget period for the remainder of the period of performance.

The CIO will award new funding each budget period for at least two consecutive years.

The CIO will fund the project for one year.

CBA PROGRAM APPROACH – NOFO LOGIC MODEL

Select the program strategies and the program outcomes the project should work toward for the length of the project.

9 CBA Program Strategies (Check one or more):*

Public Health Systems Infrastructure: Activities to improve operational capacity, such as policies and plans, administration and management, and quality improvement

Leadership and Workforce Development: Activities to improve leadership and workforce competencies, recruitment, and retention

Data and Information Systems: Activities to improve collection, management, interpretation, and dissemination of data to guide decision-making

Communication and Information Technology: Activities to improve use of communication and information technology to affect health decisions and actions

Partnerships: Activities to improve establishment and maintenance of results-driven partnerships

Laws and Policies: Activities to improve the ability to interpret and inform laws, including statutes and regulations, and policies that affect health

Programs and Services: Activities to improve the identification of best practices and the implementation of evidence-based/informed programs and services

10 CBA Program Outcomes (Check one or more):*

Short-Term

Improved operational capacity to evaluate, manage, and improve public health systems

Improved leadership capacity to identify and prioritize public health needs

A pilot project to build capacity for comprehensive state suicide and opioid overdose prevention

State health departments

$2,000,000

Page 1 of 7FY19 Project Plan - A pilot project to build capacity for comprehensive...

4/19/2019https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.com/sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Lists/FY%2019%20Project_...

Strengthened core and discipline-specific public health competencies among the workforce to improve job performance

Improved capacity of data and information systems to conduct public health monitoring and surveillance

Improved communication and information technology capacity to inform the public efficiently and effectively

Improved capacity to establish and maintain partnerships within and across sectors to create a shared vision of health

Increased capacity to evaluate laws and policies to affect health

Improved capacity to identify, prioritize, and customize relevant programs and services to address public health needs

Intermediate

Increased capability of public health systems to achieve nationally established standards

Increased leadership decision-making to address public health needs strategically and systematically

Strengthened capability of public health workforce to deliver essential public health services

Increased capability to use data to inform decision-making and support evidence-based practices and policies

Strengthened capability to use communication and information technology to affect health decisions and actions

Strengthened capability to respond to public health priorities collaboratively and strategically

Strengthened capability to systematically apply and use laws and policies to improve health

Increased capability to implement evidence-based/informed public health programs, policies, and services to address public health needs

PROJECT DETAILS

State the purpose of the project and provide project details for the length of the budget period (11 months).

1. For the selected program strategies, describe proposed activities and provide sample process measures to track progress implementing the activities.

Describe the expected outputs (resources, tools, products, etc.) and outcomes (changes to occur), and provide sample outcome measures to track progress achieving the outcomes.

2. Complete the activities, process measures, outputs, budget period outcomes, and outcome measures column for each program strategy selected.

Project Purpose : * 137/150 words maximum

11 Program Strategies Activities Process Measures Outputs Budget Period Outcomes Outcome Measures

The purpose of the proposed project is two-fold. The recipient will:

• Provide capacity-building assistance (CBA) to one state health department (SDH) with a high burden of suicide and opioid overdose deaths and high readiness for comprehensive action (called Track 1—See section 15). Specifically, the recipient will help strengthen the SHD's capability to carry out essential public health functions related to the planning, implementation, and evaluation of a comprehensive approach to suicide prevention that simultaneously addresses opioid overdoses.

• Work in coordination with the Track 1 state to raise the capacity of two additional SHDs (Track 2), with a high burden of suicide and opioid overdoses and moderate readiness for comprehensive action.

The CBA provided to the 3 state health departments will be used as a case study for future activities designed to build HD capacity to develop comprehensive action.

Public Health Systems Infrastr ucture 1. Secure support for comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention among public health leadership (Tracks 1 & 2).

2. Secure strategic staffing and funding to support sustainable comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention (Tracks 1 & 2).

3. Provide technical assistance in coordination with Track 1 state to support Track 2 states in securing leadership, staffing and funding support needed for comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention.

Improved operational capacity to evaluate, manage, and improve public health systems.

Page 2 of 7FY19 Project Plan - A pilot project to build capacity for comprehensive...

Conversations with leadership scheduled.

Increased support for comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention among state and local public health leaders.

Identify staffing needs for coordinating and carrying out project activities.

Identify funding streams (beyond funding through this pilot project) identified for sustaining comprehensive suicide and opioid overdoes prevention.

Track 1 state and Track 2 states develop a mutually agreed upon technical assistance plan for strengthening public health systems infrastructure.

State and local leaders participate in planning meetings.

State and local leaders receive regular updates on project progress.

State and local leaders participate in planning meetings.

State and local leaders receive regular updates on project progress.

Staff hired and retained to oversee, coordinate, and carry out project activities.

Additional funding streams identified for sustaining comprehensive suicide and opioid overdoes prevention.

Public health systems infrastructure technical assistance plan developed.

Lessons learned and other steps/tips documented for Track 2.

State and local leaders demonstrate endorsement and support for comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention through at least 2 public endorsement activities (e.g.

support stated in presentations/speeches, press releases/media outreach, letters of support to key partners/funders, integration of suicide and opoioid prevention priorities into state strategic plans, etc.) .

Funding secured and/or applied for to sustain staff needed to oversee, coordinate, and carry out comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention past the current funding period.

Lessons learned and other steps/tips documented for Track 2.

Track 2 states secure leadership, staffing, and funding support (as described above).

Lessons learned and other steps/tips documented for all states in the future.

Data and Information Systems

4. Build capacity for improved data and information systems.

5. Test syndromic surveillance for nonfatal suicide and opioid overdoses (Track 1).

6. Assure data systems (not including syndromic surveillance) per data plan above, implemented for collection of morbidity and mortality data related to fatal and nonfatal suicide and opoioid overdoses and related risk and protective factors (Track 1 & 2).

7. Ensure data is used to describe the problem of suicide and opioid overdose in the state, inform and refine prevention action, and track prevention impact (Track 1 & 2).

8. Provide technical assistance and support to Track 2 states in building capacity for improved data and information systems (Track 1).

Develop a comprehensive data systems plan for measuring morbidity, mortality, and risk and protective factors linked to suicide and opioid overdoses.

Technical assistance received for final steps necessary to implement and test syndromic surveillance.

Technical assistance received related to which data systems to use for data collection.

Data systems needed for morbidity, mortality, and related risk and protective factor data identified (e.g.

NVDRS, syndromic surveillance, hospital discharge data, surveys).

Receive technical assistance for development of problem statement and what to include.

Develop a data use and dissemination plan outlining how data will support planning, implementation, and evaluation of comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention.

Track 1 state and Track 2 states develop a mutually agreed upon data technical assistance plan.

Comprehensive data systems plan developed.

Syndromic surveillance system tested and implemented.

Data systems needed for morbidity, mortality, and related risk and protective factor data implemented.

Problem statement completed.

Data use and dissemination plan developed.

Data Technical assistance plan developed.

State demonstrates capacity to collect, edit, manage, and analyze surveillance information from multiple data sources such as death certificates, medical examiner or coroner records, and hospital data.

Improved capacity for using data and information systems to conduct public health monitoring and surveillance.

Increased capability to use data to inform decision-making and support evidence-based practices and policies.

Page 3 of 7FY19 Project Plan - A pilot project to build capacity for comprehensive...

At least one comprehensive data report generated for each local community engaging in the state's comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention approach.

Lessons learned and other steps/tips documented for all states in the future.

Syndromic surveillance reports generated monthly for all local communities participating in comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention activities.

Steps and lessons learned documented and shared with Track 2 states.

At least one data report on all key morbidity, mortality, and related risk and protective factor indicators developed for all local communities participating in comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention activities.

Problem statement included in strategic agenda, implementation, and evaluation plans (see more below).

Data integrated into planning, implementation, and evaluation plans and updated at least once before the end of the project period.

Track 2 states develop data and information systems for comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention (as described above).

Lessons learned developed.

Partnerships

9. Develop and maintain strategic partnerships to implement and sustain comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention (Tracks 1 & 2).

10. Create a shared agenda with goals and objectives (Tracks 1 and 2).

11. Develop and maintain a process for ongoing partner collaboration, communication, and shared learning (Tracks 1 and 2).

12. Provide technical assistance and support to Track 2 states in developing and maintaining strategic partnerships, creating a strategic agenda, and developing/maintaining partner collaboration and communication. (Track 1).

Partners identified at the state and local level that represent multiple sectors (public and private), areas of expertise (including suicide prevention and opioid overdose prevention), and authorities/ responsibilities (including data access/improvement, program implementation, and evaluation).

Partners convene and agree upon a shared agenda, goals, and objectives for comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention (feeds into creation of implementation and evaluation plans outlined under "programs and services" (NOTE: Travel costs for at least 1 representative from each partner group to attend this convening should be reflected in the budget).

State and local partners agree upon a mutually beneficial structure and process for maintaining collaboration, communication, and for sharing lessons learned.

Track 1 state and Track 2 states develop a mutually agreed upon partnership technical assistance plan.

Partner/Coalition member list created.

Shared agenda, goals, and objectives developed.

Communication and shared learning plan developed.

Calendar of regular ongoing meetings created.

Lessons learned documented.

Partnership Technical assistance plan developed.

Improved capacity to establish and maintain partnerships within and across sectors to create a shared vision with goals and objectives achieved.

Partner buy-in and engagement received and maintained.

Strengthened capability to respond to public health priorities collaboratively and strategically.

Strong state and local partnership coordination and engagement. Shared learning drives program responsiveness and improvement.

Improved capacity to establish and maintain partnerships within and across sectors to create a shared vision with goals and objectives achieved.

At least 80% of partners participate in 70% or more of coalition meetings and events.

Shared agenda, goals, and objectives endorsed by all key partners and leaders.

At least 80% of partners participate in 50% or more of coalition meetings and events.

At least 80% of partners indicate that they feel adequately informed of comprehensive suicide and opioid prevention activities occurring across the state.

At least 3 major program improvements result from partner communication and shared learning.

Track 2 states develop and maintaining strategic partnerships, create a strategic agenda, and develop/maintain partner collaboration and communication (as described above).

Lessons learned documented.

Page 4 of 7FY19 Project Plan - A pilot project to build capacity for comprehensive...

ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY AND PROGRAM EXPERIENCE

12 Applicant Organizational Capacity:* 143/200 words maximum

13 Applicant Program Experience:* 165/200 words maximum

COLLABORATIVE WORK

14 Expectations for Collaboration, as applicable: 195/200 words maximum

Program and Services

13. Assess suicide and opioid prevention programming and services in the state and identify gaps (Track 1 & 2).

14. Select multiple strategies for implementation from CDC Suicide Prevention Technical Package (Track 1).

15. Develop an implemention plan for implementing a comprehensive approach to suicide and opioid overdose prevention.

16. Develop an evalaution plan for evaluating a comprehensive approach to suicide and opioid overdose prevention.

17. Provide technical assistance and support to Track 2 states in the development of implementation and evaluation plans for a comprehensive approach to suicide and opioid overdose prevention (Track 1).

Suicide and opioid preventon programming/services assessment conducted.

Partners convene and decide upon which strategies will be prioritized for implementation.

State and local partners engage in a collaborative process to develop a comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention plan (based upon shared agenda mentioned above).

State and local partners engage in a collaborative process to develop an evaluation plan to track implementation, lessons learned, and impact of comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention plan.

Track 1 state and Track 2 states develop a mutually agreed upon technical assistance plan for the development of implementation and evaluation plans.

Suicide and opioid overdose prevention assessment report created with gaps in programs, practices, and policies identified.

Priority strategies for implementation identified.

Comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose implementation prevention plan developed.

Comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose evaluation plan developed.

Implementation and Evaluation technical assistance plan developed.

Improved capacity to identify, prioritize, and customize relevant programs and services to address suicide and opioid overdose prevention.

Increased capability to implement evidence-based/informed public health programs, policies, and services to address public health needs.

Increased capacity to monitor and evaluate implementation, lessons learned, and impact of comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose prevention.

Findings from suicide and opioid overdose prevention assessment report integrated into implementation plan.

Priority strategies for implementation integrated into implementation plan (below).

Partners agree to implement at least 80% of comprehensive suicide and opioid overdose strategic plan activities.

Data sources/systems identified for tracking implementation, lessons learned, and impact of all key strategies and activities listed in implementation plan.

Track 2 states develop implementation and evaluation plans (as described above)

Lessons learned documented.

The recipient should have documented success providing capacity-building assistance in service to strengthening infrastructure and improving performance of state health departments (SHDs) and their abilities to plan, implement, and evaluate statewide comprehensive injury prevention (e.g. suicide and opioid overdose) action. This includes supporting and guiding multi-sectoral partnerships (e.g. vital statistics, youth serving organizations, local health departments, health care providers, academic institutions) and multi-component strategies targeting individual, family/relationship, community, and societal audiences.

More specifically, recipients must have experience providing technical assistance, training, information sharing, and materials development (including documentation and reporting of best practices and lessons learned) as appropriate to improve SHDs’ capacity related to 1) public health systems infrastructure such as operations (e.g. planning), 2) improved collection, management, interpretation, and dissemination of data (e.g. morbidity/mortality surveillance, including syndromic surveillance to guide decision-making, 3) establishment and maintainence of multi-sectoral results-driven partnerships, and

4) selection of multi-component evidence-based strategies and approaches (programs, practices, policies) for implementation and evaluation of comprehensive prevention (e.g. suicide).

The recipient should have experience providing technical assistance, training, and leadership to strengthen and maintain the capacity of state health departments to build multi-sectoral partnerships, plan, implement, and evaluate comprehensive prevention strategies and approaches with a focus on injury prevention, intentional and/or unintentional. Recipient should have an understanding of recent trends in fatal and nonfatal suicide and opioid overdoses.

Knowledge of evidence-based public health strategies and approaches for comprehensive suicide prevention such as those laid out in CDC's, Preventing Suicide: Policy, Programs, and Practices for Suicide Prevention (https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/suicideTechnicalPackage.pdf) and the National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention's, Transforming Communities: Key Elements for Implementation of Comprehensive Community-based Suicide Prevention, https://theactionalliance.org/sites/default/files/transformingcommunitiespaper.pdf is required. Knowledge of CDC's, Connecting the Dots: An Overview of the Links Among Multiple Forms of Violence, https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pub/connecting_dots.html, is necessary. While opioid overdose prevention is not specifically highlighted in this publication, the concept of overlapping risk and protective factors applies. Finally, the recipient should be aware of CDC's work in opioid overdose prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/index.html .

Page 5 of 7FY19 Project Plan - A pilot project to build capacity for comprehensive...

15 Expected Subcontractual Work and Recommended Criteria for Selecting Subcontractors, as applicable: 177/200 words maximum

16 Will the proposed CBA benefit governmental public health agencies?* Yes No

Briefly describe how. : * 157/200 words maximum

BUDGET INSTRUCTIONS

17 General Instructions for Use of Funds, as applicable: 58/100 words maximum

CIO CERTIFICATION

By submitting this project plan, I certify that my CIO currently does not maintain a comparable NOFO related to a CBA. I understand my CIO is responsible for overseeing the Data Management Plans, ensuring adherence to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), and obtaining Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Clearance. I will discuss the project with my Associate Director for Science (ADS) and initiate the appropriate clearance prior to funding.

Final

The proposed project plan and its activities will require several layers of collaboration:

Recipient & 3 SHDs

• The recipient of this funding will subcontract with three SHDs to enhance their capability for planning, implementation and evaluation of a comprehensive approach to suicide prevention that simultaneously addresses opioid overdose deaths.

SHDs & their pre-existing advisory groups/coalitions

• Track 1 and Track 2 SHDs (as described in Section 15) will already have broad-based support for suicide prevention and a history of collaborative planning for comprehensive suicide prevention. Collaborative partnerships (e.g. coalitions, advisory groups) may include state and local entities, private sector, community-based organizations, researchers, data providers, people with lived experience, and survivors of suicide loss, among others.

Because SHDs will also address opioid overdoses, existing partnerships will need to expand to include appropriate representation from the substance abuse field (including state/local, public/private sector partners).

Recipient & Track 1 State

• The recipient will collaborate with the Track 1 state to provide CBA to Track 2 states. This may include, for example, the recipient providing ongoing monitoring and documentation of Track 1 activities/lessons learned that can benefit Track 2 states and contribute to best practices for other states in the future.

The recipient will subcontract with three SHDs (called Tracks 1 & 2). SHDs on both tracks will have a high burden (i.e. combination of high rates and/or counts) of suicide and opioid deaths but varying levels of readiness for comprehensive action defined by, at a minimum:

1. Available staffing to carry out activities (present in Tracks 1, 2)

2. Available years of data from the National Violent Death Reporting System

◦ Track 1: Three to five

◦ Track 2: Two

3. Surveillance of nonfatal self-harm and opioid overdoses:

◦ Track 1: Uses syndromic surveillance

◦ Track 2: Uses other data sources

4. Broad-based support for suicide prevention (Tracks 1, 2)

5. A history of collaborative planning for comprehensive suicide prevention (Tracks 1, 2)

6. Number of ongoing evidence-based suicide prevention activities

◦ Track 1: Two activities

◦ Track 2: One activity

7. Capacity to identify high burden areas of the state

◦ Track 1: High

◦ Track 2: Needs guidance

8. Familiarity with CDC's technical package for suicide prevention and Transforming Communities (Tracks 1, 2)

Presence of a Core State Violence and Injury Prevention Program in the state, and collaboration with an Injury Control Research Center (Tracks 1, 2)

Suicide and opioid overdose deaths are two public health challenges of our time taking over 85,000 lives per year. Rates of suicide have increased by 33% between 1999 and 2017 and the number of opioid overdoses was six times higher in 2017 than in 1999. There is an urgent need for state health departments and their partners to address these preventable deaths and their shared risk and protective factors. This project establishes comprehensive public health action to address these injuries. Such comprehensive action has proven effective previously in the United States Air Force where a 33% relative risk reduction in suicide mortality was observed (Knox, Kerry L., et al. "Risk of suicide and related adverse outcomes after exposure to a suicide prevention programme in the US Air Force: cohort study." Bmj 327.7428 (2003): 1376). Additionally, the CDC technical package provides policies, programs, and practices with the best available evidence to reduce suicide and suicide risk (Stone, Deborah M., et al. "Preventing suicide: a technical package of policies, programs, and practice." (2017)).

Total costs to implement and evaluate the comprehensive approach to suicide prevention in one state health department and to increase readiness in two others are estimated at $2 million ($1 million for the Track 1 state and $500,000 each for two track 2 states). Funds will cover funding recipient capacity-building assistance and subcontracted project personnel, fringe benefits, supplies, travel, communications, and indirect costs.

Page 6 of 7FY19 Project Plan - A pilot project to build capacity for comprehensive...

Submission Date: You will be directed to a confirmation screen upon successful save or submission.03/14/2019

Page 7 of 7FY19 Project Plan - A pilot project to build capacity for comprehensive...

4/19/2019 FY19 Project Plan - Advancing Health in All Policies among Local...

https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.com/sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Lists/FY 19 Project_ Plan/Item/displayifs.aspx?List=3539fa06-8525-46d2-9f23-fc5e2b87… 1/5

Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support Na�onal Partnership Branch

FY 2019 CIO Project Plan Final

CDC-RFA-OT18-1802

Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through Na�onal Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Na�on’s Health Project Plan Instruc�ons

You can edit and save a dra� of your plan by clicking the "Save and Close" bu�on below. You can edit your plan at any �me before submi�ng it. You must submit a final version to be considered for the NOFO. Submit the final version by clicking the "Submit" bu�on below. You cannot make edits a�er you click "Submit."

GENERAL INFORMATION

Recipient Name:

1 Project Title (Please do not use all caps):* 14/15 words maximum

2 CIO:*

NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

3 Division, office, or unit:* Office of Policy, Planning and Partnerships

4 CIO Point of Contact (POC) name(s):* CIO POC email address(es):*

Separate mul�ple names, emails, and phone numbers with a semi-colon. CIO POC phone number(es):*

5 Target Popula�on Category to Receive Capacity-Building Assistance (CBA):* Category A

6 Descrip�on of the Target Popula�on:* 15/25 words maximum Note: Proposals should not build capacity for CDC or other federal agencies

PROJECT FUNDING

OT18-1802 Period of Performance Length: August 1, 2018 – July 31, 2023

Budget Period Length: September 1, 2019 – July 31, 2020

Proposed Project Funding Amount:* (11-month budget period)

(Whole numbers only) Funded Unfunded

8 Expected Length of Project:*

The CIO will award new funding each budget period for the remainder of the period of performance.

The CIO will award new funding each budget period for at least two consecu�ve years.

The CIO will fund the project for one year.

CBA PROGRAM APPROACH – NOFO LOGIC MODEL

Select the program strategies and the program outcomes the project should work toward for the length of the project.

9 CBA Program Strategies (Check one or more):*

Public Health Systems Infrastructure: Ac�vi�es to improve opera�onal capacity, such as policies and plans, administra�on and management, and quality improvement

Leadership and Workforce Development: Ac�vi�es to improve leadership and workforce competencies, recruitment, and reten�on

Data and Informa�on Systems: Ac�vi�es to improve collec�on, management, interpreta�on, and dissemina�on of data to guide decision-making

Communica�on and Informa�on Technology: Ac�vi�es to improve use of communica�on and informa�on technology to affect health decisions and ac�ons

Partnerships: Ac�vi�es to improve establishment and maintenance of results-driven partnerships

Laws and Policies: Ac�vi�es to improve the ability to interpret and inform laws, including statutes and regula�ons, and policies that affect health

Programs and Services: Ac�vi�es to improve the iden�fica�on of best prac�ces and the implementa�on of evidence-based/informed programs and services

10 CBA Program Outcomes (Check one or more):*

Short-Term

Improved opera�onal capacity to evaluate, manage, and improve public health systems

Advancing Health in All Policies among Local Health Departments through capacity building and technical assistance

Local health departments, local health officials and their staff, and EH professionals at the local level.

$75,000 https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.com/sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Shared%20Documents/CIO/Project%20Plan%20Instructions%20FY19.pdf https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.om/Sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Shared%20Documents/CIO/Logic%20Model-18-1802.pdf https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.com/sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Lists/FY 19 Project_ Plan/Item/displayifs.aspx?List=3539fa06-8525-46d2-9f23-fc5e2b87… 2/5 p p p y , g , p p y

Improved leadership capacity to iden�fy and priori�ze public health needs

Strengthened core and discipline-specific public health competencies among the workforce to improve job performance

Improved capacity of data and informa�on systems to conduct public health monitoring and surveillance

Improved communica�on and informa�on technology capacity to inform the public efficiently and effec�vely

Improved capacity to establish and maintain partnerships within and across sectors to create a shared vision of health

Increased capacity to evaluate laws and policies to affect health

Improved capacity to iden�fy, priori�ze, and customize relevant programs and services to address public health needs

Intermediate

Increased capability of public health systems to achieve na�onally established standards

Increased leadership decision-making to address public health needs strategically and systema�cally

Strengthened capability of public health workforce to deliver essen�al public health services

Increased capability to use data to inform decision-making and support evidence-based prac�ces and policies

Strengthened capability to use communica�on and informa�on technology to affect health decisions and ac�ons

Strengthened capability to respond to public health priori�es collabora�vely and strategically

Strengthened capability to systema�cally apply and use laws and policies to improve health

Increased capability to implement evidence-based/informed public health programs, policies, and services to address public health needs

PROJECT DETAILS

State the purpose of the project and provide project details for the length of the budget period (11 months).

1. For the selected program strategies, describe proposed ac�vi�es and provide sample process measures to track progress implemen�ng the ac�vi�es.

Describe the expected outputs (resources, tools, products, etc.) and outcomes (changes to occur), and provide sample outcome measures to track progress achieving the outcomes.

2. Complete the ac�vi�es, process measures, outputs, budget period outcomes, and outcome measures column for each program strategy selected.

Project Purpose : * 123/150 words maximum

11 Program Strategies Ac�vi�es Process Measures Outputs Budget Period Outcomes Outcome Measures

LHDs are well-posi�oned to lead efforts to embed health considera�ons into policymaking across sectors. Increased coordina�on can lead to improved government efficiency, shared goals across sectors, and be�er infrastructure to support county, city and regional agencies. Associated health outcomes can then be improved, as health is more consistently considered in the decisions that influence these issues but are made across sectors, jurisdic�ons and levels within and outside government. Through technical evalua�on of the impact of implemen�ng HIAP strategies, the best strategies and sol�ons can be iden�fied, new rela�onships built, and processes implemented that work to address complex environmental health and health equity issues. Eventually, these approaches, tac�cs and strategies will become embedded into the day to day process ul�mately improving our communi�es' health.

Communica�on and Informa�o

Maintain regular communica�on ac�vi�es to enhance best prac�ces around HiAP ini�a�ves at LHDs

At least 2 conference presenta�ons

List of conferences a�ended and presenta�on �tles and slides or poster.

Up to three LHD HiAP blog posts.

List of all tools and resources either updated or added to the Environmental Health in All Policies Toolkit.

Emails sent to the HiAP confernece presenta�ons summary of communcai�on materials dissemianted developed materials

Improved communica�on and informa�on technology capacity to inform the public efficiently and effec�vely

Increased awareness of trends and challenges experienced by local health departments implemen�ng HiAP ini�a�ves, as documented by the technical assistance webinars, evaual�on findings and post-webinar evalua�ons.

Increased knowledge of how the technical assistance webinar series mo�vated the LHDs to provide programs, policies, and services.

Increased knowledge of the successes and opportuni�es for improvement for the HiAP program, as documented by the technical assistance webinars and post-webinar evalua�on results https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.com/sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Lists/FY 19 Project_ Plan/Item/displayifs.aspx?List=3539fa06-8525-46d2-9f23-fc5e2b87… 3/5

ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY AND PROGRAM EXPERIENCE

12 Applicant Organiza�onal Capacity:* 122/200 words maximum the HiAP email list.

List of HiAP-related environmental health communica�ons.

# of abstracts submi�ed

Program and Services

Develop and implement a monthly HiAP technical assistance webinar series for local health officials using the Adobe Connect pla�orm.

Further refine previously developed HiAP evalua�on tool/guidance and develop associated materials to facilitate local level evalua�on or demonstrated ROI of HiAP work

Develop methodology, evalua�on plan, and associated materials to evaluate systems/policy changes, impact and/or ROI resul�ng from implementa�on of HiAP strategies

List of webinar topics and speakers.

List of NACCHO webinar promo�onal ac�vi�es.

List of partner promo�onal ac�vi�es.

Technical assistance webinar recordings and list of webinar par�cipants.

Post-webinar evalua�ons.

Methodology for refining exis�ng eval tool/guidance List of materials referenced

List of poten�al data sources and collec�on strategy for policy evalua�on Matrix of evalua�on ques�ons, data sources, data collec�on method, �me line and dra� instruments

# of case studies, and interviews conducted to garner feedback on the u�lity of the HiAP evalua�on tool # of references accessed and list of models used to develop HiAP policy impact evalua�on

10 monthly HiAP calls

Pla�orm for peer networking

Summary of lessons learned/improvements to the HIAP evalua�on tool/guidance

Addi�onal eval tools

Evalua�on plan for assessing systems change resul�ng from HIAP implementa�on

Summary of Ini�al implementa�on of evalua�on plan

Developed evalua�on plan tools/instruments

Increased capacity among LHDs to improve policies, programs and services.

Increased access to tools and resources among LHDs that can assist in the delivery of public health programs, products, and services.

Improved capacity to iden�fy, priori�ze, and customize relevant programs and services to address public health needs.

Enhanced HiAP learning opportuni�es for LHDs and other segments of the public health workforce as measured by the number of presenta�ons, blog posts, policy statements, and tools and resources made available through the Environmental Health in All Policies Toolkit.

Applicant organiza�ons must demonstrate:

Sufficient capability and capacity to carry out ac�vi�es proposed.

Capacity and infrastructure to effec�vely and efficiently collaborate with local health departments, local environmental health professionals and other environmental health organiza�ons.

Staff capacity and experience to develop RFPs, evalua�on study designs and provide LHDs technical assistance.

Experience providing a LHD technical assistance program on HiAP Capacity to develop local health department iden�fied tools/resources, facilitate discussions in a collabora�ve environment or workgroup, and carry out the annual work plan.

Evidence of past success in carrying out ac�vi�es of similar size and scope.

The organiza�on must implement work ac�vi�es and meet specified objec�ves with defined deliverables in a �me-oriented manner as iden�fied in the work plan.

https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.com/sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Lists/FY 19 Project_ Plan/Item/displayifs.aspx?List=3539fa06-8525-46d2-9f23-fc5e2b87… 4/5

13 Applicant Program Experience:* 141/200 words maximum

COLLABORATIVE WORK

14 Expecta�ons for Collabora�on, as applicable: 44/200 words maximum

15 Expected Subcontractual Work and Recommended Criteria for Selec�ng Subcontractors, as applicable: 89/200 words maximum

16 Will the proposed CBA benefit governmental public health agencies?* Yes No

Briefly describe how. : * 39/200 words maximum

BUDGET INSTRUCTIONS

17 General Instruc�ons for Use of Funds, as applicable: 81/100 words maximum

Applicants should have demonstrated program exper�se in the following capaci�es:

Extensive environmental health and health in all policies subject ma�er exper�se, with specific experience suppor�ng local departments Experience scoping, developing and implemen�ng a request for technical assistance process which results in demonstrated environmental public health impact Experience scoping, developing and implemen�ng a policy impact evalua�on Experience implemen�ng a technical assistance program to LHDs, including staff experience in serving in a project officer role for local health department projects and providing technical assistance Experience in developing training and tools/resources for local health leadership and local EH professionals.

Exis�ng mechanism and infrastructure to communicate and reach local health departments.

Experience in suppor�ng groups of local health staff and EH professional in par�cular, crea�ng a culture of collabora�on and suppor�ng successful change management, leadership buy-in and norm shi�ing ac�vi�es among local health agencies leadership and staff

Applicants are expected to collaborate with CDC, other cross-sector associa�ons and organiza�ons which support EH professionals at the state, local and/or territorial level CDC may also seek collabora�on among funded partners to foster informa�on sharing, strategic planning and coordina�on, cross-promo�on and poten�al joint convening.

It may be necessary to undertake subcontracts to best serve the technical needs of local health departments. Selec�ng the subcontractors will occur in consulta�on with CDC.

Materials and webinars developed may be useful for local health departments, local health officials and their staff, and EH professionals at the local level along with inform CDC programming, resrouce development and priori�es and/or needs for future investment.

The proposed funding amount is subject to the availability of funds. Applicant proposals should be scalable. If less funds are available, CDC and the applicant will work together to revise and further priori�ze ac�vi�es in the work plan.

Applicants must provide an itemized budget with the following headers:

• Salaries and wages

• Fringe benefits

• Consultant costs

• Equipment

• Supplies

• Travel – Specify the number and organiza�onal affilia�ons of all mee�ng par�cipants the applicant organiza�on intends to travel to the mee�ng

• Other categories

• Direct costs

• Contractual costs https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.com/sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Lists/FY 19 Project_ Plan/Item/displayifs.aspx?List=3539fa06-8525-46d2-9f23-fc5e2b87… 5/5

CIO CERTIFICATION

By submi�ng this project plan, I cer�fy that my CIO currently does not maintain a comparable NOFO related to a CBA. I understand my CIO is responsible for overseeing the Data Management Plans, ensuring adherence to the Paperwork Reduc�on Act (PRA), and obtaining Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Clearance. I will discuss the project with my Associate Director for Science (ADS) and ini�ate the appropriate clearance prior to funding.

Fina

Submission Date: You will be directed to a confirma�on screen upon successful save or submission.03/15/2019

4/19/2019 FY19 Project Plan - Bridging preparedness, infectious disease,...

https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.com/sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Lists/FY 19 Project_ Plan/Item/displayifs.aspx?List=3539fa06-8525-46d2-9f23-fc5e2b87… 1/3

Center for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support Na�onal Partnership Branch

FY 2019 CIO Project Plan Final

CDC-RFA-OT18-1802

Strengthening Public Health Systems and Services through Na�onal Partnerships to Improve and Protect the Na�on’s Health Project Plan Instruc�ons

GENERAL INFORMATION

Recipient Name:

1 Project Title (Please do not use all caps):* 12/15 words maximum

2 CIO:*

NATIONAL CENTER ON BIRTH DEFECTS AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

3 Division, office, or unit:* Division Of Defects And Developmental Disabili�es

4 CIO Point of Contact (POC) name(s):* CIO POC email address(es):*

Separate mul�ple names, emails, and phone numbers with a semi-colon. CIO POC phone number(es):*

5 Target Popula�on Category to Receive Capacity-Building Assistance (CBA):* Category A

6 Descrip�on of the Target Popula�on:* 4/25 words maximum Note: Proposals should not build capacity for CDC or other federal agencies

PROJECT FUNDING

OT18-1802 Period of Performance Length: August 1, 2018 – July 31, 2023

Budget Period Length: September 1, 2019 – July 31, 2020

Proposed Project Funding Amount:* (11-month budget period)

(Whole numbers only) Funded Unfunded

8 Expected Length of Project:*

The CIO will award new funding each budget period for the remainder of the period of performance.

The CIO will award new funding each budget period for at least two consecu�ve years.

The CIO will fund the project for one year.

CBA PROGRAM APPROACH – NOFO LOGIC MODEL

Select the program strategies and the program outcomes the project should work toward for the length of the project.

9 CBA Program Strategies (Check one or more):*

Public Health Systems Infrastructure: Ac�vi�es to improve opera�onal capacity, such as policies and plans, administra�on and management, and quality improvement

Leadership and Workforce Development: Ac�vi�es to improve leadership and workforce competencies, recruitment, and reten�on

Data and Informa�on Systems: Ac�vi�es to improve collec�on, management, interpreta�on, and dissemina�on of data to guide decision-making

Communica�on and Informa�on Technology: Ac�vi�es to improve use of communica�on and informa�on technology to affect health decisions and ac�ons

Partnerships: Ac�vi�es to improve establishment and maintenance of results-driven partnerships

Laws and Policies: Ac�vi�es to improve the ability to interpret and inform laws, including statutes and regula�ons, and policies that affect health

Programs and Services: Ac�vi�es to improve the iden�fica�on of best prac�ces and the implementa�on of evidence-based/informed programs and services

10 CBA Program Outcomes (Check one or more):*

Short-Term

Improved opera�onal capacity to evaluate, manage, and improve public health systems

Bridging preparedness, infec�ous disease, maternal-child health and birth defects within ci�es and coun�es

Local health departments

$250,000 https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.com/sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Shared%20Documents/CIO/Project%20Plan%20Instructions%20FY19.pdf https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.om/Sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Shared%20Documents/CIO/Logic%20Model-18-1802.pdf https://cdcpartners.sharepoint.com/sites/CSTLTS/COS/COSP/Lists/FY 19 Project_ Plan/Item/displayifs.aspx?List=3539fa06-8525-46d2-9f23-fc5e2b87… 2/3