Best Value Determination Form 6100020791.pdf

PDF 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Benefit Cost Analysis Courses
Solicitation number
6100020791
Issued by
Lycoming County, Westmoreland County, Mount Aetna CDP, Pennsylvania

About this file

The document is a Best Value Determination Form for a Request for Quotation (RFQ) issued by the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA), Bureau of Recovery & Mitigation, Hazard Mitigation Division for Benefit Cost Analysis Courses. The evaluation criteria outlined in the form include Understanding the Problem, Contractor Prior Experience, Contractor Personnel & Qualifications, Training Work Plan, and Cost. The evaluation team comprised Tom Hughes, State Hazard Mitigation Officer, and Don Smith, Hazard Mitigation Project Coordinator. The form indicates that the agency has selected the best value contractor based on the criteria, and the narrative section lists the distinguishing factors of the selected contractor and their proposal.

The document does not provide additional details on pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements and sources, or other salient information. The focus is on the evaluation and selection process for the Benefit Cost Analysis Courses project.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment A SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment B Cost Matrix.pdf PDF
Attachment C DomWorkForce.pdf PDF
Attachment D Lobbying Cert.pdf PDF
Attachment D Lobbying Activities.pdf PDF
RFQ Template 6100020791.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Rev. 06/28/2011

Best Value Determination Form for Projects Between $5,001 and $250,000

RFQ FOR Benefit Cost Analysis Courses

BEST VALUE DETERMINATION FORM

Agency Name: PEMA Hazard Mitigation Division

ITQ #: 6100020791

Evaluation Officer/Team Name(s): Tom Hughes, State Hazard Mitigation Officer/Don Smith, Hazard Mitigation Project Coordinator

ORDER SELECTION CRITERIA CONTRACTORS

Company A Company B Company C Company D Company E

( 2 ) Understanding the Problem ( 1 ) Contractor Prior Experience ( 3 ) Contractor Personnel & Qualifications ( 4 ) Training Work Plan ( 5 ) Cost ($ amount)

Scoring: Excellent, Good, Average, Fair, Poor (enter “E, G, A, F, or P”)

For Cost, DB, DWU, & EZSB - enter actual amount/percentage quoted by each contractor

Rev. 06/28/2011

Narrative: Reasons for Selection:

Based on the selection criteria set forth in the RFQ, the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, Bureau of Recovery & Mitigation, Hazard Mitigation Divison has selected ______<contractor name>_________________ as providing the best value to the <agency name> for this project because this Contractor presented:

[LIST DISTINGUISHING FACTORS OF SELECTED CONTRACTOR AND/OR THEIR PROPOSAL/QUOTE, SUCH AS: “the best/most relevant experience and/or qualifications, the most reasonable cost, significant disadvantaged business participation, the best technical approach or solution, etc.] and this combination of qualifications and proposal features best meets the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency needs for this project.

Prepared and Submitted by:

Evaluation Officer or Team Leader DATE:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .