BID QA S2340.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 23 KB Posted Apr 17, 2023

Attached to: Consulting, Marketing and Education Services
Solicitation number: 99SWC-S2340
Issued by: Churchill County, Nevada

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Apr 2, 2024

This document is a Bid Q&A for a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) issued by the State of Nevada for Consulting, Marketing and Education Services. The RFQ seeks to establish a multi-vendor contract for a variety of services including Program Evaluation, Project Management, Data Analysis and Reporting, and others. The contract term is for four years with an option to extend for two additional years, for a potential six-year total. Vendors can respond to one or more of the eight defined Scopes of Work and the State may make multiple awards. Responses are due by May 18, 2023 at 2:00 PM PT.

The RFQ provides historical spend data for the service categories and indicates the State will apply a 1% administrative fee to any subsequent user agency service agreements. The State prefers vendors that can provide services in-house versus through subcontractors. Vendors are required to submit resumes and describe their philosophy on delivering the required services. The State will not accept redline edits to the contract terms, but will allow vendors to acknowledge compliance. While there is no minimum or maximum contract value, the State does not provide an estimated budget for the overall opportunity.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Reference Questionnaire~1.docx	DOCX document	Apr 17, 2023
99SWC-S2340 Letter of Intent.pdf	PDF	Apr 17, 2023
Scopes of Work S2340.docx	DOCX document	Apr 17, 2023
Quote Instructions.pdf	PDF	Apr 17, 2023
Terms and Conditions for Goods~2.pdf	PDF	Apr 17, 2023
Statewide Contract for Services.docx	DOCX document	Apr 17, 2023
Cost Schedule S2340.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 17, 2023
Attachments for Signature.pdf	PDF	Apr 17, 2023
Terms and Conditions for Services~2.pdf	PDF	Apr 17, 2023
Statewide Contract Terms S2340.pdf	PDF	Apr 17, 2023
Proposed Staff Resume S2340.docx	DOCX document	Apr 17, 2023
Revised 99SWC-S2340 Letter of Intent.pdf	PDF	Apr 17, 2023
99SWC-S2340 RFP Consulting Marketing and Education.docx	DOCX document	Apr 17, 2023
RFP Amendment 1 - Sign and include with Technical Proposal.pdf	PDF	Apr 17, 2023
Insurance Schedule S2340.docx	DOCX document	Apr 17, 2023

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Bid Q&A for Export Report

Bid Q&A
QUESTION_NBR	CREATED_BY	QUESTION_SUBJECT	QUESTION_TEXT	ANSWER_TEXT
1	KMARSCHALL	Cost Proposal	If fees go up over the course of the contract, should that be reflected in the notes section of the cost proposal by type of service?	Yes
2	BERRYDUNN	Spend History	Please provide any data regarding prior fiscal year spend for the categories in the scope of work, specifically Program Evaluation, Project Management, and Data Analysis and Reporting.	Marketing (including Needs Assessment)

$ 4,955,881.57 Conference Planning $ 1,046,447.99 Facilitation $ 3,018,063.05 Community Building $ 2,150,912.60 Program Evaluation $ 4,994,267.81 Training $ 6,739,017.12 Project Management $ 9,198,532.05 Data Analysis /Reports $ 7,702,373.10

3	BERRYDUNN	Contract history	Is there any contract history including names of contractors, spend per contract, or copies of contracts?	Previous contract can be found in NevadaEpro.com and a separate attachment will be uploaded.
4	BERRYDUNN	Agency interest	Did the State request input from state or local government agencies to obtain the scope of work specifics and level of interest in contracting with vendors for this work?	This RFQ was designed to support various state agencies that would have similar needs. This solicitation replaces a previous RFP ran for the Department of Health and Human Services to align with state regulations.
5	KMARSCHALL	Template Availability	Is there a template that should be used for any components that are part of the Technical Proposal list on page 7, section 10.2, of the RFP? Does a vendor responding to multiple SOWs submit separate "Response to Scope of Work" responses for each SOW within 10.2.E, with the rest of the items listed in the Technical Proposal list being common to the whole vendor organization?	There is a template for the resumes, but that is the only one that state provides. It will be uploaded with these answers.
6	KMARSCHALL	Vendor Information Response	Should 2.3.2. of the Vendor Information Response sheet be duplicated for each contract that the vendor has executed with a state agency?	Vendors, may duplicate or expand the text field.
7	KMARSCHALL	Proposal Section	Can you define "proposal section" as noted in 10.1.2 of the RFP? Is "per proposal section" specifically referencing the scopes of work, or does it mean every section under 10.2?	Proposal sections are listed as, 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7
8	KMARSCHALL	Needs Assessment section	"Needs Assessment" was previously a stand-alone service that a vendor could apply for, but it is not under the Marketing Services. Can a vendor apply for section 1.3 (Needs Assessment) only?	This RFQ was designed to support various state agencies that would have similar needs. The scopes were adjusted to fulfill that statewide requirement. Vendors should respond to the solicitation in a manner that demonstrates their ability to provide services they are bidding for. The RFQ is setup to allow for multiple awards based on demonstrated competence in their area of scope.
9	KMARSCHALL		For a vendor that is responding to multiple SOWs, do they need to explain how they ensure how Shared Community Vision, Evidence Based Decision Making, Community Engagement, and Collaborative Action are applied to each service (i.e. a separate response within each of the seven services within the Scopes of Work), or only once across the organization? Within what section of the Table of Contents is the SOQ referenced in section 4.3 of the RFP included?	Vendors may answer inclusive of all scopes not per scope
10	JTRUDGEON	Due Date Clarification	Can you please confirm the response is due May 18? The portal says the response is due April 28.	Bid Opening/Proposal Due date is 5/18 at 2pm PT
11	MERCERGHSC	Vendor References	Can Nevada state agency customers serve as vendor References?	Yes
12	MERCERGHSC	Needs Assessment	In the current MSA contract RFP 40DHHS-S30), Needs Assessment was a separate scope of work item. In this new MSA RFP S2340, Needs Assessment is labeled item 1.3 within the Marketing Services scope of work. Was inclusion of Needs Assessment in Marketing Services correct or should Needs Assessment be a separate scope of work item?	This RFQ was designed to support various state agencies that would have similar needs. The scopes were adjusted to fulfill that statewide requirement. Vendors should respond to the solicitation in a manner that demonstrates their ability to provide services they are bidding for. The RFQ is setup to allow for multiple awards based on demonstrated competence in their area of scope.
13	MERCERGHSC	Scope of Work	If a scope of work item describes multiple types of activities, can vendors focus on certain activities or does every activity within a scope of work need to be fully covered by the vendor?s response?	Yes, Vendors should respond to the solicitation in a manner that demonstrates their ability to provide services they are bidding for. The RFQ is setup to allow for multiple awards based on demonstrated competence in their area of scope.
14	MERCERGHSC	2.2 Project Overview	Section 2.2 Project Overview indicates that the contract term is four years with the option to extend for two additional years for a potential six year total contract year. For the pricing/cost schedule, are vendors permitted to include annual inflationary adjustments to the proposed per/hour rates and if so, where do vendors identify/document those per/hour adjustments?	Vendors are encouraged to provide their best response. A state initiated amendment is needed for any years outside the original 4 years, subject to BOE approval, and in the best interest of the state.
15	MERCERGHSC	Section 2 of the Statewide Contract Terms	Does the 1.0% administrative fee described in Section 2 of the Statewide Contract Terms apply to all subsequent user agency service agreements associated with this new RFP/contract?	Yes. Should two or more state agencies engage in work using the statewide contract the Admin fee applies.
16	MERCERGHSC	Section 7.1.5 Evaluation	Section 7.1.5 Evaluation notes that the ?availability of services offered in-house versus sub-contractors? has a relative weight of 25. In this context, does Nevada prefer vendors that perform all or most of the services with in-house resources and thus minimize use of subcontractors?	The state prefers to apply all cost savings solutions available whenever possible.
17	MERCERGHSC	Section 4 Vendor Response	Section 4 Vendor Response says that in addition to specific SOW details, Vendors shall explain how work is performed consistent with the four sub-items of 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3, and 4.3.4. Is it correct the vendors are to respond once to each of the 4.3.X sub-items at a firm level basis and not address each of the 4.3.X sub-items for each individual SOW?	Vendors may answer inclusive of all scopes not per scope
18	MERCERGHSC	Section 9.2 Contract Form	Section 9.2 Contract Form indicates that vendors can submit red-line Word versions of the ?Contract Form? with their proposal response. Can the State please provide Word versions of the Statewide Contract Terms and the separate Terms and Conditions for Services documents to facilitate submitting proposed red-line edits?	A word version of the contract will be provided, redlines for Terms and Conditions for Services will not be accepted.
19	MERCERGHSC	Section 9.4 Vendor Background	Section 9.4 Vendor Background has limits on page length. For example, if the RFP says a response is ?limited to two single-spaced pages per SOW?, does this mean two pieces of paper front/back (e.g., page 1, 2, 3 and 4) or one piece of paper front/back (e.g., page 1 and 2)?	PDF files do not have a front and a back.
20	MERCERGHSC	Vendor Staff Resumes	Is there a mandated format/form to use for Vendor Staff Resumes?	Yes, The attachment will be uploaded with the answers to the questions.
21	QUANTUMM	Pricing Clarity	Can you please provide clarity around how you'd like to see pricing. Are you 1 - wanting vendors to create a generic scope of work for the different SOW sections and provide pricing per line item. Or 2 - asking for the pricing per person/role who we'd have working on the different SOW options? Or if neither, please confirm.	Pending Answer
22	KMARSCHALL	Critical Items	Is there a description for the Critical Items to be included in the Technical Proposal or should the vendor identify the anticipated Critical Items?	Critical Items are listed in Section 9.
23	KMARSCHALL	Certificate of Insurance	Is a Certificate of Insurance (COI) needed for the proposal as an attachment?	No, vendors are to acknowledge the Insurance Schedule Attachment.
24	KMARSCHALL	Vendor Background	Where should the vendor background content be submitted? It is part of the technical proposal, and if so, in which section A-G should it be included? Should a vendor background section be completed for each SOW response, or common across the entire organization that is submitting multiple SOW responses?	Vendor background is listed in Section 9 Critical Items. Section 10.2 Technical Proposal includes "Critical Items" as Section D.
25	KMARSCHALL	Technical Proposal	Where should the Technical Proposal be submitted? Should one technical proposal for the organization be submitted under Files on the Attachments tab?	Correct. There is a Quote Instructinos document availabe on the RFP attachments with instructions on how to upload your documents.
26	KMARSCHALL	Signed/Required Attachments	Where should the required attachments be submitted? On the Required Attachments section of the Attachments tab, there is no way to add an attachment. Should they be embedded into the Technical Proposal or submitted as a separate file called "Signed Attachments"?	It is preferred that one PDF is uploaded for the Technical Proposal.
27	KMARSCHALL	See Quote Attachments Button	The instructions indicate that we need to toggle on the "See Quote Attachments" for each of the 8 items/SOWs that we intend to bid for, but that box is locked on the Items tab of the Quote. How do we identify through the Quote which items/SOWs we are responding to?	Vendors need to use the "No Cost" to select items they wish to submit for. Cost is to be submitted on the Cost Schedule. Since no cost will be recorded on the items tab it has a default of "no cost"
28	NICOLEROSEDION		re current or former state employees eligible to submit reference questionnaires?	Yes
30	NICOLEROSEDION		On the cost schedule, what information/data is being requested by the ?position? column?
31	NICOLEROSEDION		Is there a preferred resume template?	Yes, The attachment will be uploaded with the answers to the questions.
32	NICOLEROSEDION		Is it possible that multiple bidders will be selected for each Scope of Work section or is there only one awardee per section?	Scopes may be awarded to multiple vendors.
33	NICOLEROSEDION		Is section 9.4.4 limited to 8 pages or does that refer to the limit for the entire section of 9.4?	Each sub section 9.4.1-9.4.4 have individual page limits
34	NICOLEROSEDION		In section 9.4.2 are you looking for the total number of projects over time in a list format or a sampling of the most relevant projects and their overview?	vendors are encouraged to provide their best response.
35	NICOLEROSEDION		In section 1.1.1 of the Marketing Scope of Work, items C,D and E reference ?The Exchange? Can you clarify what Exchange is being referenced?	That is a typo. That section should list the state. Scope was materially similar to a previous RFP, wording was borrowed and the edit was not completed to change the Exchange to the State.
36	NICOLEROSEDION		In section 1.1.1 sub-section E - Provide written communications as needed for various public relations services or requests from the Exchange. Can you confirm the expectation of this deliverable?	Section 1.1.1 should reference the State. That was typo when borrowing similar scope Items from previously written RFP. Scope could include drafting of PSA, public health annoucements, social media posts, etc.
37	KMARSCHALL	Subcontractors	9.6.4 of the RFP indicates that the vendor proposal shall identify specific requirements of the project for which each subcontractor shall perform services. Which section of the technical proposal outlined in section 10.2 A-G should this information be included. Should it be included for each Scope of Work that we are responding to?	Section 9.6.4 is listed under critical items. Please see Section 10.2 for where Critical items are listed.
38	KMARSCHALL	Subcontractors	If a subcontractor is listed as an additional insured under the primary respondent (vendor), are they also required to have their own Nevada business license or can they operate under the license of the vendor?	All vendors (including subcontractors) working under a state contract are required to have a NV business license.
39	NICOLEROSEDION		In section 9.2 Contract Form, should proposers submit a sample attached contract form, or acknowledge they comply with the supplied contract form example.	The state only needs acknowledgement to the terms.
40	NICOLEROSEDION		In section 9.3 Insurance Schedule, should proposers provide proof of insurance or acknowledge agreement to the terms of the attached Insurance Schedule as is.	The state only needs acknowledgement to the terms. Proof will be required once an agency requests work.
41	MERCERGHSC	General	Does the submission of exceptions (i.e., redline edits to contract documents) have any negative impact on the scoring of the vendor?s proposal?	Please see section 9.2 of the RFQ document.
42	ALTARUM		Can the State provide the process for how any work resulting from this contract will be issued to contract holders as a task order/work order?	Using Agencies will be required to seek quotes amonst awarded vendors for the specific needs. Once a project is selected, a state service agreement will be completed by the agency ans sent to the Board of Examiners for approval prior to work being started.
43	ALTARUM		Is there a minimum and/or maximum contract value for associated work resulting from this master service agreement?	No
44	ALTARUM		Can the government confirm that the Using Agencies includes the Nevada Department of Health and Human Services?	Dept. Health and Human Services is anticiapted to be one of the using agencies. This solicitation replaces a previous one that was specifically for DHHS.
46	KENNYGUINN	Clarification of deadlines	One more quick question . . . I understand these Q&As are due tomorrow (April 27), but just wanted to confirm the remainder of the packet/submission is due May 18 by 2 p.m. (except references, which are due the day before (5-17-23) at 5 p.m.)?	Submissions are due 5/18/23 by 2PM PT.
47	KENNYGUINN	Additional questions post-Q&A period	Finally, even though this Q&A portion is due tomorrow (4-27-23) by 5 p.m., is it okay if we reach out to you as we are completing our submission packet in the event we have questions along the way? Thanks so much!	Additonal questions and inquiries will be handled on a instance by instance basis.
48	TYWHITAKER	Incumbent	Is there an incumbent vendor(s) that was previously handling this work?	This is an updated solicitation to be used on a statewide basis for multiple agencies. The previous soliciation and awarded vendors can be viewed in NevadaEpro.com under State Solicitation 40DHHS-S30. https://nevadaepro.com/bso/view/search/external/advancedSearchBid.xhtml?q=40DHHS-S30&currentDocType=bids
49	TYWHITAKER	Nevada-Based Vendors	Will additional points or scoring be provided to businesses based in Nevada?	No preference will be awarded as the potential for Federal Funding removes the use of preferences.
50	TYWHITAKER	Scope Details	Which element of the scope of work is considered the most important in selecting a vendor?	All are equal. This is a multi award RFQ.
51	TYWHITAKER	Additional Details for SOW Items	Can you please provide additional details on item 4.3.2. - ?Evidence Based Decision Making?? Can you elaborate on what types of indicators and/or work may be required under this part of the scope?	Vendors are encouraged to respond to sections in 4.3 with how their entity has supported these and demostrate their competence in providng quality of work during the life of a project.
52	TYWHITAKER	Additional Details for SOW Items	Can you please provide additional information on item 4.3.4. - ?Collaborative Action?? We would like to better understand the shared responsibilities between the State and Vendor - will the Vendor be wholly responsible for building, managing and maintaining the ?action networks? mentioned in the RFP?	Vendors are encouraged to respond to sections in 4.3 with how their entity has supported these and demostrate their competence in providng quality of work during the life of a project.
53	KMARSCHALL	Required Quote Attachments	On the bid page, there is a section for form attachments that then has a blue subsection called Required Quote Attachments. There is no information there and the Required Quote Attachments is not a clickable file. Can you clarify the required Quote attachments for this RFQ?	Please see section 10 of the RFQ document.
54	JTRUDGEON	Budget clarification	Is there an estimated budget for this project?	There is not an estimated budget.
55	JTRUDGEON	Scope of work clarification	Are we required to propose the entire scope of work within each of the categories (e.g., media and marketing) or certain capabilities within that category?	vendors are encouraged to provide their best response.
56	JTRUDGEON	RFP clarification	Can you clarify whether section 9.4.4.	Description of Vendor philosophy on how Vendor will provide deliverables needs to be addressed per SOW (8pgs per SOW) or should it include all SOW we are bidding for (max 8pgs for all)?	vendors are encouraged to provide their best response.
57	JTRUDGEON	Bid clarification	Can you confirm that if we are bidding for all 8 SOW, section 9.4.1 ? 9.4.3 will need to be addressed 8 times per SOW?	Vendors are encouraged to provide their best response in a way that provides compelling evidence of the work performed.
58	MAXHEALTH	RFP Section 4.3 pg. 3	Some of these topics do not seem relevant to all of the SOWs, such as Community Engagement. For example, a vendor proposing the Project Management SOW may not be involved in community engagement. Please clarify how vendors are to respond to these topics if they are not relevant to the SOWs being proposed.	Vendors are encouraged to provide their best response.
59	MAXHEALTH	RFP Section 7.1.5(D), pg. 4	This section states that proposals will be evaluated based on ?list of projects completed. However, Section 9.4 states that you do not have to provide a list of projects but a list of types of projects with average value and length. Please clarify what list of projects is being evaluated.	Please read section 9.4.2 again for clarity. Projects do not need to be listed by name or customer, but should be detailed to be convincing of the work that was done contributing to their ability to provide compelling evidence of a lise of projects that have been completed.
60	MAXHEALTH	RFP Section 9.4.4, pg. 6	With regard to description of the vendor?s philosophy on how it will provide deliverables, we assume this is to be a general discussion of our deliverable development process and not addressing specific deliverables by SOW. If this assumption is incorrect, please clarify what response is expected.	Vendors are encouraged to provide their best response.
61	MAXHEALTH	RFP Section 9.5, pg. 6	Staff are typically assigned based on the experience/skills required for a specific project. Likewise, types are staff required are also determined based on the specific project. Any resumes provided would be representative and may or may not be the staff assigned to a specific project.

Given that vendors are not responding to a specific project, we respectfully request that resumes are not required at this time. Would the State consider having vendors provide job descriptions of the typical roles needed for a given SOW? If resumes are required, how many resumes are required to show a vendor?s ability to provide the type of staff that may be required in the future?

In addition, if resumes are required, we respectfully request that ?key? be removed from the requirement as it implies staff designated as key will be delivered.	Agencies should be able to reach out to Key people identified in the vendor response. Vendors are encouraged to provide their best response.
	62	MAXHEALTH	RFP Section 9.6.4, pg. 6	If we are not proposing subcontractors, do we need to address Section 9.6.4?	No,
	63	MAXHEALTH	RFP Section 9.8.2, pg. 7	We assume that the State is asking for a total of three references regardless of how many SOWs a vendor is responding to. Is this assumption correct?	That is correct.
	64	MAXHEALTH	RFP Section 10.1.2, pg. 7	Vendors are encouraged to submit a single file per proposal section. Is a ?proposal section? considered the Technical Proposal, Proprietary Information, Cost Proposal, etc. or is this referring to the individual sections (Title Page, Table of Contents, Response to Mandatory Minimum Requirements, etc.)?	Proposal sections are listed as, 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7
	65	MAXHEALTH	RFP Section 10.2(E), pg. 7	We assume that the topics listed in Section 4.3 should be provided as part of the Response to Scope of Work. Is this assumption correct? If not, please clarify.	That is correct.
	66	TRIMETRIX3		1.	Does the State require three references for each SOW service area or three references total?	Three in total.
	67	TRIMETRIX3		2.	Is there an expectation on the number of key personnel resumes vendors should submit for each SOW?	No
	68	TRIMETRIX3		3.	Would the State accept federal Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) performance ratings in lieu of references?	No
	69	TRIMETRIX3		4.	Could the State indicate the anticipated value of awards that will be solicited through this contract vehicle?	No, Information is not available. Historic use is answered in a previous question.
	70	TRIMETRIX3		5.	Could the State indicate the anticipated number of awards for this contract vehicle?	No, information does not materially affect a vendor's ability to propose.
	71	TRIMETRIX3		6.	Could the State provide a list of the specific State agencies, departments, or organizations that are committed to use this contract vehicle?	There are no agencies commited to the use of this contract, it is a permissive contract for all state agencies to use.
	72	TRIMETRIX3		7.	Per section 10.2 of the solicitation, the Submission Checklist of the Technical Proposal is listed as followed:
a.	Title Page
b.	Table of Contents
c.	Response to Mandatory Minimum Requirements
d.	Response to Critical Items
e.	Response to Scope of Work
f.	Proposed Staff Resumes
g.	Other Information Material	Correct.
	73	TRIMETRIX3		?	Is the State expecting vendors to include Staff resumes in both section d and section f of the technical proposal? Since staff resumes are also part of the ?critical items,? i.e., section 9.5 of the solicitation.	Duplicate
	74	TRIMETRIX3		Is the State expecting vendors to include Staff resumes in both section d and section f of the technical proposal? Since staff resumes are also part of the ?critical items,? i.e., section 9.5 of the solicitation.	One or the other is acceptable.
	75	MADDIEHUNTLEY	Employees formerly employed by the state	TBC employs a former state employee who is not and will not be accepting any PERS benefits for the duration of the MSA contract, as required by NRS333.705. What is the best way for our company to indicate that this employee will be working on MSA activities? Should this be done within each scope we are applying for?	No, end using agencies will be responsible for the vetting of those items prior to sending their service agreement for final approval at BOE.
	76	MADDIEHUNTLEY	Subcontracting with vendors who will also be applying for a state MSA	Is it allowable for our company to indicate that we sometimes subcontract with entities who are also applying for a state MSA?	Vendors are encouraged to provide their best response.
	77	KPS3MARKETING	Local preference	Do Nevada-based agencies receive any preference?	No, due to the potential of agencies using federal funding.
	78	KPS3MARKETING	Scoring	If we're listed as a recommended vendor as part of another agency's bid, will that affect our scoring in a positive or negative way?	No
	79	KPS3MARKETING	Web/Digital Experience	Where would be most appropriate to show our full website design/development experience. Section 1.1.2 seems most appropriate, but does not list website experience directly. There?s also mention of Web Sites under Media (1.1.6), but this seems centered around Social Media and PR. Can you clarify?	Vendors are encouraged to provide their best response.
	80	KPS3MARKETING	RFP Structure	Are there any formatting or total page limit requirements that we should be aware of within the RFP responses?	No
	81	DOUG@QUINNTHOMAS.COM	Budget	Do you have a NTE (not-to-exceed) amount for any scope areas or general budget ideas from past experience?	No
	82	RVRADENBURG	Section 1.1.1	However, in section 1.1.1 C, D, E of the Scope of work, There's a reference to "the Exchange".
Is the "Exchange" a typo? Was that copied from the NV Healthlink RFP? Or is that in reference to something else?	Exchange is a typo. This RFQ was substantially similar to one for the Health Exchange. Some scope items were adotped to allow for statewide agency usage.
	83	RVRADENBURG	Bid Date	If I'm understanding the amendment correctly, bids including statement of qualifications (SOQ) are not being accepted until the "start date" of this RFQ, 5/18/23. Is my understanding correct? Is there any deadline for SOQ or any other items prior to the 5/18/23 opening date? What is the deadline for SOQ and bid submission?	Responses must be received by the deadline 5/18/2023 at 2PM PT. Nevada has a "closed" bidding process, meaning the state cannot see anything submitted until it has reached the deadline line. Then the Bids/submissions are "opened" hence "bid opening".

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Apr 2, 2024.