Bridge Inspection Report 4290-031P.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Colonial National Historical Park Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-24-B-000009
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report for Structure No. 4290-031P, the Long Bridge over Kingsmill Creek in the Colonial National Historical Park. The report details the findings of a routine inspection conducted on June 12, 2023, including the structural condition, recommended repairs, and estimated costs.
The key issues identified include shifting beams, deterioration of pile jackets, and decay in the wingwalls and curbs. Recommended rehabilitation work includes shimming a beam, replacing decayed timber elements, and other repairs. The report also provides the bridge's load ratings and structure inventory details. This report appears to be supporting a related federal contract opportunity, solicitation number 693C73-24-B-000009, for the rehabilitation of seven bridges within the Colonial National Historical Park, with an estimated contract value between $2,000,000 and $5,000,000. The contract will be set aside for certified Small Business Concerns, with bid documents expected to be issued on or about May 1, 2024.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Results of Bid Opening - Project VA NP COLO 1C15 1D48 1E15.pdf | ||
| IFB Solicitation - VA NP COLO 1C14 1D48 1E15.pdf | ||
| Plans - NP COLO 1C14 1D48 1E15.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 4290-023P.pdf | ||
| Categorical Exclusion Form (NEPA).pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidders Qualifications Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Bridge Inspection Report 4290-025P.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 4290-024P.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 4290-028P.pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 4290-026P.pdf | ||
| Bridge Inspection Report 4290-029P.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212 Form.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
LONG BRIDGE
LOOP DRIVE OVER KINGSMILL CREEK
COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
LW
STRUCTURE NO. 4290-031P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 6/12/2023
SU
Report prepared by:
Federal Highway Administration MILE POINT: 3.65 FLH Office of Bridges and Structures Bridge Inspection Program 22001 Loudoun County Parkway, Building E2, Suite 200 Ashburn, VA 20147
KILOMETER POINT: 5.87
https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4290-031P
LONG BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 06/12/2023
The Structure Evaluation Summary is continued on the next page.
It should also be noted that some of the beams have shifted and do not fully bear on the bent caps, with vertical gaps up to 1/2". In addition, some of the bent caps do not fully bear on the piles and are offset laterally up to 1- 1/2". Many of the piles in the main and secondary channels were rehabilitated with fiberglass jackets during the 2001 reconstruction; however, the piles that were not jacketed at that time currently exhibit moderate to severe decay and should be repaired.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
The replacement of 15 glulam deck timbers, tightening and replacement of missing beam splice bolts, pile bracing replacement, FRP pile jacket installation, and repair of Bent #36 cap are scheduled to be completed under Project COLO 1C14, 1D48, and 1E15. Therefore, no recommendations or project costs are included for these elements.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4290-031P
LONG BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 06/12/2023
PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT226
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
C
Item No.
Maintenance Recommendations
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST
PRELIM.
COST
ESTIMATE
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
Item No.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST
PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES
REHAB RECONSTR
59.2 SHIM BEAM #6 IN SPAN #36 AT BENTS #35 AND
#36.
58.5,60.6 REPLACED DECAYED AND BROKEN TIMBERS
IN THE WINGWALLS AND CURBS.
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,
TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND CONTINGENCIES.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
Replacement of 15 glulam deck timbers, tightening and replacement of missing beam splice bolts, pile bracing replacement, FRP pile jacket installation, and repair of Bent #36 cap are scheduled to be completed under Project COLO 1C14, 1D48, and 1E15. Therefore, no recommendations or project costs are included for these elements.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4290-031P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 12 11 17 15
HS 22 20 30 27
TYPE 3 18 16 25 23
TYPE 3S2 29 26 40 36
TYPE 3-3 36 33 50 45
DESIGN LOADING: 1 - H 10
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
X ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 05/30/2019
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: BEAM MOMENT CAPACITY
REMARKS: SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR LOAD RATING CALCULATIONS.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4290-031P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............LONG BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........4290-031 P
3 - NORTHEAST(205) NPS REGION:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:
(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 031P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes
(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S):................... 19A2
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:...........NONE
(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:
513 - VIRGINIA
51095 JAMES CITY
00000
1 6 4 00501 0
KINGSMILL CREEK
LOOP DRIVE
4290031P0000000
1 0 MILES FROM TOUR ROAD END.
99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
3.65 (KM PT: 5.87 )
3 - ON FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........7 - WOOD OR TIMBER (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER
GIRDER
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............041 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............17 FT ( 5.2 M)
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 697. FT ( 212.4 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 4 - PILE BENT A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. 0 - NONE
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 4 - PILE BENT B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. 0 - NONE
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 4 - PILE BENT C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. 0 - NONE
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 4 - PILE BENT (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... YES
(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 8 - WOOD OR TIMBER
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................1 - H 10 (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. P - POSTED FOR LOAD
(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............22 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 2 - 20.0-29.9% BELOW LEGAL LOADSTONS ( 20
(3-5 TONS)
(64) OPERATING RATING:..............30 TONS ( 27.2 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 06/12/2023 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... N
(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:..................... N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:........ N
INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4290-031P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE:................................ 37° 12'24 80" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 13.0 FT ( 4 M)
(17) LONGITUDE:............................ 76°45 '34 50" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 14.2 FT ( 4.3 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 3 MI ( 5 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 16.0 FT ( 4.9 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 12.0 FT ( 3.7 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 2 0 FT ( 0.6 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 2 0 FT ( 0.6 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............234 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2007 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE
(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................260 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 13 FT ( 4 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2027 (50) SIDEWALKS
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........0 RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:...... 4 - CURB-TYPE WHEEL GUARD
(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:........... MATERIAL:........................... 7 - T MBER
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
(55) RIGHT:...............................00 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 1 04 FT ( 0 32 M)
(56) LEFT:................................ 0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... .00 FT ( 0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:....................................... 5 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............7 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 5 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N
(61) CHANNEL:................................8 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(222) APPROACHES:...................... 7 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 5 - SCOUR WITHIN LIMITS OF
FOOTING OR PILES
(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: N N N N (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: C - MODERATE
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( 0 M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2001- DECK & SUPERSTRUCTURE REPLACED; PILES JACKETED AT BENTS #11-#13 AND #24-#26. 2003- DAMAGE FROM HURRICANE ISABEL; DECK, SUPERSTRUCTURE, AND PILE CAPS.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
WADE AT LOW TIDE.
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:
4' WIDE GLULAM DECK PANELS.
Inspector: Nate Brown Structure Number: 4290031P0000000
Inspection Date: 06/12/2023 Facility Carried: LOOP DRIVE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 3
Description LOOKING EAST (BACK) ALONG ONE-WAY TOUR ROAD
PHOTO 4
Description NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 5
Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST
PHOTO 6
Description GENERAL VIEW OF LOAD POSTING ADVANCE WARNING, BEGINING OF TOUR ROAD
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 7
Description TYPICAL CHECKING AND WEATHERING OF GLULAM TIMBER DECK SURFACE; SPAN #12
SHOWN
PHOTO 8
Description AREA OF DECAY IN DECK SURFACE IN SPAN #27
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 9
Description TWO AREAS OF DECAY IN DECK SURFACE IN SPAN #32
PHOTO 10
Description AREA OF DECAY REPAIRED WITH SEEL PLATE IN SPAN #41; NOTE DECAY EXTENDS
BEYOND REPAIRED AREA WITH ADDITIONAL AREA OF DECAY ADJACENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 11
Description AREA OF DECAY REPAIRED WITH STEEL PLATE IN SPAN #41; NOTE DECAY EXTENDS
BEYOND REPAIRED AREA
PHOTO 12
Description TYPICAL NUTS MISSING AT ISOLATED CURB TO DECK CONNECTIONS ON DECK
UNDERSIDE; NORTH EDGE OF DECK IN SPAN #8 NEAR BENT #8 SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 13
Description NORTH CURB BROKEN FULL DEPTH AT BENT #39, SPAN #40
PHOTO 14
Description DECAY IN TOP OF NORTHEAST WINGWALL
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 15
Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST, SPAN #15
PHOTO 16
Description GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 17
Description SPLITTING OF CENTER PILE AT BENT #2, EAST SIDE
PHOTO 18
Description TYPICAL BROKEN BEAM END DUE TO SUBSTRUCTURE SHIFTING; NORTH SIDE OF BEAM
#6 IN SPAN #4 AT BENT #4 SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 19
Description GENERAL VIEW OF BENT #5, EAST SIDE
PHOTO 20
Description MISSING SECTION FROM NORTH END OF BENT CAP #6 CAP
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 21
Description SHAKE IN BEAM #7 IN SPAN #10 NEAR BENT #9
PHOTO 22
Description TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF EPOXY SEAL AT TOP OF PILE JACKETS; NORTH PILE AT
BENT #13 SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 23
Description SHAKE OF BENT #14 CAP AT NORTH END
PHOTO 24
Description TYPICAL RUSTING OF BOLTS AND WASHERS AT EXTERIOR BEAM SPLICES OVER BENTS;
NORTH SPLICE OVER BENT #15 SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 25
Description TYPICAL CHECKING OF TIMBER PILES; SOUTH PILE AT BENT #15 SHOWN
PHOTO 26
Description TYPICAL CHECKING OF BEAMS; NORTH FACE OF BEAM #4 IN SPAN #16 SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 27
Description TYPICAL LATERAL DISPLACMENT OF BENT CAPS; BENT #22 SHOWN; NOTE BENT CAP
DOES NOT FULLY BEAR ON CENTER PILE
PHOTO 28
Description TYPICAL CHECKING OF BEAMS; EXTERIOR SIDE OF BEAM #1 IN SPAN #29 SHOWN
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 29
Description CHECKING AND DECAY OF CENTER PILE AT BENT #29
PHOTO 30
Description AREA OF SPLINTERING AT NORTH END OF BENT #36 CAP ON SPAN #36 SIDE; ALSO NOTE
LOSS OF BEARING TO BEAMS #7 AND #8
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 31
Description GAP BELOW BEAM #6 IN SPAN #36 OVER BENT #36 CAP
PHOTO 32
Description 2 OF 4 NUTS MISSING AT INTERIOR SIDE OF BEAM #8 SPLICE CONNECTION AT BENT #36;
NOTE 2 OF 4 BOLTS CAN BE REMOVED BY HAND
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 33
Description SHAKE IN BEAM #7 IN SPAN #37 AT BENT #36
PHOTO 34
Description CROSS BRACING DETATCHED BETWEEN BEAMS #7 AND #8 IN SPAN #39
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 35
Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL, SPAN #13
PHOTO 36
Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, SPAN #13
Bridge Inspection Report
Pictures
PHOTO 37
Description UPSTREAM CHANNEL, SPAN #25
PHOTO 38
Description DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, SPAN #25
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .