C5 Attachment 2 Evaluation Table.pdf

PDF 99 KB Posted

Attached to
DNN Subject Matter Expert
Solicitation number
HQ0516-21-R-0103
Issued by

About this file

This document provides evaluation tables for technical ratings and past performance ratings related to a federal solicitation from the Defense Media Activity. The solicitation, number HQ0516-21-R-0103, seeks a DNN Subject Matter Expert. The evaluation tables define ratings of Acceptable and Unacceptable for technical proposals and past performance records as they relate to a responsibility determination in accordance with the FAR. An Acceptable technical rating indicates a proposal that meets solicitation requirements, while an Unacceptable rating signifies a proposal that does not meet requirements. For past performance, an Acceptable rating represents a satisfactory performance history or a lack of relevant history that does not impact responsibility, as defined by the FAR. An Unacceptable past performance rating denotes a seriously deficient or otherwise unsatisfactory record per the FAR.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Limited Sources.pdf PDF
C5 Attachment 1 Pricing spreadsheeet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HQ0516-21-R-0103.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Evaluation Tables for LPTA

Technical Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Ratings for Past Performance as it Relates to Responsibility Determination Rating Description

Acceptable The offeror has a satisfactory performance record, or lack of relevant perfor-mance history does not impact responsibility determination (see FAR 9.104- 1(c) and 9.104-2).

Unacceptable The offeror's performance record is seriously deficient or otherwise unsatis-factory as defined in FAR 9.104-3(b).

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .