BF-03J16101-0.pdf
PDF 348 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 26-059
- Issued by
- Washington County, Barlow City, Oregon
About this file
This is a Cooperative Agreement Notice of Award issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 to the City of Beaverton, Oregon, for a Brownfields Community-Wide Assessment Grant. The City of Beaverton will conduct eligible assessment-related activities within the geographic boundaries of Beaverton, Oregon, including inventory, characterization, assessment, cleanup planning, and community involvement activities. Specifically, the project anticipates conducting up to ten Phase I and up to eight Phase II environmental site assessments, holding at least three community meetings, developing site-specific cleanup plans and Analysis of Brownfield Cleanup Alternatives (ABCA), creating brownfields revitalization planning documents, and submitting sixteen quarterly reports. The recipient must procure and direct a Qualified Environmental Professional to conduct environmental site activities and report on interim progress and final accomplishments through EPA's Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES). The budget period and project period both run from October 1, 2025, through September 30, 2029, with no subawards included in this agreement.
The EPA is awarding a total of $500,000.00 in Federal funding with 100% cost-share coverage of all approved budget period costs, with no recipient matching contribution required. The budget allocation includes $23,040 for personnel, $15,360 for fringe benefits, $5,000 for travel, $437,640 for contractual services, $13,200 for other costs, and $5,760 for indirect costs at 0.00%. The recipient may use up to 5% of Federal funding ($25,000) for administrative costs and may charge pre-award costs incurred from October 1, 2025, through the award date of December 10, 2025. The City must draw down funds within 21 days of the mailing date (December 15, 2025) or file a notice of disagreement within that timeframe. Funding is authorized under CERCLA Sections 104(k)(2) and 104(k)(5)(E), with regulatory authority under 2 CFR 200, 2 CFR 1500, and 40 CFR 33. The City must maintain records for three years following submission of the final financial report and comply with all applicable Federal and state laws, including Davis-Bacon Related Act prevailing wage requirements, cross-cutting requirements, and quality assurance standards.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 1
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
Cooperative Agreement
GRANT NUMBER (FAIN): 03J16101
MODIFICATION NUMBER: 0
PROGRAM CODE: BF
DATE OF AWARD
12/10/2025
TYPE OF ACTION:
New
MAILING DATE
12/15/2025
PAYMENT METHOD:
ASAP
ACH#
X0701
RECIPIENT TYPE:
Municipal
Send Payment Request to:
RTPFC-grants@epa.gov
RECIPIENT:
CITY OF BEAVERTON
P. O. BOX 4755
BEAVERTON, OR 97076-4755
EIN: 93-6002125
PAYEE:
CITY OF BEAVERTON
P. O. BOX 4755
BEAVERTON, OR 97076-4755
PROJECT MANAGER
Mike Williams 12725 SW Millikan Way Beaverton, OR 97076 mwilliams@beavertonoregon.govEmail:
971-325-6048Phone:
EPA PROJECT OFFICER
Matthew Krause 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155 Seattle, WA 98101-3144 krause.matthew@epa.govEmail:
206-617-4831Phone:
EPA GRANT SPECIALIST
Kwansu Ha 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155 Seattle, WA 98101-3144 ha.kwansu@epa.govEmail:
206-553-0837Phone:
PROJECT TITLE AND DESCRIPTION
City of Beaverton FY2025 Brownfields Community-Wide Assessment Cooperative Agreement
See Attachment 1 for project description.
BUDGET PERIOD
10/01/2025 - 09/30/2029
PROJECT PERIOD
10/01/2025 - 09/30/2029
TOTAL BUDGET PERIOD COST
$ 500,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT PERIOD COST
$ 500,000.00
NOTICE OF AWARD
Based on your Application dated 11/13/2024 including all modifications and amendments, the United States acting by and through the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) hereby awards $ 500,000.00. EPA agrees to cost-share 100.00% of all approved budget period costs incurred, up to and not exceeding total federal funding of $ 500,000.00. Recipient's signature is not required on this agreement. The recipient demonstrates its commitment to carry out this award by either: 1) drawing down funds within 21 days after the EPA award or amendment mailing date; or 2) not filing a notice of disagreement with the award terms and conditions within 21 days after the EPA award or amendment mailing date. If the recipient disagrees with the terms and conditions specified in this award, the authorized representative of the recipient must furnish a notice of disagreement to the EPA Award Official within 21 days after the EPA award or amendment mailing date. In case of disagreement, and until the disagreement is resolved, the recipient should not draw down on the funds provided by this award/amendment, and any costs incurred by the recipient are at its own risk. This agreement is subject to applicable EPA regulatory and statutory provisions, all terms and conditions of this agreement and any attachments.
ISSUING OFFICE (GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICE)
ORGANIZATION / ADDRESS
U.S. EPA, Region 10, EPA Region 10 Mail Code: 14-D12, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155 Seattle, WA 98101
AWARD APPROVAL OFFICE
ORGANIZATION / ADDRESS
U.S. EPA, Region 10, Land, Chemicals, and Redevelopment Division R10 - Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 155 Seattle, WA 98101-3144
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Digital signature applied by EPA Award Official Felicia Thomas - Manager, Tribal Grants Section DATE 12/10/2025
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 2
EPA Funding Information
FUNDS FORMER AWARD THIS ACTION AMENDED TOTAL
EPA Amount This Action $ 0 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
EPA In-Kind Amount $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Unexpended Prior Year Balance $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Other Federal Funds $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Recipient Contribution $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
State Contribution $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Local Contribution $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Other Contribution $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Allowable Project Cost $ 0 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Assistance Program
66.818 - Brownfields Multipurpose, Assessment, Revolving Loan Fund, and Cleanup Cooperative Agreements
Statutory Authority
CERCLA: Secs. 104(k)(2) & 104(k)(5)(E)
Regulatory Authority
2 CFR 200, 2 CFR 1500 and 40 CFR 33
Fiscal Site Name Req No FY Approp.
Code Budget
Organization PRC Object Class Site/Project Cost
Organization Obligation / Deobligation
- 2610LDG004 25 E4 10L3AG7 000D79 4114 - - $ 500,000
$ 500,000
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 3
Budget Summary Page
Table A - Object Class Category (Non-Construction)
Total Approved Allowable Budget Period Cost
1. Personnel $ 23,040
2. Fringe Benefits $ 15,360
3. Travel $ 5,000
4. Equipment $ 0
5. Supplies $ 0
6. Contractual $ 437,640
7. Construction $ 0
8. Other $ 13,200
9. Total Direct Charges $ 494,240
10. Indirect Costs: 0.00 % Base $ 5,760
11. Total (Share: Recipient ______ % Federal ______ %)0.00 100.00 $ 500,000
12. Total Approved Assistance Amount $ 500,000
13. Program Income $ 0
14. Total EPA Amount Awarded This Action $ 500,000
15. Total EPA Amount Awarded To Date $ 500,000
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 4
Attachment 1 - Project Description
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, development or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. This agreement will provide funding for City of Beaverton to conduct eligible assessment-related activities as authorized by CERLCA 104(k)(2) in Beaverton, Oregon.
Specifically, this agreement will provide funding to the recipient to inventory, characterize, assess, and conduct cleanup planning and community involvement related activities. Additionally, the recipient will competitively procure (as needed) and direct a Qualified Environmental Professional to conduct environmental site activities. Also, the recipient will report on interim progress and final accomplishments by completing and submitting relevant portions of the Property Profile Form using EPA’s Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES).
Further, the recipient anticipates conducting up to ten Phase I and up to eight Phase II environmental site assessments, holding at least three community meetings, developing site-specific cleanup plans/Analysis of Brownfield Cleanup Alternatives, developing planning documents to initiate brownfields revitalization, and submitting sixteen quarterly reports. Work conducted under this agreement will benefit the residents, business owners, and stakeholders in and near the City of Beaverton, Oregon.
No subawards are included in this assistance agreement.
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 5
Administrative Conditions
NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The recipient agrees to comply with the current Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) general terms and conditions available at: https://www.epa.gov/grants/epa-general-terms-and-conditions-effective-october-1-2025-or-later.
These terms and conditions are in addition to the assurances and certifications made as a part of the award and the terms, conditions, or restrictions cited throughout the award.
The EPA repository for the general terms and conditions by year can be found at: https://www.epa.gov/grants/grant-terms-and-conditions.
A. CORRESPONDENCE
Federal Financial Reports (SF-425): rtpfc-grants@epa.gov
All other forms/certifications/assurances, Indirect Cost Rate Agreements, updates to recipient information (including email addresses, changes in contact information or changes in authorized representatives) and other notifications: R10grants@epa.
gov
Requests for Extensions of the Budget and Project Period, Quality Assurance documents, workplan revisions, equipment lists, programmatic reports and deliverables, Amendment Requests, Requests for other Prior Approvals: The current assigned Project Officer listed on the first page of the award.
Administrative questions and issues: The current assigned Grants Specialist listed on the first page of the award.
B. PRE-AWARD COSTS
In accordance with 2 CFR 1500.9, the recipient may charge otherwise allowable pre-award costs (both Federal and non- Federal matching shares) incurred from [10/1/2025] to the actual award date provided that such costs were contained in the approved application and all costs are incurred within the approved budget period.
https://www.epa.gov/grants/epa-general-terms-and-conditions-effective-october-1-2025-or-later https://www.epa.gov/grants/grant-terms-and-conditions https://www.epa.gov/grants/grant-terms-and-conditions mailto:rtpfc-grants@epa.gov mailto:R10grants@epa.gov mailto:R10grants@epa.gov
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 6
Programmatic Conditions
FY25 Brownfields Community-wide Assessment Cooperative Agreement
Terms and Conditions
Please note that these Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) apply to Brownfield Assessment Cooperative Agreements awarded under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) § 104(k).
I. GENERAL FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
NOTE: For the purposes of these Terms and Conditions, the term “assessment” includes eligible activities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) § 104(k)(2)(A)(i) such as activities involving the inventory, characterization, assessment, and planning relating to brownfield sites as described in the EPA-approved workplan.
A. Federal Policy and Guidance
1. Cooperative Agreement Recipients: By awarding this cooperative agreement, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved the application for the Cooperative Agreement Recipient (CAR) submitted in the Fiscal Year 2025 competition for Brownfield Assessment cooperative agreements.
2. In implementing this agreement, the CAR shall ensure that work done with cooperative agreement funds complies with the requirements of CERCLA § 104(k). The CAR shall also ensure that assessment activities supported with cooperative agreement funding comply with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations.
3. A term and condition or other legally binding provision shall be included in all subawards entered into with the funds awarded under this agreement, or when funds awarded under this agreement are used in combination with non-Federal sources of funds, to ensure that the CAR complies with all applicable Federal and state laws and requirements. In addition to CERCLA § 104(k), applicable Federal laws and requirements include 2 CFR Part 200.
4. The CAR must comply with Federal cross-cutting requirements. These requirements include, but are not limited to, DBE requirements found at 40 CFR Part 33 (as applicable); OSHA Worker Health & Safety Standard 29 CFR § 1910.120; Uniform Relocation Act (40 USC § 61); National Historic Preservation Act (16 USC § 470); Endangered Species Act (P.L. 93-205);
Permits required by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, as amended (40 USC §§ 327-333); the Anti-Kickback Act (40 USC § 3145); and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 USC §§ 793 and 794; 40 CFR Part 7, Subpart C. For additional information on cross-cutting requirements visit https://www.epa.
gov/grants/epa-subaward-cross-cutter-requirements.
5. The CAR must comply with Davis-Bacon Related Act prevailing wage requirements and associated U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) regulations for all construction, alteration, and repair contracts and subcontracts awarded with funds provided under this agreement by operation of CERCLA § 104(g). Assessment activities generally do not involve construction, alteration, and repair within the meaning of the Davis-Bacon Related Act. However, the recipient must contact the EPA Project Officer if there are unique circumstances (e.g., removal of an underground storage tank or another structure and restoration of the site) that indicate that the Davis-Bacon Related Act applies to an activity the CAR intends to carry out with funds provided under this agreement. EPA will provide guidance on Davis-Bacon Act compliance if necessary.
II. SITE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
All brownfield sites that will be addressed using funds from the cooperative agreement must be located within the geographic boundary (i.e., as discussed in the FY25 application) and described in the scope of work for this cooperative agreement (i.e., the EPA-approved workplan).
A. Eligible Brownfield Site Determinations
1. Prior to performing site work, the CAR must provide information to the EPA Project Officer about each site that will be https://www.epa.gov/grants/epa-subaward-cross-cutter-requirements https://www.epa.gov/grants/epa-subaward-cross-cutter-requirements
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 7 addressed under this cooperative agreement. The CAR may use cooperative agreement funds to prepare information that is provided to the EPA Project Officer. The information that must be provided includes whether the site meets the definition of a brownfield site as defined in CERCLA § 101(39), and whether the CAR is a potentially responsible party under CERCLA § 107, is exempt from CERCLA liability, and/or has a defense to CERCLA liability.
2. If the site is excluded from the general definition of a brownfield, but is eligible for a property-specific funding determination, then the CAR may request a property-specific funding determination from the EPA Project Officer. In its request, the CAR must provide information sufficient for EPA to make a property-specific funding determination on how financial assistance will protect human health and the environment, and either promote economic development or enable the creation of, preservation of, or addition to parks, greenways, undeveloped property, other recreational property, or other property used for nonprofit purposes. The CAR must not incur costs for assessing sites requiring a property-specific funding determination by EPA until the EPA Project Officer has advised the CAR that EPA has determined that the property is eligible.
3. Brownfield Sites Contaminated with Petroleum
a. For any petroleum-contaminated brownfield site that is not included in the CAR's EPA-approved workplan, the CAR shall provide sufficient documentation to EPA prior to incurring costs under this cooperative agreement which documents that:
i. the State determines there is “no viable responsible party” for the site;
ii. the State determines that the person assessing or investigating the site is a person who is not potentially liable for cleaning up the site; and
iii. the site is not subject to any order issued under Section 9003(h) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act.
This documentation must be prepared by the CAR or the State, following contact and discussion with the appropriate state petroleum program official. Please contact the EPA Project Officer for additional information.
b. Documentation must include:
i. the identity of the State program official contacted;
ii. the State official's telephone number;
iii. the date of the contact; and
iv. a summary of the discussion relating to the State's determination that there is no viable responsible party and that the person assessing or investigating the site is not potentially liable for cleaning up the site.
Other documentation provided by a State to the recipient relevant to any of the determinations by the State must also be provided to the EPA Project Officer.
c. If the State chooses not to make the determinations described in Section II.A.3. above, the CAR must contact the EPA Project Officer and provide the necessary information for EPA to make the requisite determinations.
d. EPA will make all determinations on the eligibility of petroleum-contaminated brownfield sites located on tribal lands (i.e., reservation lands or lands otherwise in Indian country, as defined at 18 U.S.C. § 1151). Before incurring costs for these sites, the CAR must contact the EPA Project Officer and provide the necessary information for EPA to make the determinations.
III. GENERAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Sufficient Progress
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 8
1. This condition supplements the requirements of the Termination and Sufficient Progress Conditions in the General Terms and Conditions.
The EPA Project Officer will assess whether the recipient is making sufficient progress in implementing the cooperative agreement 18 months and 30 months from the date of award. If EPA determines that the CAR has not made sufficient progress in implementing the cooperative agreement, the CAR, if directed to do so, must implement a corrective action plan concurred on by the EPA Project Officer and approved by the Grants Management Officer or Award Official. Alternatively, EPA may terminate this agreement under 2 CFR § 200.340 either for material non-compliance with its terms or with the consent of the CAR, depending on the circumstances.
Sufficient progress at 18 months is indicated when:
at least 25% of funds have been drawn down and disbursed for eligible activities;
a Qualified Environmental Professional(s) has been procured;
sites are prioritized or an inventory has been initiated (unless site prioritization or an inventory was completed prior to award);
community engagement activities have been initiated; and/or other documented activities have occurred that demonstrate to EPA's satisfaction that the CAR will successfully perform the cooperative agreement.
Sufficient progress at 30 months is indicated when:
at least 45% of funds have been drawn down and disbursed for eligible activities;
assessments on at least two sites have been initiated; and/or other documented activities have occurred that demonstrate to EPA's satisfaction that the CAR will successfully perform the cooperative agreement.
B. Substantial Involvement
1. The EPA Project Officer will be substantially involved in overseeing and monitoring this cooperative agreement. Substantial involvement, includes, but is not limited to:
a. Close monitoring of the CAR's performance to verify compliance with the EPA-approved workplan and achievement of environmental results.
b. Participation in periodic telephone conference calls to share ideas, project successes and challenges, etc., with
EPA.
c. Reviewing and commenting on quarterly and annual reports prepared under the cooperative agreement (the final decision on the content of reports rests with the recipient or subrecipients receiving pass-through awards).
d. Verifying sites meet applicable site eligibility criteria (including property-specific funding determinations described in Section II.A.2.), including when the CAR awards a subaward for site assessment. The CAR must obtain technical assistance from the EPA Project Officer, or his/her designee, on which sites qualify as a brownfield site and determine whether the statutory prohibitions found in CERCLA § 104(k)(5)(B)(i)-(iv) apply. (Note, the prohibition does not allow a subrecipient to use EPA cooperative agreement funds to assess a site for which the subrecipient is potentially liable under CERCLA § 107.)
e. Reviewing and approving Quality Assurance Project Plans and related documents or verifying that appropriate Quality Assurance requirements have been met where quality assurance activities are being conducted pursuant to
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 9 an EPA-approved Quality Assurance Management Plan.
Substantial involvement may also include, depending on the direction of the EPA Project Officer:
f. Collaboration during the performance of the scope of work including participation in project activities, to the extent permissible under EPA policies. Examples of collaboration include:
i. Consultation between EPA staff and the CAR on effective methods of carrying out the scope of work provided the CAR makes the final decision on how to perform authorized activities.
ii. Advice from EPA staff on how to access publicly available information on EPA or other Federal agency websites.
iii. With the consent of the CAR, EPA staff may provide technical advice to the CAR's contractors or subrecipients provided the CAR approves any expenditures of funds necessary to follow advice from EPA staff. (The CAR remains accountable for performing contract and subaward management as specified in 2 CFR § 200.318 and 2 CFR § 200.332 as well as the terms of the EPA cooperative agreement.)
iv. EPA staff participation in meetings, webinars, and similar events upon the request of the CAR or in connection with a co-sponsorship agreement.
g. Reviewing and approving that the Analysis of Brownfield Cleanup Alternatives (ABCA), or equivalent state Brownfields program document, meets the Brownfields Program's requirements for an ABCA.
h. Reviewing proposed procurements in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.325, as well as the substantive terms of proposed contracts or subawards as appropriate. This may include reviewing requests for proposals, invitations for bids, scopes of work, and/or plans and specifications for contracts over $250,000 prior to advertising for bids.
i. Reviewing the qualifications of key personnel. (EPA does not have the authority to select employees or contractors, including consultants, employed by the CAR or subrecipients receiving pass-through awards.)
j. Reviewing information in performance reports to ensure all costs incurred by the CAR and/or its contractor(s) if needed to ensure appropriate expenditure of grant funds.
EPA may waive any of the provisions in Section III.B.1., except for property-specific funding determinations. The EPA Project Officer will provide waivers to provisions a. – e. in Section III.B.1. in writing.
2. Effects of EPA's substantial involvement include:
a. EPA's review of any project phase, document, or cost incurred under this cooperative agreement will not have any effect upon CERCLA § 128 Eligible Response Site determinations or rights, authorities, and actions under CERCLA or any Federal statute.
b. The CAR remains responsible for ensuring that all assessments are protective of human health and the environment and comply with all applicable Federal and state laws.
c. The CAR and its subrecipients remain responsible for ensuring costs are allowable under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E.
C. Cooperative Agreement Recipient Roles and Responsibilities
1. All additional sites selected for eligible activities throughout the period of performance (i.e., sites that were not identified in the workplan) must be located within the geographic boundary(ies) identified by the CAR in the workplan.
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 10
Criteria for selecting additional sites should consider the prioritization criteria identified in the FY25 application, the workplan, or developed during implementation of the workplan. Note, criteria developed during the implementation of the workplan should lead to the CAR addressing sites in areas with similar characteristics to the areas discussed in the FY25 application.
2. The CAR is responsible for ensuring that funding received under this cooperative agreement does not exceed the statutory $200,000 funding limitation for an individual brownfield site. The CAR may request a waiver of the $200,000 funding limitation based on the anticipated level of contamination, size, or status of ownership of the site. Waiver of this funding limit for a brownfield site must be submitted to and approved by the EPA Project Officer prior to the expenditure of funding exceeding $200,000. In no case may funding for site-specific assessment activities exceed $350,000 on a site receiving a waiver.
3. If the CAR's workplan includes eligible planning activities to prepare a brownfield site for reuse (see https://www.epa.
gov/brownfields/information-eligible-planning-activities for eligible planning activities), the CAR must demonstrate meaningful community engagement in the reuse planning of brownfields assessed under the grant. Meaningful community engagement is demonstrated by actively including local nonprofit organizations, citizen leaders, or similar local groups/entities in brownfield reuse planning.
4. CARs, other than state or Tribal entities, that procure a contractor(s) (including consultants) where the contract will be more than the micro-purchase threshold in 2 CFR § 200.320(a)(1) ($10,000 for most CARs) must select the contractor(s) in compliance with the competitive procurement standards in 2 CFR Part 200 (including the requirements for full and open competition). Additionally, all CARs (including State and Tribal entities), regardless of the contract amount, must comply with EPA's regulations at 40 CFR Part 33 as applicable. For additional information on these requirements, see https://www.epa.
gov/grants/rain-2025-g02 and the “Utilization of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises” General Term and Condition of this agreement. These requirements also apply to procurement processes that were completed before the award of this cooperative agreement, to include if the CAR intends to submit payment requests for pre-award costs. See EPA's Best Practice Guide for Procuring Services, Supplies, and Equipment Under EPA Assistance Agreements and the Brownfields Grants: Guidance on Competitively Procuring a Contractor for additional information.
CARs may procure multiple contractors to ensure the appropriate expertise is in place to perform work under the agreement (e.g., expertise to conduct site assessment activities vs. planning activities) and to allow the ability for work be performed concurrently at multiple sites within the defined and approved geographic boundary.
5. The CAR must acquire the services of a Qualified Environmental Professional(s) as defined in 40 CFR § 312.10, if it does not have such a professional on staff to coordinate, direct, and oversee the brownfield site assessment activities at a given site.
6. Cybersecurity – The recipient agrees that when collecting and managing environmental data under this cooperative agreement, it will protect the data by following all applicable State or Tribal law and policy cybersecurity requirements.
a. EPA must ensure that any connections between the recipient's network or information system and EPA networks used by the recipient to transfer data under this agreement are secure. For purposes of this section, a connection is defined as a dedicated persistent interface between an Agency Information Technology (IT) system and an external IT system for the purpose of transferring information. Transitory, user-controlled connections such as website browsing are excluded from this definition.
If the recipient's connections as defined above do not go through the Environmental Information Exchange Network or EPA's Central Data Exchange, the recipient agrees to contact the EPA Project Officer no later than 90 days after this award and work with the designated Regional/ Headquarters Information Security Officer to ensure that the connections meet EPA security requirements, including entering into Interconnection Service Agreements as appropriate. This condition does not apply to manual entry of data by the recipient into systems operated and used by EPA's regulatory programs for the submission of reporting and/or compliance data.
b. The recipient agrees that any subawards it makes under this agreement will require the subrecipient to comply with the requirements in Cybersecurity Section a. above if the subrecipient's network or information system is connected to EPA networks to transfer data to the Agency using systems other than the Environmental Information Exchange Network or EPA's Central Data Exchange. The recipient will be in compliance with this condition: by including this requirement in subaward agreements; and during subrecipient monitoring deemed necessary by the recipient under 2 CFR § 200.332(e), by inquiring whether the subrecipient has contacted the EPA Project Officer.
https://www.epa.gov/brownfields/information-eligible-planning-activities https://www.epa.gov/brownfields/information-eligible-planning-activities https://www.epa.gov/grants/rain-2025-g02 https://www.epa.gov/grants/rain-2025-g02 https://www.epa.gov/grants/best-practice-guide-procuring-services-supplies-and-equipment-under-epa-assistance-agreements https://www.epa.gov/grants/best-practice-guide-procuring-services-supplies-and-equipment-under-epa-assistance-agreements https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-04/BF Guidance on Competitively Procuring a Contractor 4-25-23-508compliant.pdf https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-04/BF Guidance on Competitively Procuring a Contractor 4-25-23-508compliant.pdf
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 11
Nothing in this condition requires the recipient to contact the EPA Project Officer on behalf of a subrecipient or to be involved in the negotiation of an Interconnection Service Agreement between the subrecipient and EPA.
7. All geospatial data created must be consistent with Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) endorsed standards.
Information on these standards may be found at www.fgdc.gov.
8. [If subawards are approved for this agreement] Subawards are defined at 2 CFR § 200.1. The CAR shall not subaward to for-profit organizations or individual consultants. The CAR must obtain commercial services and products necessary to carry out this agreement under competitive procurement procedures as described in 2 CFR §§ 200.317 through 200.327, 2 CFR Part 1500, and 40 CFR Part 33 as applicable. The CAR must obtain written approval from the EPA Award Official for any subawards that are not described in the approved work plan in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.308.
In addition, Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization policy encourages awarding subawards competitively and the CAR must consider awarding subawards through competition. Recipients may consult EPA's Subaward Policy and Best Practice Guide for Procuring Services, Supplies, and Equipment Under EPA Assistance Agreements for additional guidance. Appendix A to EPA's Subaward Policy provides information on distinguishing between subawards and procurement contracts.
9. [If the application includes leveraged resources that will materialize during the period of performance] The CAR agrees to provide the proposed leveraged funding that is described in its workplan. If the proposed leveraging does not materialize during the period of award performance, and the CAR does not provide a satisfactory explanation, EPA may consider this factor in evaluating future applications from the CAR. In addition, if the proposed leveraging does not materialize during the period of award performance, then EPA may reconsider the legitimacy of the award. If EPA determines that the CAR knowingly or recklessly provided inaccurate information regarding the leveraged funding in its FY25 application, EPA may take action as authorized by CERCLA 104(k)(8)(C), 2 CFR Parts 200 and 1500, and/or 2 CFR Part 180 as applicable.
D. Quarterly Performance Reports
1. In accordance with the regulations at 2 CFR Parts 200 and 1500 (specifically, 2 CFR § 200.329, Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance), the CAR agrees to submit quarterly performance reports to the EPA Project Officer within 30 days after each reporting period. Initially, quarterly performance reports will be submitted via email or via the optional Quarterly Reporting function tool within the Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES). The EPA Project Officer will notify the CAR when use of the Quarterly Reporting tool within ACRES is required. Once the EPA Project Officer notifies the CAR of required use, the CAR agrees to use this tool to input quarterly performance reports directly into ACRES within 30 days after each reporting period. The reporting periods are October 1 – December 31 (1st quarter); January 1 – March 31 (2nd quarter); April 1 – June 30 (3rd quarter); and July 1 – September 30 (4th quarter). If a due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the report will be due on the next business day.
These reports shall cover work status, work progress, difficulties encountered, preliminary data results, and a statement of activity anticipated during the subsequent reporting period, including a description of equipment, techniques, and materials to be used or evaluated. A discussion of expenditures and financial status for each workplan task, along with a comparison of the percentage of the project completed to the project schedule and an explanation of significant discrepancies from the EPA-approved workplan and budget shall be included in the report. The report shall also include any changes of key personnel concerned with the project that were approved by the EPA Grants Management Officer or Award Official. (Note, as provided at 2 CFR § 200.308, Revision of budget and program, the CAR must seek prior approval from the EPA Grants Management Officer or Award Official for a change in a key personnel (including employees and contractors) that are identified by name or position in the workplan. Prior approval means the written approval obtained in advance of a recipient taking an action by an authorized official of a Federal agency or pass-through entity of certain costs or programmatic decisions.)
2. The CAR must submit performance reports on a quarterly basis in ACRES using the Assessment Quarterly Report function. Quarterly performance reports must include:
a. A summary that clearly differentiates between activities completed with EPA funds provided under the Brownfield Assessment cooperative agreement and related activities completed with other sources of leveraged funding.
b. A summary and status of approved activities performed during the reporting quarter; a summary of the performance outputs/outcomes achieved during the reporting quarter; and a description of problems encountered during the reporting quarter that may affect the project schedule.
http://www.fgdc.gov https://www.epa.gov/grants/grants-policy-issuance-gpi-16-01-epa-subaward-policy-epa-assistance-agreement-recipients https://www.epa.gov/grants/best-practice-guide-procuring-services-supplies-and-equipment-under-epa-assistance-agreements https://www.epa.gov/grants/best-practice-guide-procuring-services-supplies-and-equipment-under-epa-assistance-agreements
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 12
c. A comparison of actual accomplishments to the anticipated outputs/outcomes specified in the EPA-approved workplan and reasons why anticipated outputs/outcomes were not met.
d. An update on the project schedule and milestones, including an explanation of any discrepancies from the EPA-approved workplan.
e. A list of the properties where assessment and/or planning activities were performed and/or completed during the reporting quarter.
f. A budget summary table with the following information: current approved project budget; EPA funds drawn down during the reporting quarter; costs drawn down to date (cumulative expenditures); program income generated and used (if applicable) (i.e., program income received and disbursed during the reporting quarter and during the entire cooperative agreement, and the amount of program income remaining); and total remaining funds. The budget summary table must include costs that are charged to the “other” budget object class category (e.g., participant support costs, subawards, etc.).
The CAR shall include an explanation of any discrepancies in the budget from the EPA-approved workplan, cost overruns or high unit costs, and other pertinent information. If significant developments occur that negatively impact the Federal Award, the CAR shall include information on their plan for corrective action and any assistance needed to resolve the situation. The CAR shall include a statement on funding transfers among direct budget categories or programs, functions and activities that occurred during the quarter and cumulatively during the period of performance.
Note: ACRES reporting requirements may change over time, based on expansion of EPA's information collection authority, and the CAR is responsible for complying with the latest ACRES reporting requirements at the time of each quarterly performance report. The EPA Project Officer will notify the CAR when ACRES reporting requirements specific to Brownfields Assessment change.
g. [Local governments only] For local governments that are using cooperative agreement funds for health monitoring, the quarterly report must also include the specific budget, the quarterly expenditure, and cumulative expenditures to demonstrate that 10% of Federal funding is not exceeded.
Note: Each property where assessment activities were performed and/or completed must have its corresponding information updated in ACRES (or via the Property Profile Form with prior approval from the EPA Project Officer) prior to submitting the quarterly performance report (see Section III.E. below).
3. The CAR must maintain records that will enable it to report to EPA on the amount of funds disbursed by the CAR to assess the specific properties under this cooperative agreement.
4. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.329(e), the CAR agrees to inform the EPA Project Officer as soon as problems, delays, or adverse conditions become known which will materially impair the ability to meet the outputs/outcomes specified in the EPA-approved workplan.
5. [If subawards are approved as part of this agreement] Because the workplan and budget for this agreement include subawards, the CAR is a pass-through entity under the “Establishing and Managing Subaward” General Term and Condition of this agreement. As the pass-through entity, the CAR must report to EPA on its subaward monitoring activities under 2 CFR § 200.332(e), including the following information on subawards as part of the CAR's quarterly performance reporting:
a. Summaries of results of reviews of financial and programmatic reports;
b. Summaries of findings from site visits and/or desk reviews to ensure effective subrecipient performance;
c. Environmental results the subrecipient achieved;
d. Summaries of audit findings and related pass-through entity management decisions, if any; and https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=d0a7d210741bedf0bf74f419b27725e6&mc=true&n=sp2.1.200.d&r=SUBPART&ty=HTML#se2.1.200_1332 https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=d0a7d210741bedf0bf74f419b27725e6&mc=true&n=sp2.1.200.d&r=SUBPART&ty=HTML#se2.1.200_1332
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 13
e. Actions the pass-through entity has taken to correct any deficiencies such as those specified at 2 CFR § 200.332
(d) and (f), 2 CFR § 200.208, Specific conditions, and 2 CFR § 200.339, Remedies for Noncompliance.
E. Property Profile Submission
1. The CAR must report on interim progress (e.g., assessments started, reuse planning activities started) and any final accomplishments (e.g., assessments completed, clean up required, contaminants found, institutional controls required, engineering controls required, leveraged dollars and/or jobs) by completing and submitting relevant portions of the electronic Property Profile Form using the Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES). The CAR must enter the data in ACRES as soon as the interim action or final accomplishment has occurred, or within 30 days after the end of each reporting quarter. The CAR must enter any new data into ACRES prior to submitting the quarterly performance report to the EPA Project Officer. The CAR must utilize the electronic version of the Property Profile Form in ACRES unless approval is obtained from the EPA Project Officer to use the hardcopy version of the Property Profile Form or its use is included in the approved workplan.
F. Final Cooperative Agreement Performance Report with Environmental Results
1. In accordance with the regulations at 2 CFR Parts 200 and 1500 (specifically, § 200.329, Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance and 2 CFR § 200.344(a), Closeout), the CAR agrees to submit to the EPA Project Officer within 120 days after the expiration or termination of the approved project period a final performance report on the cooperative agreement via email; unless the EPA Project Officer agrees to accept a paper copy of the report. The final performance report shall document and summarize the elements listed in Section III.D.2., as appropriate, for activities that occurred over the entire project period.
IV. FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS
A. Eligible Uses of the Funds for the Cooperative Agreement Recipient
1. To the extent allowable under the EPA-approved workplan, cooperative agreement funds may be used for eligible programmatic expenses to inventory, characterize, assess sites; conduct site-specific planning, general brownfield-related planning activities around one or more brownfield sites; conduct outreach and community engagement; and for reasonable participant support costs associated with one community liaison per target area identified in the selected FY25 application.
Refer to the EPA Guidance on Participant Support Costs for information regarding reasonable stipend amounts for community liaisons. Eligible programmatic expenses include activities described in Section V. of these Terms and Conditions. In addition, eligible programmatic expenses may include:
a. Determining whether assessment activities at a particular site are authorized by CERCLA § 104(k).
b. Ensuring that an assessment complies with applicable requirements under Federal and state laws, as required by CERCLA § 104(k).
c. Preparing and updating an Analysis of Brownfield Cleanup Alternatives (ABCA) which will include information about the site and contamination issues, cleanup standards, applicable laws, alternatives considered, and the proposed cleanup.
d. Preparing a Community Involvement Plan which includes reasonable notice, opportunity for public involvement and comment on the proposed cleanup, and response to comments.
e. Developing a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) as required by 2 CFR § 1500.12. The specific requirement for a QAPP is outlined in Implementation of Quality Assurance Requirements for Organizations Receiving EPA Financial Assistance available at https://www.epa.gov/grants/implementation-quality-assurance-requirements-organizations-receiving-epa-financial.
f. Using a portion of the cooperative agreement funds to purchase environmental insurance for the characterization or assessment of the site. [Funds shall not be used to purchase insurance intended to provide coverage for any of the ineligible uses under Section IV., Ineligible Uses of the Funds for the Cooperative Agreement Recipient.] https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=cdcecbd4815d6d4ad1f493f1074523f9&mc=true&n=sp2.1.200.d&r=SUBPART&ty=HTML#se2.1.200_1332 https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=cdcecbd4815d6d4ad1f493f1074523f9&mc=true&n=sp2.1.200.d&r=SUBPART&ty=HTML#se2.1.200_1332 https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=d0a7d210741bedf0bf74f419b27725e6&mc=true&r=SUBPART&n=sp2.1.200.c#se2.1.200_1208 https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=d0a7d210741bedf0bf74f419b27725e6&mc=true&r=SUBPART&n=sp2.1.200.c#se2.1.200_1208 https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=d0a7d210741bedf0bf74f419b27725e6&mc=true&n=sp2.1.200.d&r=SUBPART&ty=HTML#se2.1.200_1339 https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2020-11/documents/epa-guidance-on-participant-support-costs.pdf https://www.epa.gov/grants/implementation-quality-assurance-requirements-organizations-receiving-epa-financial https://www.epa.gov/grants/implementation-quality-assurance-requirements-organizations-receiving-epa-financial
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 14
g. Any other eligible programmatic costs, including direct costs incurred by the recipient in reporting to EPA;
procuring and managing contracts; awarding, monitoring, and managing subawards to the extent required to comply with 2 CFR § 200.332 and the “Establishing and Managing Subawards” General Term and Condition; and carrying out community engagement pertaining to the assessment activities.
2. Under CERCLA § 104(k)(5)(E), CARs and subrecipients may use up to 5% of the amount of Federal funding for this cooperative agreement for administrative costs, including indirect costs under 2 CFR § 200.414. The limit on administrative costs for the CAR under this agreement is $25,000 The total amount of indirect costs and any direct costs for cooperative agreement administration by the CAR paid for by EPA under the cooperative agreement shall not exceed this amount.
Subrecipients may use up to 5% of the amount of Federal funds in their subawards for administrative costs. As required by 2 CFR § 200.403(d), the CAR and subrecipients must classify administrative costs as direct or indirect consistently and shall not classify the same types of costs in both categories. The term “administrative costs” does not include:
a. Investigation and identification of the extent of contamination of a brownfield site;
b. Design and performance of a response action; or
c. Monitoring of a natural resource.
Eligible cooperative agreement and subaward administrative costs subject to the 5% limitation include direct costs for:
a. Costs incurred to comply with the following provisions of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards at 2 CFR Parts 200 and 1500 other than those identified as programmatic.
i. Record-keeping associated with equipment purchases required under 2 CFR § 200.313;
ii. Preparing revisions and changes in the budgets, scopes of work, program plans, and other activities required under 2 CFR § 200.308;
iii. Maintaining and operating financial management systems required under 2 CFR § 200.302;
iv. Preparing payment requests and handling payments under 2 CFR § 200.305;
v. Financial reporting under 2 CFR § 200.328;
vi. Non-Federal audits required under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F; and
vii. Closeout under 2 CFR § 200.344 with the exception of preparing the recipient's final performance report. Costs for preparing this report are programmatic and are not subject to the 5% limitation on direct administrative costs.
b. Pre-award costs for preparation of the proposal and application for this cooperative agreement (including the final workplan) or applications for subawards are not allowable as direct costs but may be included in the CAR's or subrecipient's indirect cost pool to the extent authorized by 2 CFR § 200.460.
3. [Local Governments Only] – If authorized in the EPA-approved workplan and budget narrative, up to 10% of the funds awarded by this agreement may be used by the CAR itself as a programmatic cost for Brownfield Program development and implementation of monitoring health conditions and institutional controls. The health monitoring activities must be associated with brownfield sites at which at least a Phase II environmental site assessment is conducted and is contaminated with hazardous substances. The CAR must maintain records on funds that will be used to carry out this task to ensure compliance with this requirement.
4. [Participant support costs associated with a community liaison] - If authorized in the EPA approved scope of work and
BF - 03J16101 - 0 Page 15 budget narrative, the CAR may use a portion of the Assessment Grant for eligible participant support costs associated with one community liaison per target area who is not an employee of the CAR or the CAR's contractor(s) or subrecipient(s).
Additional target areas cannot be added to the project for the purpose of using participant support costs to fund additional community liaisons. Eligible participant support costs may include reasonable stipends to compensate an individual community member's time and travel costs for participating in project-related meetings (e.g., meetings with the community, meetings held by a brownfields advisory board, etc.) and time associated with other specific tasks that are directly tied to related community engagement efforts. Stipends may only be paid for actual time spent working on tasks associated with the project and must not duplicate support provided through other Federal, state, tribal, or local programs.
A CAR that uses participant support costs must follow the process described in their EPA-approved workplan (or in a separate process approved by EPA post-award) for determining the amounts of allowable stipend(s), procedures for accounting for participant support cost payments (including receipts), and documenting that the costs are allowable and do not duplicate other support for the individual(s). As provided in CFR § 200.456, “The classification of items as participant support costs must be documented in the recipient's or subrecipient's written policies and procedures and treated consistently across all Federal awards.” Additional information on these requirements for the use of participant support costs is available in EPA's Guidance on Participant Support Costs.
B. Ineligible Uses of the Funds for the Cooperative Agreement Recipient
1. Cooperative agreement funds shall not be used by the CAR for any of the following activities:
a. Cleanup activities;
b. Site development activities that are not brownfield site assessment activities (e.g., marketing of property (activities or products created specifically to attract buyers or investors) or construction of a new facility);
c. General community visioning, area-wide zoning updates, design guideline development, master planning, green infrastructure, infrastructure service delivery, and city-wide or comprehensive planning/plan updates – these activities are all ineligible uses of grant funds if unrelated to advancing cleanup and reuse of brownfield sites or sites to be assessed. Note: for these types of activities to be an eligible use of grant funds, there must be a specific nexus between the activity and how it will help further cleanup and reuse of the priority brownfield site(s). This nexus must be clearly described in the workplan for the project;
d. Job training activities unrelated to performing a specific assessment at a site (i.e., on the job training) covered by the cooperative agreement;
e. To pay for a penalty or fine;
f. To pay a Federal cost share requirement (e.g., a cost share required by another Federal grant) unless there is specific statutory authority;
g. To pay for a response cost at a brownfield site for which the CAR or subaward recipient is potentially liable under
CERCLA § 107;
h. To pay a cost of compliance with any Federal law, excluding the cost of compliance with laws applicable to the assessment; and
i. Unallowable costs (e.g., lobbying and purchases of alcoholic beverages) under 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E.
2. Cooperative agreement funds shall not be used for any of the following properties:
a. Facilities listed, or proposed for listing, on the National Priorities List (NPL);
b. Facilities subject to unilateral administrative…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .